Advertisement

The Molecular Hypothesis: From 1811 to Cannizzaro’s ‘sunto’ in 1858

  • Mario Morselli
Chapter
Part of the Chemists and Chemistry book series (CACH, volume 1)

Abstract

In the two decades which followed the ‘Essai d’une manière’, Avogadro published three more essays dealing with the molecular hypothesis: in 1814 the ‘Mémoire sur les masses relatives’ appeared in the Journal de Physique of de La Methérie and the other two in the official organ of the Royal Academy of Sciences of Turin. One may assume that at least the two articles in the Parisian journal should have reached a rather large audience outside Piedmont. Due to the peculiar position of this region, then a Department of the French Empire, there was never a problem of communication between Paris and Turin even during the Napoleonic Wars. As for the ‘Nouvelles considerations’ and the ‘Mémoire sur la manière’, they both were published after Waterloo when Europe had been at peace for many years and circulation of news and mail no longer presented a problem.

Keywords

Atomic Weight Vapor Density Simple Atom Scientific Biography Swedish Chemist 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Avogadro, A., J. Phys. Chim. Hist. Nat. 73 (1811), 60.Google Scholar
  2. Avogadro, A., Mem. R. Acc. Sci Torino, ser. 2, 1 (1839), 179; ser. 2, 8 (1846), 129; 26 (1821), 60.Google Scholar
  3. Avogadro, A., Ann. Chim. ser. 3, 14 (1845), 330.Google Scholar
  4. Avogadro, A., Giorn. Fis. Chim. Storia Naturale, 31 (1827), 1Google Scholar
  5. Avogadro, A., Fisica dei corpi ponderabili, vol. II, Turin, Stamperia Reale, 1838.Google Scholar
  6. Ampère, A. M., Opere, M. Bertolini (ed.), Turin, UTET, 1969.Google Scholar
  7. Baudrimont, M. A., Comptes Rendus, 20 (1845), 960.Google Scholar
  8. Berthollet, C. L., Chemical Statics, London, Mawman, 1804.Google Scholar
  9. Berzelius, J., Jahresbericht, 13 (1834), 32, 63; 14(1835), 84; 16(1837), 1; 19 (1840), 370; 26 (1847), 42. Ann. Phil. 2 (1813), 450; 5 (1815), 10, 123.Google Scholar
  10. Bonner, J., ‘A. Avogadro, a reassessment of his research...’, Ph. D. dissertation, Johns Hopkins University, 1974.Google Scholar
  11. Brock, W. H., Isis, 56 (1965), 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brock, W. H., J. Chem. Education, 40 (1963), 652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brooke, J. H., Studies Hist. Phil Sci. 4 (1973), 90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Buchdahl, G., Brit. J. Phil Sci. 10 (1959), 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cannizzaro, S., Nuovo Cimento, 6 (1857), 428; 7 (1858), 376.Google Scholar
  16. Coley, N. G. G., “A. Avogadro and the molecular hypothesis”, dissertation, Leicester University, 1964.Google Scholar
  17. Crosland, M., The Society of Arcueil, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
  18. Dalton, J., Ann. Phil 9 (1817), 189.Google Scholar
  19. Davy, H., Phil Mag. 37 (1811), 411.Google Scholar
  20. Delacre, M., Histoire de la Chimie, Paris, 1920.Google Scholar
  21. Donovan, M., Elements of Chemistry, London, 1832.Google Scholar
  22. Dumas, J. B., Comptes Rendus, 7 (1838), 474; 10 (1840), 149.Google Scholar
  23. Dumas, J. B., Ann. Chim. 33 (1826), 337; 52 (1833), 400.Google Scholar
  24. Fox, R., Brit. J. Hist. Sci. 4 (1968), 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Frankland, E., Phil Tran. 142 (1852), 417; 145 (1855), 259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Freund, I., The Study of Chemical Composition, repr. New York, Dover, 1968.Google Scholar
  27. Gaudin, A. M., Ann. Chim. 52 (1833), 113.Google Scholar
  28. Gerhardt, C., Comptes Rendus, 15 (1842), 498.Google Scholar
  29. Giua, M., Storia della Chimica, Turin, UTET, 1946.Google Scholar
  30. Gladstone, S., J. Chem. Educ. 24 (1947).Google Scholar
  31. Graebe, C., J. Prakt. Chemie, 87 (1913), 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Greenaway, F., John Dalton and the Atom, Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
  33. Grimaux, L. E., Théories et notations chimiques, Paris, 1884.Google Scholar
  34. Herivel, J. W., Brit. J. Hist. Sci. 3 (1966), 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hoefer, F., Histoire de la Physique et Chimie, Paris, 1863.Google Scholar
  36. Ihde, A., Great chemists, E. Farber (ed.), New York, Interscience, 1961.Google Scholar
  37. Knopp, J., Ann. Chem. Pharm. 105 (1858), 390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Laurent, A., Ann. Chim. 18 (1846), 266; 66 (1836), 175.Google Scholar
  39. Laurent, A., Comptes Rendus, 19 (1844), 1089.Google Scholar
  40. Liebig, J., Ann. Pharm. 31 (1839), 119.Google Scholar
  41. Mauskopf, S., Isis, 60 (1969), 60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Meyer, von E., Storia della Chimica, Milan, Hoepli, 1922.Google Scholar
  43. Mitscherlich, E„ Pogg. Ann. 29 (1833), 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mollet, J., J. Phys. 90 (1820), 113.Google Scholar
  45. Partington, J. T., A History of Chemistry, vol. IV, London, Macmillan, 1964.Google Scholar
  46. Pebal, L. Ann. Chemie, 123 (1862), 199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Prout, W., Ann. Phil 6 (1815), 323.Google Scholar
  48. Prout, W., Chemistry, Meteorology, and Function of Digestion, Bridgewater Treatise VIII, Philadelphia, 1834.Google Scholar
  49. Siegfried, R., Acts of the 10th International Congress of History of Science, 1962.Google Scholar
  50. Taton, R., History of Science, vol. Ill, New York, 1964.Google Scholar
  51. Than, A. K., Ann. Chemie, 131 (1864), 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wurtz, A., Histoire des doctrines chimiques, Paris, Hachette, 1868.Google Scholar
  53. Wurtz, A., Leçons de philosophie chimique, Paris, 1863.Google Scholar
  54. Wurtz, A., Comptes Rendus, 84 (1877), 977.Google Scholar
  55. Williamson, A., Phil. Mag. 37 (1851), 350.Google Scholar
  56. Williamson, A., J. Chem. Soc. 4 (1852), 229.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mario Morselli

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations