Abstract
Contemporary policies in the Western industrialised world show a tendency to cut back on certain formal social services. This tendency is attributed in the introductory paper by Lentjes and Jonker to two considerations: 1) a distaste for what are seen as large impersonal institutions and a desire to promote smaller “mediating” structures; in other words to promote (or restore) a “caring community”, and 2) a desire to diminish the financial burden of the collective sector in society. There is, however, another aspect of contemporary policies which deserves our attention in this context. There is not only a tendency to cut back certain formal services; there is also a tendency to increase other formal services: the police, courts, prison (Rutherford, 1984). My paper will address the question how this switch of resources from certain social services to other services (criminal justice) has to be assessed in the light of the central theme, “how to bring about a policy that creates the conditions for a caring society”. Some conditions promote such a society; others form an obstacle to it. The thesis of this paper is that criminal justice activities are an obstacle to a caring society. Thus the switch of resources towards criminal justice is incompatible with a policy intended to promote the conditions for such a type of society. On the contrary, “reducing criminal justice” should be one of the important strategies in such a policy. I will address three aspects of criminal justice which run counter the ideal of a caring society.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Christie, N., “Conflicts as property”, British Journal of Criminology, 17: No.1.
Christie, N. (1981), “Limits to pain”, Universitets Forlaget Oslo.
Council of Europe, 1980 (1), Public opinion with respect to criminality and criminal justice. 13th conference on criminological research, Strassbourg, 1980.
Council of Europe, 1980 (2), Report on decriminalisation, Strassbourg, pp. 18-20.
Goodstein, L. and Shotland, R.L. (1980), The crime causes crime model: critical review of the relationships between fear of crime, bystander surveyance and changes in the crime rate. Victimology, No.2/4: 133–151.
Hulsman, L., Penal reform in the Netherlands. Howard Journal, 20: 150-159 and 21: 35-47.
Hulsman, L. and Bernat de Celis, J. (1982), Peines perdues, Paris.
Hulsman, L. (1984), Drug policy as a source of drug problems and a vehicle of colonisation and repression. 3rd quento courso internacional y criminologia, Quito.
Rutherford, A. (1984), Prisons and the process of justice, London: Heinemann.
Wilkins, L. (1984), Rationality and morality in the criminal justice process. In: Effective rational and humane criminal justice, HEUNI publication series. No.3, Helsinki, pp. 96-106.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1985 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hulsman, L.H.C. (1985). Conflicts as Property: Fear of Crime, Criminal Justice and the Caring Community. In: Yoder, J.A. (eds) Support Networks in a Caring Community. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5141-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5141-9_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8774-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-5141-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive