Abstract
Classical temples in ancient Greece show two deterministic illusionistic principles of architecture, which govern their functional design: geometric proportional i am and a set of illusion-strengthening rules in the proportionalism’s “stochastic margin”. Animal morphology, in its mechanistic deductive revival, applies just one architectural principle, which is not always satisfactory. Whether a “Greek Classical” situation occurs in the architecture of living structure is to be investigated by extreme testing with deductive methods.
Three deductive methods for explanation of living structure in animal morphology are proposed: the parts, the compromise, and the transformation deduction. The methods are based upon the systems concept for an organism, the flow chart for a functionalistic picture, and the network chart for a structuralistic picture, whereas the “optimal design” serves as the architectural principle for living structure. These methods show clearly the high explanatory power of deductive methods in morphology, but they also make one open end most explicit: neutral issues do exist.
Full explanation of living structure asks for three entries: functional design within architectural and transformational constraints. The transformational constraint brings necessarily in a stochastic component: an at random variation being a sort of “free management space”. This variation must be a variation from the deterministic principle of the optimal design, since any transformation requires space for plasticity in structure and action, and flexibility in role fulfilling. Nevertheless, finally the question comes up whether for animal structure a similar situation exists as in Greek Classical temples. This means that the at random variation, that is found when the optimal design is used to explain structure, comprises apart from a stochastic part also real deviations being yet another deterministic part. This deterministic part could be a set of rules that governs actualization in the “free management space”.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alexander, R.McN. (1982). Optima for animals.—London: Edward Arnold, 112 p.
Barel, C.D.N. (1984). Towards a constructional morphology of cichlid fishes (Teleostei, Perciformes).— Neth J Zool 33: 357–424.
Berkhoudt, H. (1980). The morphology and distribution of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in bill and tongue of the mallard (Anas platyrhynchos L).— Neth J Zool 30: 1–34.
Bertalanffy, L. von (1962). General system theory — A critical review.— General Systems 7: 1–20.
Dobzhansky, T., Ayala, F.J., Stebbins, G.L., and Valentine, J.W. (1977). Evolution.— San Francisco: Freeman, xiii+572p.
Dullemeijer, P. (1958). The mutual structural influence of the elements in a pattern.— Arch Neerl Zool 13 suppl 1: 74–88.
Dullemeijer, P. (1959). A comparative functional—anatomical study of the heads of some Viperidae.— Morph Jahrb 99: 881–985.
Dullemeijer, P. (1974). Concepts and approaches in animal aorphology.— Assen: Van Gorcum, ix+264p.
Dullemeijer, p., and BareI, C.D.N. (1976). Functional morphology and evolution. In M. Hecht, P.C. Goody and B.M. Hecht, eds., Major patterns in vertebrate evolution. Nato Advanced Study Institute Series A vol 14: 83–117.
Gegenbauer, C. (1898–1901). Vergleichende Anatomic der Wirbeltiere. Bd.I,II.— Leipzig: Engelmann, 977p. 694 p.
Gutmann, W.F., and Bonik, K. (1981). Kritische Evolutionstheorie.— Wildeshein: Gerstenberg, 227p.
James, F.C. (1982). The ecological morphology of birds: a review.— Ann Zool Fennici19: 265–276.
Janson, H.W. (1967). History of Art.— New York: Abrams, 6I0p.
Jeuken, M. (1958). Function in biology.— Acta Biotheoretica 13: 30–46.
Kingsolver, J.G., and Daniel, T.L. (1983). Mechanical determinants of nectar feeding strategy in hummingbirds.—Oecologia 60: 214–226.
Leisler, B., and Thaler, F. (1982). Differences in morphology and foraging behaviour in the goldcrest and the firecrest.— Ann Zool Fennici 19: 277–284.
Lubosch, W. (1931). Geschichte der vergleichende Anatomie.— In L. Bolk, E. Göppert, E. Kallius and W. Lubosch, eds., Handbuch der vergl Anat d Wirbeltiere Bd I, 3–76. Berlin: Urban und Schwarzenberg.
Maynard Smith, J. (1978). Optimization theory in evolution.— Ann Rev Ecol Syst 9: 31–56.
Pehrson, 0. (1979). Feeding behaviour, feeding habitat utilization, and feeding efficiency of mallard ducklings (Anas platyrhynchos L.) as guided by a domestic duck. — Viltrevy 10: 193–218.
Popper, K.R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery.— London: Hutchinson, 480 p.
Rapoport, A. (1963). Cited by: K. Bertels and D. Nauta (1974) In: Het modelbegrip in de wetenschap.— Amsterdam: Wetenschappelijke Uitgeverij, I83 p.
Rashevsky, J. (I960). Mathematical biophysics. I.— New York: 488p.
Reif, W.E. (1982). Functional morphology on the procrustean bed of the neutralism—selectionism debate.— Notes on the constructional morphology approach.— N Jb Geol Paläont Abh 164: 46–59.
Remane, A. (1952). Die Grundlagen des natürlichen Systems, der vergleichende Anatomie und der Phylogenetik. Bd. I.— Leipzig: Akad Verlagsges Geest und Portig.
Richards, O.W. (1955). D’Arcy Thompson’s mathematical transformation and the analysis of growth.— Ann New York Acad Sc 63: 456 — 473.
Richter, G. (1977). A handbook of Greek art.— 7th ed. (1st ed. 1959 ) New York: Phaidon, 431 p.
Russell, E.S. (1916). Form and function. A contribution to the history of animal morphology. — London: Murray, 383 p.
Seilacher, A. (1970). Arbeitskonzept zur Konstruktionsmorphologie.— Lethaia3: 393 — 396.
Seilacher, A. (1973). Fabricational noise in adaptive morphology.— Syst Zool 22: 451 — 465.
Talbot, S.A., and Gessner, U. (1973). Systeas physiology.— New York: Wiley, xi+511p.
Waddington, C.H. (1962). Principles of development and differentiation.— New York: MacMillan, x+115p.
Wake, D.B. (1982). Functional and evolutionary morphologists.— Persp Biol Med 25: 603 — 621.
Whyte, L.L. (1965). Internal factors in evolution.— Worcester: Trinity Press, xxiii+8lp.
Wiens, J.A., and Rotenberry, J. (1981). Patterns of morphology and ecology in grassland and shrubsteppe bird populations.— Ecol Monogr 50: 287 — 308.
Wilde, A.G.de (1963). Regelmaat cn verscheidenheid.— Groningen, Wolters, I5 p.
Young, J.Z. (1956). The life of vertebrates.— Oxford: Clarendon Press, 820p.
Zweers, C.A. (1979). Explanation of structure by optimization and systemization.— Neth J Zool 29: 418–440.
Zweers, G.A. (1982). Drinking of the pigeon (Columba livia L.).— Behaviour 80: 274–317.
Zweers, G.A. (1982). Pecking of the pigeon (Columba livia L.).— Behaviour 81: 173–230.
Zweers, G.A. (1982). The feeding system of the pigeon (Columba livia L.). — Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol 73: vii+H08p. Berlin: Springer.
Zweers, G.A. (1982). The feeding system of the pigeon (Columba livia L.). — Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol 73: vii+H08p. Berlin: Springer.
Zweers, G.A., Gerritsen, A.F.C., and van Kranenburg-Voogd, P.J. (1977). Mechanics of feeding of the mallard (Anas platyrhynchos L., Aves, Anseriformes) Contr Vert Evol 3: vii+l09p. Basel: Karger.
Zweers, G.A., van Pelt, H.C., and Beckers, A. (1981). Horphology and mechanics of the larynx of the pigeon (Columba livia L.).— Zoomorphol 99: 37–69.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1985 Martinus Nijhoff/Dr W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zweers, G.A. (1985). Greek Classicism in Living Structure? Some Deductive Pathways in Animal Morphology. In: Zweers, G.A., Dullemeijer, P. (eds) Architecture in Living Structure. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5169-3_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5169-3_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8787-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-5169-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive