Advertisement

A Statistical Comparison of Galactic SNRs and Galactic Giant HII Regions

  • Z. W. Li
  • J. C. Wheeler
  • F. N. Bash
Conference paper
Part of the Astrophysics and Space Science Library book series (ASSL, volume 109)

Abstract

In order to examine the quality of the evidence, we test the hypothesis that all supernovae in the Galaxy lie in narrow spiral arms. The distributions in longitude of 138 SNRs and 100 giant HII regions are presented, and compared with a simple Monte Carlo model in which 140 supernovae are distributed either along arms according to a density wave model, or uniformly in the plane. The model is intended to give a statistical measure of the ratio of Type II (spiral arms) to Type I (disk) supernovae in the Galaxy. We wish to compare the distributions in galactic longitude of supernova remnants (SNRs) with those predicted by our model in order to allow a comparison which is independent of the computed distance to the SNR. The observed SNR distribution seem to correlate with that of the giant HII regions and hence with the spiral arms.

The Monte Carlo model confirms that there is no obvious population of SNRs not confined to spiral arms. This may suggest that the ratio of Type I to Type II events in the Galaxy is less than unity, or that Type I supernovae do not make long-lived extended remnants.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amnuel, P. R. et al., 1982, Astrophys. & Space Science, 82, 3.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. Bash, F. N., 1981, Ap. J., 250, 551.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. Blitz, L. et al., 1982, Ap. J. (Suppl.), 49, 183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Caswell, J. L. and Lerche, I. 1979, M.N.R.A.S., 187, 202.ADSGoogle Scholar
  5. Clark, D. H. and Caswell, J. L. 1976, M.N.R.A.S., 174, 267.ADSGoogle Scholar
  6. Downes, D. 1971, A. J., 76, 305.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. Georgelin, Y. M. and Georgelin, Y. D. (1976) A. & Ap., 49, 57.ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. Maza, J. and Van den Bergh, 1976, Ap. J., 204, 519.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. Milne, D. K., 1979, Aust. J. Phys., 32, 83.ADSGoogle Scholar
  10. Oemler, A. and Tinsley, B. M. 1979, A. J., 84, 985.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. Tammann, G. A., 1982, in Supernovae: A Survey of Current Research, ed. M. J. Rees and R. J. Stoneham, p. 371.Google Scholar
  12. Twarog, B. A. and Wheeler, J. C., Ap. J., 261, 636.Google Scholar
  13. Van den Bergh, 1982, IAU No. 101.Google Scholar
  14. Wheeler, J. C. and Wheeler, J. A., 1983, in Science Underground, ed. M. M. Nieto, AIP Conference Proceeding No. 96.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Z. W. Li
    • 1
  • J. C. Wheeler
    • 1
  • F. N. Bash
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AstronomyUniversity of TexasAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations