Skip to main content

Usefulness of Peripheral Testing in Automated Screening Perimetry

  • Chapter
Sixth International Visual Field Symposium

Part of the book series: Documenta Ophthalmologica Proceedings Series ((DOPS,volume 42))

Abstract

Peripheral field exploration consumed 40% of testing time during a study involving the Fieldmaster 200 and Dicon AP2000 perimeters used in a screening mode. In 3% of eyes found abnormal by reference quantitative Goldmann perimetry, the peripheral field detected an abnormality which the central field had missed. In 10% of cases, a diagnostic characterization was made possible or improved in quality by the peripheral visual field. In an additional 52% of cases, the peripheral field confirmed an abnormality detected on central field testing, and enhanced confidence of the validity of the central field data. Strategies for screening fields should thus de-emphasize, but not ignore, the peripheral visual field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Heijl, A. and Drance, S.M. A clinical comparison of three computerized automatic perimeters in the detection of glaucoma defects. Arch. Ophthalmol. 99: 832– 6 (1981).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Johnson, C.A. and Keltner, J.L. Automated suprathreshold static perimetry. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 89: 731– 741 (1980).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Keltner, J.L., Johnson, C.A., and Balestrery, F.G. Suprathreshold static perimetry-initial clinical trials with the Fieldmaster automated perimeter. Arch. Ophthalmol. 97:260– 72 (1979).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. . Mills, R.P. A comparison of Goldmann, Fieldmaster 200, and Dicon AP2000 perimeters used in a screeting mode. Opthalmology 91 (in press)(1984).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rock, W.J., Drance, S.M., and Morgan, R.W. A modification of the Armaly visual field screening technique for glaucoma. Can. J. Ophthalmol. 6: 283– 92 (1971).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Trobe, J.D., Acosta, P.C., Shuster, J.J., and Krischer, J.P. An evaluation of the accuracy of community-based perimetry. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 90: 654– 60 (1980).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

A. Heijl E. L. Greve

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Dr. W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mills, R.P. (1985). Usefulness of Peripheral Testing in Automated Screening Perimetry. In: Heijl, A., Greve, E.L. (eds) Sixth International Visual Field Symposium. Documenta Ophthalmologica Proceedings Series, vol 42. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5512-7_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5512-7_30

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8932-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-5512-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics