Abstract
Goal-based ethical theories, duty-based ethical theories and rights-based ethical theories have all been well represented and well canvassed during the modern era. But it has also become evident, particulary since the extensive examination of Rawls’, Dworkin’s and Nozick’s views, that none of these accounts are without very fundamental difficulties — difficulties which are not just difficulties in detail but difficulties in the basic structure and the programmatic intent of such theories. Just as with the deadlock in ethical theory of some twenty years ago there were scattered voices telling us to go back to Kant, so in our present circumstances it is understandable that some should try to return to a virtue-based ethics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Foot, P.: 1978, Virtues and Vices, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Geach, P.: 1977, The Virtues, Cambridge University Press, London.
Maclntyre, A.: 1981, After Virtue, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame.
Nielsen, K.: 1981, ‘Linguistic Philosophy and “The Meaning of Life’”, in E. D.Klemke (ed.), The Meaning of Life, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 177–204.
Wallace, J.: 1978, Virtues and Vices, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1985 D. Reidel Publishing Company
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nielsen, K. (1985). Critique of Pure Virtue: Animadversions on a Virtue-Based Ethic. In: Shelp, E.E. (eds) Virtue and Medicine. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 17. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5229-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5229-4_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8812-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-5229-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive