Skip to main content

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Huygens, Van Rekeningh in Spelen van Geluck (Amsterdam, 1660), refers to these problems as ‘voorstellen’, not ‘vraeg-stucken’, but apart from this they are stated in precisely the same words. The first and third originated from Femat, the fifth from Pascal and the second and fourth from Huygens (Œuvres XIV, pp. 88–91). Spinoza had a copy of the Latin edition of Huygens’ treatise (1657) in his library (no. 53). Huygens’controversy with Jan Hudde in 1665 (Œuvres V, nos. 1374–1450) made it apparent that both Huygens’ problems were ambiguous. In the case of no. 2, for example, Huygens assumed that each time a black chip is drawn it is put back, whereas Hudde assumed that it is not. Jakob Bernoulli (1654–1705), Ars conjectandt (Basel, 1713, pp. 57–65) pointed out that one can also assume that each of the three players begins with his own hat of twelve chips and draws without replacement.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fermat thought up this problem and communicated it to P. de Carcavy, who sent it by letter to Huygens on June 22nd, 1656. Huygens wrote back with the correct solution, showing his working in detail, on July 6th, 1656 (Œuvres I, pp. 433–446). Apart from Spinoza’s, solutions were subsequently provided by P.R. de montmort (1678–1719), Essay d’analyse sur les jeux de hazard (2nd ed., Paris, 1713), pp. 216-217; reekening der Kannsen in het Spelen (Amsterdam, 1716), see his Œuvres (Amsterdam, 1912), pp. 32–34. A modern treatment is to be found in Jacques Dutka, ‘Spinoza and the Theory of Probability’, Scripta Mathematica, vol. XIX, no. 1 (March, 1953), pp. 24–33, cf. R. McKeon, ‘Spinoza on the Rainbow and on Probability’, in H.A. Wolfson. Jubilee Volume (Jerusalem, 1965), vol. II, pp. 555–556.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Petry, M.J. (1985). Calculation of Chances. In: Petry, M.J. (eds) Spinoza’s Algebraic Calculation of the Rainbow & Calculation of Chances. Archives Internationales D’Histoire des Idées / International Archives of the History of Ideas, vol 108. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5097-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5097-9_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8753-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-5097-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics