Abstract
Traditionally there are two largely independent sets of concepts for the description of assemblages of plants: those pertaining to ‘populations’ and those pertaining to ‘vegetation’. To bridge the gap between them, we cannot confine ourselves to the original sets of concepts because each represents a different and incompatible global description, obtained by different ways of averaging. Nevertheless they describe the same ‘object’. Relating population and vegetation concepts can be done via a microscopic description sufficient to generate this object, which in turn can be described (amongst others) in terms of populations and/or vegetation by appropriate methods of averaging. The relations between descriptions in terms of populations and in terms of vegetation are shown to depend on variation in the microscopic structure of plant assemblages, which should be defined in terms of local interactions between local entities such as individual plants or small areas. The concepts ‘scale’ and ‘detail’ are important in our discussion.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Beeftink, W.G., Daane, M.C. and de Munck, W. (1971) Tien jaar botanisch-oecologische verkenningen langs haet Veerse Meer. Natuur en Landschap 25: 50 – 65.
Beeftink, W.G., Daane, M.C., de Munck, W. and Nieuwenhuize, J. (1978) Aspects of population dynamics in Halimione portulacoidescommunities Vegetatio 36: 31 – 43.
Bell, A.D., Roberts, D. and Smith, A. (1979) Branching patterns: the simulation of plant architecture. J. Theor. Biol. 81: 351 – 375.
Burks, A.W. (1970) Assays on Cellular Automata. University of Illinois Press.
Doing-Kraft H. (1954) L’analyse des carrés permanents. Acta Bot. Neerl. 3: 421 – 424
Dubes, R. and Jain, A.K. (1979) Validity studies in cluster methodologies. Pattern Recognition 11: 235–254:
Greig-Smith, P. (1964) Quantitative Plant Ecology, 2nd ed. Butterworths, London.
Greig-Smith, P. (1979) Pattern in vegetation, J. Ecol. 67: 755 – 779.
Goodall, D.W. (1974) A new method for the analysis of spatial pattern by random pairing of quadrats, Vegetatio 29: 135 – 146.
Goodall, D.W. and West, N.E. (1979) A comparison of techniques for assessing dispersion patterns, Vegetatio 40: 15 – 27.
Harary, F., Norman, R.Z. and Cartwright, D. (1965) Structural Models, an Introduction to the Theory of Directed Graphs. Wiley, New York.
Hogeweg, P. (1976a) Topics in biological pattern analysis. Thesis, University of Utrecht.
Hogeweg, P. (1976b) Iterative character weighing in numerical taxonomy. Comput. Biol. Med. 6: 199 – 211.
Hogeweg, P. (1983) Heterarchical systems as simulation modelling formalism, Pergamon Encyclopedia of Systems and Control. (In press).
Hogeweg, P. and Hesper, B. (1972) BIOPAT, program system for bioinformatic pattern analysis. Bioinformatica, Utrecht.
Hogeweg, P. and Hesper, B. (1979) Heterarchical, self-structuring simulation systems: Concepts and applications in biology. In Zeigler, B.P. et al. (Eds.), Methodologies in Systems Modelling and Simulation, pp 221 – 231. North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam.
Hogeweg, P. and Hesper, B. (1981a) Two predators and one prey in a patchy environment: An application of MICMAC modelling. J. Theor. Biol. 93: 411 – 432.
Hogeweg, P. and Hesper, B. (1981b) Oligothetic characterisation of clusters. Pattern Recog-Recognition 14: 131 – 136.
Hogeweg, P. and Richter, B. (1982) INSTAR, a discrete event model for simulating zooplankton population dynamics. Hydrobiologia 95: 275 – 285.
Horn, H.S. (1975) Markovian properties of forest succession, In M.L. Cody and J.M. Diamond (Eds.), Horn, H.S, pp. 196 – 213. Princeton University Press.
Kendall, M.G. (1972) Cluster, analysis. In Watanabe, S. (Ed.), Frontiers in Pattern Recognition, pp. 291 – 310. Academic Press, New York.
McMahon, J.A., Schimpf, D.J., Smith, K.G. and Bayn, R.L. (1981) An organism centered approach to some community and ecosystem concepts. J. Theoret. Biol. 88: 287 – 308.
van Noordwijk-Puijk, K., Beeftink, W.G. and Hogeweg, P. (1979) Vegetation development of salt-marsh flats after disappearance of the tidal factor. Vegetatio 39: 1 – 13.
Rosenfeld, A. (1969) Picture Processing by Computer. Academic Press.
Ward, H.H. (1963) Hierarchical grouping to optimise an objective function. J. Amer. Stat. Ass. 58: 236 – 244.
Williams, W.T., Lance, G.N., Dale, M.B. and Clifford, H.T. (1971) Controversy concerning the criteria for taxonomic strategies. The Computer J. 14: 162 – 165.
Zeigler, B.P. (1976) Theory of Modelling and Simulation. Wiley, New York.
Zeigler, B.P. (1982) Discrete event models for cell space simulation. Int. J. Theor. Physics 21: 21: 573 – 588.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1985 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hogeweg, P., Hesper, B., Van Schaik, C.P., Beeftink, W.G. (1985). Patterns in Vegetation Succession, an Ecomorphological Study. In: White, J. (eds) The Population Structure of Vegetation. Handbook of Vegetation Science, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5500-4_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5500-4_27
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8927-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-5500-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive