Abstract
Marjorie Grene is among the most vigorous contemporary exponents of what she has called “the philosophical reform central to the thought of Bergson, Whitehead, Collingwood, Heidegger, and Merleau-Ponty. That is the reform which would make time the central category of metaphysics.”1
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Bennett, J.: (1871), Locke, Berkeley, Hume, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Fodor, J.: (1978), The Language of Thought, Thomas Y. Crowell Co., New York.
Green, T.: (1885–1888), Works, ed. A. L. Nettleship, 3 vols., Longmans, London.
Grene, M.: (1974), The Knower and the Known, 2nd ed., University of California Press, Berkeley.
Grene, M.: (1976), Philosophy In and Out of Europe, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Reid, T.: (1985), Philosophical Works, ed. Sir William Hamilton, 2 vols., James Thin, Edinburgh.
Rorty, R.: (1982), ‘Contemporary Philosophy of Mind’, Synthese 53, pp. 323–348.
Sellars, W.: (1963), Science, Perception and Reality, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1986 D. Reidel Publishing Company
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rorty, R. (1986). Should Hume Be Answered or Bypassed?. In: Donagan, A., Perovich, A.N., Wedin, M.V. (eds) Human Nature and Natural Knowledge. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 89. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5349-9_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5349-9_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8859-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-5349-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive