Skip to main content

Evolutionary Biology, Human Nature, and Knowledge

  • Chapter
Book cover Sociobiology and Epistemology

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 180))

Abstract

Since major Western philosophers considered human knowledge and social values in terms of the natural science of their time, it is appropriate to assess the epistemological implications of the contemporary evolutionary theory colloquially known as “sociobiology.” Recent models of natural selection indicate the need to consider human social life in terms of five distinct areas of analysis: individual development (epigenesis), within-group variation, between-group variation, the hierarchical organization of complex systems, and feedback between systemic levels. In each of these domains, modern “social biology” has striking implications for traditional philosophic questions. While some positions, like those of the Sophists or of the English Empiricists, are seriously challenged by the findings of modern evolutionary biology, Aristotelian ethics and the dialectical tradition from Plato to Hegel appear to be reinforced to a surprising degree by contemporary biological theories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alexander, Richard D.: 1979, Darwinism and Human Affairs, University of Washington Press, Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antiphon: 1923, Discours, Suivis des Fragments d’Antiphon le Sophiste (ed. Louis Gernet), Editions des Belles Lettres, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P. W.: 1972, ‘More is Different’, Science 177, 393–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, Robert: 1984, The Evolution of Cooperation, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, Robert and Hamilton, William D.: 1981, ‘The Evolution of Cooperation’, Science 211, 1390–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barash, David: 1977, Sociobiology and Behavior, Elsevier, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, Arthur (ed.): 1978, The Sociobiology Debate, Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra, Fritjof: 1975, The Tao of Physics, Shambala, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli-Sforza, Luigi L., and Feldman, M. W.: 1981, Cultural Transmission: A Quantitative Approach, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, Ivan: 1980, ‘Cooperative and Noncooperative Behavior in Animals’, American Naturalist 115, 827–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Theodosius: 1966, Evolution, Genetics, and Man, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durham, William: 1979, ‘Toward a Coevolutionary Theory of Human Biology and Culture’, in Napoleon Chagnon and William Irons (eds.), Evolutionary Biology and Human Social Behavior, Duxbury Press, North Scituate, Mass., pp. 39–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, Stephen J.: 1977, Ontogeny and Phylogeny, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, Stephen J.: 1981, The Mismeasure of Man, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruter, Margaret and Bohannan, Paul (eds.): 1983, Law, Biology, and Culture, Ross Erikson, Santa Barbara.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, William: 1964, ‘The Genetical Evolution of Social Behavior’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 7, 1–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg, Werner: 1952, Philosophic Problems of Nuclear Science, Faucett, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg, Werner: 1958, Physics and Philosophy, Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschleifer, Jack: 1980, ‘Evolutionary Models in Economics and Law: Cooperation versus Conflict Strategies’, UCLA Department of Economics Working Paper 170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjort, Johann: 1938, The Human Value of Biology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, Zing-Yang: 1967, Dynamics of Behavior Development, Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, Konrad: 1965, Evolution and Modification of Behavior, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, Konrad: 1970–71, Studies in Animal and Human Behaviour, 2 vols., Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumsden, Charles and Wilson, Edward O.: 1981, Genes, Mind, and Culture, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, Howard: 1981, Selfishness, Altruism, and Rationality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, Roger D.: 1970, ‘Genes, Language, and Evolution’, Semiotica 2, 295–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masters, Roger D.: 1975, ‘Politics as a Biological Phenomenon’, Social Science Information 14, 7–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masters, Roger D.: 1978, ‘Classical Political Philosophy and Contemporary Biology’, Paper presented to Conference for the Study of Political Thought, Chicago, Ill. (Politikos, in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, Roger D.: 1979, ‘Jean-Jacques is Alive and Well: Rousseau and Contemporary Sociobiology’, Daedalus (Summer), 93–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, Roger D.: 1980, ‘Hobbes and Locke’, in R. Fitzgerald (ed.), Comparing Political Thinkers, Pergamon, New York, pp. 116–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, Roger D.: 1981, ‘The Value — and Limits — of Sociobiology’, in Elliot White (ed.), Sociobiology and Human Politics, Lexington Books, Lexington, Mass., pp. 135–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, Roger D.: 1982, ‘Is Sociobiology Reactionary? The Political Implications of Inclusive Fitness Theory’, Quarterly Review of Biology 57, 215–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, Roger D.: 1983a, ‘The Biological Nature of the State’, World Politics 25, 161–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masters, Roger D.: 1983b, ‘Social Biology and the Welfare State’, in Richard F. Tomasson (ed.), Comparative Social Research, 1983, JAI Press, Greenwich, Conn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, Roger D.: 1984a, ‘Explaining “Male Chauvinism” and “Feminism”: Cultural Differences in Male and Female Reproductive Strategies’, in Meredith Watts (ed.), Biopolitics and Gender, Haworth Press, New York, pp. 165–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, Roger D.: 1984b, ‘Evolution and History in Political Thought from Aristotle to Marx’, Paper presented to Symposium on ‘Punctuated Equibria vs. Gradualism: Political Implications’, Annual Meeting of American Association for the Advancement of Science, New York, May 25, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard-Smith, John: 1978, ‘The Evoluton of Behavior’, Scientific American 239, 176–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, Ernst: 1963, Animal Species and Evolution, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattee, H. H. (ed.): 1913, Hierarchy Theory, Braziller, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, Alexander: 1980, Sociobiology and the Preemption of Social Science, Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, Michael: 1979, Sociobiology: Sense or Nonsense? D. Reidel, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, George G.: 1958, ‘The Study of Evolution: Methods and Present Status of Theory’, in A. Roe and G. G. Simpson (eds.), Behavior and Evolution, Yale University Press, New Haven, pp. 7–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stent, Gunther: 1972, ‘Cellular Communication’, Scientific American 227, 49–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, Leo: 1953, Natural Right and History, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiersky, Ronald: 1980, ‘Confusion and Uncertainty in Comparative Polities’, Johns Hopkins University Bologna Center, Occasional paper 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, Robert: 1974, ‘Parent-Offspring Conflict’, American Zoologist 14, 249–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Cranach, Mario (ed.): 1976, Methods of Inference from Animal to Human Behavior, Mouton., The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Cranach, Mario et al. (ed.): 1979, Human Ethology: Claims and Limits of a Discipline, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheelwright, Philip (ed.): 1966, The Presocratics, Odyssey, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiting, J. W. M.: 1969, ‘Effects of Climate on Certain Cultural Practices’, in A. P. Vayda (ed.), Environment and Cultural Behavior, Natural History Press, Garden City, N.Y., pp. 416–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O.: 1975, Sociobiology: The New Synthesis, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Masters, R.D. (1985). Evolutionary Biology, Human Nature, and Knowledge. In: Fetzer, J.H. (eds) Sociobiology and Epistemology. Synthese Library, vol 180. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5370-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5370-3_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-277-2006-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-5370-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics