Abstract
Until now we have, with few exceptions, only studied such passages of the PŚ as occur in the discussion of Par. L. And, it may be added, in all cases we have been able to interpret them in accordance with what we had found to be Nāgeśa’s interpretation of the BP in the first part of this book. It is high time that we turned to Par. LI. The discussion of that Paribhās0323ā contains probably the most formidable challenge to the main thesis of this book. It contains this challenge in its very first sentence, i.e., in the sentence that introduces the Paribhāṣā.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Fn. 1 (p. 164): ‘aca ānantaryam’ iti gha. ṅa. pāṭhaḥ /.
Fn. 2 (p. 164): ‘niṣedhāprāpteḥ’ iti mudriteṣu pa ṭhaḥ /.
Fn.3: ‘sū trasthatuggrahaṇam’ iti gha. pāṭhaḥ /.
Fn. 4 (p. 102): C.G.H -ntaryanimittake; B. -ntaryanimitte.
Fn. 1 (p. 103): P. mentions the reading tasya bhāvo bahiṣṭvaṃ bahiraṅgatvam.
Fn. 4: C.G.H. ity āṅgrahaṇaṃ; B. ity atrāṅgrahanaṃ.
Fn. 1 (p. 102): C.G. parādivattvenau-; B.H. parāditvenau-.
Fn. 2 (p. 102): P. reads padatvena sasya padādi-.
Fn. 3 (p. 102): C.G.H, niṣedhaḥ; B. ṣatvaniṣedhaḥ.
Below, p. 186.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1986 D. Reidel Publishing Company
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bronkhorst, J. (1986). Par. LI. In: Tradition and Argument in Classical Indian Linguistics. Studies of Classical India, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5394-9_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5394-9_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8881-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-5394-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive