Skip to main content

The Relevance of the Joint Committee Standards for Improving Evaluations in Continuing Education in the Health Professions

  • Chapter
Evaluation of Continuing Education in the Health Professions

Part of the book series: Evaluation in Education and Human Services ((EEHS,volume 18))

Abstract

Continuing education has a vital role in assuring that health professionals provide services that are up-to-date and of high quality; and evaluations are needed both to examine critically continuing education and health services, and to provide direction for their improvement. Hence, evaluation has an important role in providing sound health care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abrahamson, S. (1968). “Evaluation in continuing medical education.” Journal of the American Medical Association, 206 (3), 625–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association. (1974). Standards for educational and psychological tests (rev. ed.). Washington, D.C.: APA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkin, Howard et al. (August, 1982). “Letter to the editor.” New England Journal of Medicine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertram, D.A. and Brooks-Bertram, P.A. (1977). “The evaluation of continuing medical education: A literature review.” Health Education Monographs, 5, 330–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braskamp, L.A. and Mayberry, P.W. (1982). A comparison of two sets of standards. Paper presented at the Joint Committee meeting of the Evaluation Network, Evaluation Research Society, Baltimore, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brook, R.H., Williams, K.N., and Avery, A.D. (1976). “Quality assurance today and tomorrow: Forecast for the future.” Annals of Internal Medicine, 85 (6), 809–817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brook, R.H., Davies-Avery, A.D., Greenfield, S., Harris, L.J., Lelah, T., Solomon, N.E., and Ware, J.E. (1977). “Assessing the quality of medical care using outcome measures: An overview of the method.” Supplement to Medical Care, 15 (9).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryk, A. and Light, R. (1981). “Designing evaluation for different program environments.” In R.A. Beck (ed.), Educational evaluation methodology: TH state of the art. Baltimore, Maryland: The Johns Hopkins University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunda, M. (1982). Concerns and techniques in feasibility. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Council for Measurement in Education, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D.T. and Stanley, J.C. (1963). “Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research on teaching.” In N.L. Gage (ed.), Handbook of research on teaching. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, L. (1979). “State-level teacher performance evaluation policies.” Inservice Centerfold. Syracuse, New York: National Council on State and Inservice Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordray, D. (1982). “An assessment of the utility of the ERS standards.” In P.H. Rossi (ed.), Standards for evaluation practice. New Directions for Program Evaluation, No. 15. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. and Associates. (1980). Toward reform of program evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denson, T., Clintworth, B., and Manning, P. (1983). Final report of the office education project. Los Angeles: University of Southern California Development and Demonstration Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • ERS Standards Committee. (1982). “Evaluation research society standards for program evaluation.” In P.H. Rossi (ed.), Standards for evaluation practice. New Directions for Program Evaluation, No. 15. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evered, D.C. and Williams, H.D. (1980). “Postgraduate education and the doctor.” British Medical Journal, March, 626–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, G. (1975). “A paradox about excellence of schools and the people in them.” Educational Researcher, 4, 9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldfinger, S.E. (1982). “Continuing medical education: The case for contamination.” New England Journal of Medicine, 306 (9), 540–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Impara, J.C. (1982). Measurement and the utility standards. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Council for Measurement in Education, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluations. (1981). Standards for evaluation of educational programs, projects, and materials. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, R.L. (1981). “A preliminary look at the applicability of the educational evaluation standards.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 3, 87–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKillip, J. and Garberg, R. A further examination of the overlap between ERS and Joint Committee evaluation standards, Unpublished paper, Southern Illinois University, Department of Psychology, Carbondale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendenhall, R.C., Lloyd, J.S., Repicky, P.A., Monson, J.R., Girard, R.A., and Abrahamson, S. (1978). Journal of the American Medical Association, 240 (11), 1160–1168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merwin, J.C. (1982). Measurement and propriety standards. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Council for Measurement in Education, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevo, D. (1982). Applying the evaluation standards in a different social context. Paper presented at the 20th Congress of the International Association of Applied Psychology, Edinburgh, Scotland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridings, J.M. (1980). Standard setting in accounting and auditing: Considerations for educational evaluation. Unpublished dissertation, Western Michigan University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scriven, M. (1974). “Evaluation perspectives and procedures.” In W.J. Popham (ed.), Evaluation in education: Current applications (pp. 3–93). Berkeley: McCutchan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scriven, M. (1983). “Evaluation ideologies.” In G.F. Madaus, M. Scriven, and D.L. Stufflebeam (eds.), Evaluation models. Hingham, Massachusetts: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibley, J.C., Sackett, D.L., Neufeld, V., Gerrard, B., Rudnick, K.V., and Fraser, W.A. (1982). “Randomized trial of continuing medical education.” New England Journal of Medicine, 306, 511–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. (1975). Program evaluation, particularly responsive evaluation. (Occasional Paper Series, No. 5). Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University Evaluation Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. (1981). “Setting standards for educational evaluators.” Evaluation News, 2 (2), 148–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, L. (August 19, 1982 ). “Letter to the editor.” New England Journal of Medicine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straton, R.B. (1982). Appropriateness and potential impact of programme evaluation standards in Australia. Paper presented at the 20th International Congress of Applied Psychology, Edinburgh, Scotland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stufflebeam, D.L. (1968). “The use of experimental design in educational evaluation.” Journal of Educational Measurement, 8(4), 267–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stufflebeam, D.L. et al. (1971). Educational evaluation and decision making. Itasca, Illinois: F.E. Peacock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stufflebeam, D.L. (1982). An examination of the overlap between ERS and Joint Committee standards. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Evaluation Network, Baltimore, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardrop, J.C. (1982). Measurement and accuracy standards. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Council for Measurement in Education, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wargo, M.J. (1981). “The standards: A federal level perspective.” Evaluation News, 2 (2), 157–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildemuth, B.M. (1981). A bibliography to accompany the Joint Committee’s standards on educational evaluation. (ERIC/TM, Report 81). Princeton, New Jersey: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stufflebeam, D.L. (1985). The Relevance of the Joint Committee Standards for Improving Evaluations in Continuing Education in the Health Professions. In: Abrahamson, S. (eds) Evaluation of Continuing Education in the Health Professions. Evaluation in Education and Human Services, vol 18. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4986-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4986-7_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8707-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-4986-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics