Abstract
The theory called ‘critical dualism’ is one of the most important, but far from the clearest, parts of Karl Popper’s conception of the way history and the human sciences are related to morals and politics1. It is a theory about the relation between the facts or factual laws which the human sciences might discover and the norms or decisions which we might adopt in the face of those facts. Norms and decisions, Popper asserts, cannot be derived from facts; no belief that a certain particular or law-like state of affairs prevails in the world can commit us logically to any decision regarding our conduct. It is for us to decide what to do with regard to any fact that we take to be the case, to alter it if it is alterable, or to oppose attempts by others to alter it.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1985 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Waldron, J. (1985). Making Sense of Critical Dualism. In: Currie, G., Musgrave, A. (eds) Popper and the Human Sciences. Nijhoff International Philosophy Series, vol 19. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5093-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5093-1_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-247-3141-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-5093-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive