Skip to main content

Understanding Zooplankton Communities in Farm Dams: the Importance of Predation

  • Chapter
Limnology in Australia

Part of the book series: Monographiae Biologicae ((MOBI,volume 61))

Abstract

The species composition, species abundance and size distribution of the zooplankton community of four farm dams in the Adelaide Hills were largely controlled by predation. In three farm dams without fish, winter-spring zooplankton communities were dominated by the large cladoceran Daphnia carinata and a species of the large calanoid Boeckella along with smaller populations of Calamoecia, Ceriodaphnia, Mesocyclops leuckarti and Asplanchna brightwelli. The mean length of zooplankters in each of the dams was 0·95, 1·28 and 1·33 mm, and the largest zooplankters were 3·6 mm. In summer, large populations of the notonectid Anisops deanei decimated the zooplankton and virtually eliminated D. carinata. Mean length of zooplankters in each dam was 0·60, 0·81 and 0·83 mm, and no specimens were more than 1·60 mm. In the dam heavily stocked with redfm (Perca fluviatilis), the zooplankton community was dominated by Tropocyclops sp., Mesocyclops leuckarti, Bosmina meridionalis, Ceriodaphnia spp., Brachionus spp. and Asplanchna spp. D. carinata and calanoids were absent. Mean and maximum sizes of zooplankters were 0·50 and 0·83 mm in winter and 0·37 and 0·80 mm in summer. The roles of dispersal, competition and predation in determining community structure are discussed. Consideration is given to how the type and extent of predation and the environmental conditions might affect the importance of predation in other farm dam or pond systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, R. S. (1980). Relationships between trout and invertebrate species as predators and the structure of the crustacean and rotiferan plankton in mountain lakes. In ‘Evolution and Ecology of Zooplankton Communities’. (Ed. C. W. Kerfoot.) pp. 635–41. (University Press of New England: Hanover.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Arumugam, P. T. (1984). Effects offish predation on zooplankton—an experimental approach. Aust. Soc. Limnol. Newsl. 22, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arumugam, P. T., and Geddes, M. C. (1986). An enclosure for experimental and field studies with fish and zooplankton communities. Hydrobiologia (In press.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayly, I. A. E., Ebsworth, E. P., and Hang Fong Wan. (1975). Studies on the lakes of Fraser Island, Queensland. Aust. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 26, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayly, I. A. E., and Williams, W. D. (1973). ‘Inland Waters and Their Ecology.’ (Longman: Melbourne.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, J. L., and Dodson, S. I. (1965). Predation, body size, and composition of plankton. Science (Wash. D.C.) 150, 28–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. M. (1975). Assembly of species communities. In ‘Ecology and Evolution of Communities’. (Eds M. L. Cody and J. M. Diamond.) pp. 342–444. (Harvard University Press: Cambridge.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodson, S. I. (1974). Zooplankton competition and predation: an experimental test of the size- efficiency hypothesis. Ecology 55, 605–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganf, G. G., and Shiel, R. J. (1985a). Feeding behaviour and limb morphology of two cladocerans with small intersetular distances. Aust. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 36, 69–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganf, G. G., and Shiel, R. J. (1985b). Particle capture by Daphnia carinata. Aust. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 36, 371–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geddes, M. C. (1984). Seasonal studies on the zooplankton community of Lake Alexandrina, River Murray, South Australia, and the role of turbidity in determining zooplankton community structure. Aust. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 35, 417–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, J. W. G., and Bayly, I. A. E. (1981). Predator induction of crests in morphs of the Daphnia carinata King complex. Limnol. Oceanogr. 26, 201–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D. J., Cooper, W. E., and Werner, E. E. (1970). An experimental approach to the production dynamics and structure of freshwater animal communities. Limnol. Oceanogr. 15, 839–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D. J., Threkeld, S. T., Burns, C. W., and Crowly, P. H. (1976). The size efficiency hypothesis and the size structure of zooplankton communities. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 7, 177–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. J., Fletcher, A. R., and Morrison, A. K. (1983). Carp program. Final report. Fisheries and Wildlife Division, Ministry for Conservation, Victoria. Rep. No. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert, S. H., and Mulla, M. S. (1981). Impacts of mosquito fish (Gambusia affinis) predation on plankton communities. Hydrobiologia 83, 125–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, G. E. (1967). ‘A Treatise on Limnology. Vol. II. Introduction to Lake Biology and the Limnoplankton.’ (John Wiley & Sons: New York.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, V. H. (1966). The limnetic crustacea of six reservoirs in the Sydney area of New South Wales. Verh. Int. Ver. Limnol. 16, 727–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerfoot, W. C. (1977). Implications of copepod predation. Limnol. Oceanogr. 22, 316–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerfoot, W. C. (1980). ‘Evolution and Ecology of Zooplankton Communities.’ (University Press of New England: Hanover.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerfoot, W. C., and DeMott, W. R. (1980). Foundations for evaluating community interactions: the use of enclosures to investigate co-existence of Daphnia and Bosmina. In ‘Evolution and Ecology of Zooplankton Communities’. (Ed. W. D. Kerfoot.) pp. 725$#x2013;41. (University Press of New England: Hanover.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehl, M. A. R., and Strickler, J. R. (1981). Copepod feeding currents: food capture at low Reynolds number. Limnol. Oceanogr. 26, 1062–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, P. A. (1978). Role of invertebrate predation in structuring zooplankton communities. Verh. Int. Ver. Limnol. 26, 480–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langeland, A. (1978). Effect of fish (Salvelinus alpinus, arctic char) predation on the zooplankton in ten Norwegian lakes. Verh. Int. Ver. Limnol. 20, 2065–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, L. N., Arthrington, A. H., and Milton, D. A. (1986). The mosquitofish—a valuable mosquito-control agent or a pest? In ‘The Ecology of Exotic Plants and Animals in Australia’. (Ed. R. J. Kitching.) Ch. 2. (John Wiley & Sons: Brisbane.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. (1979). Predation, competition, and zooplankton community structure: an experimental study. Limnol. Oceanogr. 24, 253–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maly, E. J. (1984a). Interspecific copulation in and co-occurrence of similar-sized freshwater centropagid copepods. Aust. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 35, 153–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maly, E. J. (1984b). Dispersal ability and relative abundance of Boeckella and Calamoecia (Copepoda: Calanoida) in Australian and New Zealand waters. Oecologia (Berl.) 62, 173–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, R. M. (1980). Family Percidae. Freshwater perches. In ‘Freshwater Fishes of South Eastern Australia’. (Ed. R. M. McDowall.) pp. 158–9. (A. H. & A. W. Reed Pty Ltd: Sydney.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrick, J. R., and Schmida, G. E. (1984). ‘Australian Freshwater Fishes.’ (Griffin Press: Adelaide.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, B. D., and Williams, W. D. (1982). Factors influencing the seasonal occurrence and abundance of the zooplankton in two waste stabilization ponds. Aust. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 33, 989–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niell, W. E. (1975). Experimental studies of microcrustacean competition, community composition and efficiency of resource utilization. Ecology 56, 809–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, N. A., and Pejler, B. (1973). On the relation between fish fauna and zooplankton opposition in north Swedish lakes. Inst. Freshwater Res. Drottningholm Rep. 53, 51–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, W. J., and Vinyard, G. L. (1978). Polymorphism and predation: the effect of invertebrate predation on the distribution of two varieties of Daphnia carinata in south India ponds. Limnol. Oceanogr. 23, 452–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paffenhofer, G. A. (1984). Does Paracalanus feed with a leaky sieve? Limnol. Oceanogr. 29, 155–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, K. G., and McDonough, R. (1984). The energetic cost of response to blue-green algal filaments by cladocerans. Limnol. Oceanogr. 29(2), 365–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, J. G., and Geddes, M. C. (1984). Functional response analysis of size-selective predation by the notonectid predator Anisops deanei (Brooks) on Daphnia thomsoni (Sars). Aust. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 35, 725–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, M. A., and Murdoch, W. W. (1983). Selective predation by the back swimmer Notonecta. Limnol. Oceanogr. 28(2), 352–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiel, R. J., Walker, K. F., and Williams, W. D. (1982). Plankton of the lower River Murray, South Australia. Aust. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 33, 301–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprules, W. G. (1984). Towards an optimal classification of zooplankton for lake ecosystem studies. Verh. Int. Ver. Limnol. 22, 320–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprules, W. G., and Holtby, L. B. (1979). Body size and feeding ecology as alternatives to taxonomy for the study of limnetic zooplankton community structure. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 36, 1354–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprules, W. G., Holtby, L. B., and Griggs, G. (1981). A microcomputer-based measuring device for biological research. Can. J. Zool. 59, 1611–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stensen, J. A. E. (1972). Fish predation effects on the species composition of the zooplankton community in eight small forest lakes. Inst. Freshwater Res. Drottningholm Rep. 52, 132–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stensen, J. A. E. (1979). Predator-prey relations between fish and invertebrate prey in some forest lakes. Inst. Freshwater Res. Drottningholm Rep. 58, 166–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tait, R. D. (1976). A study of some Victorian farm dams with special reference to microcrustaceans. B.Sc. Hons Thesis, Monash University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tait, R. D., Shiel, R. J., and Koste, W. (1984). Structure and dynamics of zooplankton communities, Alligator Rivers Region, N.T., Australia. Hydrobiologia 113, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timms, B. V. (1970a). Chemical and zooplankton studies on lentic habitats of north-eastern New South Wales. Aust. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 21, 11–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Timms, B. V. (1970b). Aspects of the limnology of five small reservoirs in New South Wales. Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 95, 46–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timms, B. V. (1980). Farm dams. In ‘An Ecological Basis for Water Resource Management’. (Ed. W. D. Williams.) pp. 345 - 89. (Australian National University Press: Canberra.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Timms, R. M., and Moss, B. (1984). Prevention of growth of potentially dense phytoplankton populations by zooplankton grazing, in the presence of zooplanktonivorous fish, in a shallow wetland ecosystem. Limnol. Oceanogr. 29(3), 472–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaret, T. M. (1980). ‘Predation and Freshwater Communities.’ (Yale University Press: New Haven.)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 CSIRO — Australia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Geddes, M.C. (1986). Understanding Zooplankton Communities in Farm Dams: the Importance of Predation. In: De Deckker, P., Williams, W.D. (eds) Limnology in Australia. Monographiae Biologicae, vol 61. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4820-4_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4820-4_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8636-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-4820-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics