Advertisement

The Question of the Rationality of Social Interaction

  • Apel Karl-Otto
Chapter
  • 98 Downloads
Part of the Phaenomenologica book series (PHAE, volume 95)

Abstract

The topic of my paper could have its place in the context of analytical theory of action. But within the framework of a post-behavioristic approach, this type of action-theory seems to converge broadly with that of a phenomenology of action. Viewed this way, the question under discussion could hold a twofold cognitive interest. Relating the concept of action to the concept of rationality may, on the one hand, serve to explicate the concept of action (for example, in the sense of a typology of actions according to the criteria of their specific rationality or degree of rationalization). On the other hand, using the concept of rationality or rationalization in order to characterize types of action provides a method of explicating the concept of rationality or reason (for example, in the sense of a distinction between different concepts or types of rationality).1

Keywords

Moral Norm Human Speech Argumentative Discourse Consensual Communication Strategical Rationality 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 5.
    Weber, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, trans. Talcott Parsons ( London and New York: Scribner, 1930 ).Google Scholar
  2. 6.
    Cf. Habermas, “Aspects of the Rationality of Action,” p. 194.Google Scholar
  3. 8.
    Weber, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, 3d ed. (Cologne, 1964), p. 19.Google Scholar
  4. 10.
    See John Von Neumann and Oskar Morgenstern, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior ( Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1944 ).Google Scholar
  5. 11.
    Cf. O. Höffe’s critical overview in Strategien der Humanität: Zur Ethik öffentlicher Entscheidungsprozesse (Freiburg and Munich, 1975), pt. 1.Google Scholar
  6. 12.
    Immanuel Kant, Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten, vol. 4 (Akade- mie-Textausgabe), pp. 428–29.Google Scholar
  7. 13.
    Cf. Apel, Towards a Transformation of Philosophy (London: Routledge and Kegal Paul, 1980), pp. 233 ff.; also, Apel, “The Conflicts of Our Time and the Problem of Political Ethics,” in From Contract to Community ( New York and Basel: Marcel Dekker, 1978 ), pp. 81–102.Google Scholar
  8. 15.
    Kant, Kritik der praktischen Vernunft, vol. 5 (Akademie-Textausgabe), pp. 46-7. Cf. K.-H. Ilting, “Der naturalistische Fehlschluss bei Kant,” in Rehabili- tierung der praktischen Vernunft, ed. M. Riedel ( Freiburg: Rombach, 1972 ), pp. 113–32.Google Scholar
  9. 17.
    Cf. John Langshaw Austin, How to Do Things with Words (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1962 ) and John R. Searle, Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language ( London: Cambridge University Press, 1969 ).Google Scholar
  10. 24.
    Cf. Apel, “Transcendental Semiotics and the Paradigms of First Philosophy,” Philosophic Exchange 2, no. 4 (1978), pp. 3–22.Google Scholar
  11. 25.
    Cf. Habermas, “Towards a Theory of Communicative Competence,” Inquiry 13 (1970), pp. 205–18; also, Habermas, Communication and the Evolution of Society (Boston: Beacon Press, forthcoming).Google Scholar
  12. 27.
    Cf. Dietrich Bohler, “Entwicklungsprobleme und Entwicklungsschwellen der praktischen Vernunft,” in Reader zu Funkkolleg: Praktische Philosophie/Ethik 1, ed. Karl-Otto Apel et al. ( Frankfurt: Fischer, 1980 ).Google Scholar
  13. 29.
    Cf. Apel, “Types of Social Science in the Light of Human Interests of Knowledge,” Social Research 44, no. 3 (1977), pp. 425–70 reprinted in Philosophical Disputes in the Social Sciences, ed. S. Brown (Brighton: Harvester Press, 1979). Cf. also, Apel, “The ’Erklären/Verstehen—Controversy in the Philosphy of the Human and Natural Sciences,” in Contemporary Philosophy. A New Survey, vol. 2,Google Scholar
  14. 31.
    Cf. Apel, “C.S. Peirce and the Post-Tarskian Problem of an Adequate Explication of the Meaning of Truth,” Part 1, in The Monist 63, no. 3 (1980), pp. 386–407; Part 2 in Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 18, no. 1 (1982), pp. 3–17 ff.Google Scholar
  15. 32.
    See Karl Raimund Popper, The Open Society and Its Enemies, vol. 2 (London: G. Routledge & Sons, 1945), pp. 231 ff.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Apel Karl-Otto
    • 1
  1. 1.FrankfurtGermany

Personalised recommendations