Abstract
Hilary Putnam has stressed, in his recent writings, the distinction between metaphysical and internal realism (see e.g. Putnam, 1978, 1981, 1982a, and 1982b). In what follows I shall examine issues related to this distinction, or to something related to this distinction. We should note, to begin with, that the distinction is in fact a Kantian one. Kant came in his philosophy to oppose “transcendental realism” and to endorse “empirical realism” (and the “transcendental idealism” associated with it). Putnam’s metaphysical realism corresponds here, roughly, to transcendental realism, and his internal realism to Kant’s empirical realism (cf. Chapter 1).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1985 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tuomela, R. (1985). Internal Realism. In: Science, Action, and Reality. Episteme, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5446-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5446-5_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8905-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-5446-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive