Skip to main content

Monthly versus Annual Revisions of Concurrent Seasonally Adjusted Series

  • Chapter
Time Series and Econometric Modelling

Part of the book series: The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science ((WONS,volume 36))

Abstract

Statistics Canada’s official policy of using concurrent seasonal adjustment was established in 1975; gradually, other foreign statistical agencies followed it. The old practice for seasonally adjusting a current (monthly or quarterly) observation was to apply year-ahead seasonal factors generated from a series that ended in the month of December of the previous year. Since these projected factors were calculated ahead of the actual time they were applied, they didn’t take into account the most recent information incorporated into the series. On the other hand, the use of a concurrent seasonal factor to produce a current seasonally adjusted datum implies the use of all the data in the series up to and including the current month’s observation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Box, G. E. P., and G. M. Jenkins (1970), Time Series Analysis, Forecasting and Control. San Francisco: Holden-Day.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bayer, A., and D. Wilcox (1981), “An evaluation of concurrent seasonal adjustment”. Technical Report, Washington, D. C. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Special Studies Section.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burridge, P., and K. F. Wallis (1984), “Unobserved-components models for seasonal adjustment filters”. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 2, 350–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dagum, E. B. (1978), Comparison and Assessment of Seasonal Adjustment Methods for Labor Force Series. Washington, D. C: U. S. Government Printing Office, Stock No. 052–003–00603–1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagum, E. B. (1980), The X-11-ARIMA Seasonal Adjustment Method. Ottawa: Statistics Canada Catalogue No. 12–564E.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagum, E. B. (1982a), “The effects of asymmetric filters on seasonal factor revisions”. Journal of the American Statistical Association 77, 732–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dagum, E. B. (1982b), “Revisions of seasonally adjusted data due to filter changes”. Proceedings of the Business and Economic Statistics Section, American Statistical Association, pp. 39–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagum, E. B. (1983), “Spectral properties of the concurrent and forecasting linear filters of the X-11-ARIMA method”. Canadian Journal of Statistics 2, 73–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dagum, E. B., and M. Morry (1984), “Basic issues on the seasonal adjustment of the Canadian consumer price index”. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 2, 250–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, P., and J. Durbin (1982), “Local trend estimation and seasonal adjustment of economic time series”. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 145, 1–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, S. (1982), “An evaluation of concurrent adjustment on Census Bureau time series”. Proceedings of the Business and Economic Statistics Section, American Statistical Association, pp. 46–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, S. (1984), “Concurrent seasonal adjustment with Census X-11”. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 2, 235–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, D., and S. McKenzie (1985), “On concurrent seasonal adjustment”. Special Studies No. 164, U. S. Federal Reserve Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiskin, J., A. H. Young, and J. C. Musgrave (1967), “The X-11 variant of census method II seasonal adjustment program”. Technical Paper 15, Washington, D. C.: U. S. Bureau of Census.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallis, K. F. (1974), “Seasonal adjustment and relations between variables”. Journal of the American Statistical Association 69, 18–31.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Young, A. H. (1968), “Linear approximations to the census and BLS seasonal adjustment methods”. Journal of the American Statistical Association 63, 445–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dagum, E.B. (1987). Monthly versus Annual Revisions of Concurrent Seasonally Adjusted Series. In: MacNeill, I.B., Umphrey, G.J., Carter, R.A.L., McLeod, A.I., Ullah, A. (eds) Time Series and Econometric Modelling. The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, vol 36. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4790-0_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4790-0_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8624-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-4790-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics