Abstract
Although Peter Abelard was the most distinguished teacher of logic of his time, a logic understood to be the science of argumentative discourse, he was not destined to found a new philosophical tradition. The historical situation offers at least a partial explanation — the pace of philosophical and theological research was so brisk in the twelfth century that many of the established schools enjoyed life spans of at most two or three generations of teachers. The restlessness of the times is embodied to a special degree in Abelard.1 His writings include commentaries, in many cases several to a work, on the logical works of Aristotle and Porphyry then available, handed down in the form of Boethius’ translations, and on Boethius’ own logical works. Abelard has to take a number of positions into consideration here: several commentaries on Aristotle by ancient scholars, by Boethius, and by Abelard’s own predecessors and teachers, and furthermore the grammatical theories of Priscian and those deriving from Abelard’s contemporaries. He discovers with distinctive acumen that the tradition he is examining is disunited and full of tensions on basic questions. It is in the analysis and discussion of these tensions that he finds the field of his own philosophical research. He expects to reach solutions by intensifying the controversies, not by seeking harmony. Thus he traces argument and counter-argument in great thoroughness of detail and from a dizzying succession of points of view, abandoning theses and offering countertheses. What his students could learn from him was not so much a particular theory as his method of formulating and discussing problems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Aristotle, De Interpretatione, ed. L. Minio-Paluello, Oxford, 1949; Translatio Boethii, ed. L. Minio-Paluello, Aristoteles Latinus II 1–2 (Corpus Philosophorum jnedii aevi Academiarum consociatarum auspiciis et consilio editum), Desclee de Brouwer, Bruges — Paris, 1965.
Aristotle, Topica, W. D. Ross, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1958.
Boethius, Commentarii in librum Aristotelis ΠEPI EPMHNEIAΣ, ed. C. Meiser. Prima editio III, Teubner, Leipzig, 1877; Secunda editio III, Teubner, Leipzig, 1880. Boethius, De differentiis topicis, Patrologia Latina, 64.
Peter Abelard, Dialectica, ed. L. M. de Rijk, Van Gorcurn, Assen, 1956, 21970.
Peter Abelard, Glossae super Peri ermeneias, ed. B. Geyer, in Peter Abaelards Philosophische Schriften, I. Die Logica ‘Ingredientibus’, (BGPhThMA 21,3), Aschendorff, Münster, 1927.
Peter Abelard, Glossae super Periermenias B, capp. XII — XIV, ed. L. Minio-Paluello, in Twelfth Century Logic. Texts and Studies II: Abaelardiana Inedita, edizioni di Storia e Letteratura, Roma, 1958.
Peter Abelard, Glossae super Praedicamenta Aristotelis, ed. B. Geyer, in Peter Abaelards Phifosophische Schriften I. Die Logica ‘Ingredientibus’ (BGPhThMA 21,2), Aschendorff, Münster, 1921.
Peter Abelard, Glossae super Topica, ed. M. dal Pra, in Pietro Abelardo, Scritti filosofici, Fratelli Bocca, Roma-Milano, 1954.
Priscian, Institutionum grammaticarum libri XVIII, ed. M. Hertz (Grammatici Latini, rec. H. Keil, II, III), Teubner, Leipzig, 1855.
Thomas Aquinas, In libros Peri Hermeneias Expositio, ed. T. M. Spiazzi, Marietti, Rome, 1950.
William of Sherwood, Syncategoremata, ed. J. R. O’Donnell, Mediaeval Studies 3 (1941), 46–93.
Häring, N. M., ‘Abelard Yesterday and Today’, in Pierre Abélard — Pierre le Vénérable, Actes du Colloque international, Cluny, 2-9 juillet 1972, ed. R. Louis, J. Jolivet, J. Chanllon, Editions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris, 1975, pp. 341–403.
Jacobi, K., ‘Diskussionen iiber Pradikationstheorie in den logischen Schriften des Petrus Abailardus. Versuch einer Ubersicht’, in Petrus Abaelardus (1079-/142). Person, Werk und Wirkung; ed. R. Thomas (Trierer Theol. Studien, Bd. 38), Paulinus, Trier, 1980, pp. 165–179.
Jacobi, K., ‘Die Semantik sprachlicher Ausdriicke, Ausdrucksfolgen und Aussagen in Abailards Kommentar zu Peri herrneneias’, Medioevo (1981), 41–89.
Jolivet, J., Arts du Langage et théologie chez Abélard (Études de Philosophie Médiévale 57), J. Vrin, Paris, 1969.
Kretzmann, N., ‘Syncategorernata, exponibilia, sophismata’, in The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy, ed. N. Kretzrnann, A. Kenny, J. Pinborg, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1982, pp. 211–241.
Maierù, A., Terminologia logica della tarda scolastica, Edizioni dell’ Ateneo, Roma, 1972.
Moody, E. A., Truth and Consequence in Mediaeval Logic (Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics), North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, 1953.
Nuchelmans, G., Theories of the Proposition. Ancient and medieval conceptions of the bearers of truth and falsity, North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, 1973.
Pinborg, J., Logik und Semantik in Mittelalter. Ein Uberblick, Frommann-Holzboog, Stuttgart — Bad Canstatt, 1972.
Rijk, L. M. de, Logica Modernorum. II-I: The Origin and Early Development of the Theory of Supposition, Van Gorcum, Assen, 1967.
Rijk, L. M. de, ‘La signification de la proposition (dictum propositionis) chez Abélard’, in Pierre Abelard — Pierre le venerable, Actes du Colloque International, Cluny, 2 — 9 Juillet 1972, ed. R. Louis, J. Jolivet, J. Châtillon, Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris, 1975, pp. 547–555.
Rijk, L. M. de, ‘Peter Abälard (1079-1142): Meister und Opfer des Scharfsinns’, in Petrus Abaelardus (1079-1142). Person. Werk und Wirkung, ed. R. Thomas (Trierer Theol. Studien, Bd. 38), Paulinus, Trier, 1980, pp. 125–138.
Rijk, L. M. de, ‘Die Wirkung der neuplatonischen Semantik auf das mittelalterliche Denken über das Sein’, in Sprache und Erkenntnis im Mittelalter, Miscellanea Mediaevalia, Bd. 13/1, De Gruyter, Berlin-New York, 1981, pp. 19–35.
Rijk, L. M. de, ‘Abailard’s Semantic Views in the Light of Later Developments’, in English Logic and Semantics. Acts of the 4th European Symposium on Mediaeval Logic and Semantics, Leiden — Nijmegen, 23-27 April 1979, ed. by H. A. G. Braakhuis, C. H. Kneepkens, and L. M. de Rijk (Artistarium Supplementa I), Nijmegen, 1981, pp. 1–58.
Tweedale, M. M., Abailard on Universals, North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam — New York — Oxford, 1976.
Tweedale, M. M., ‘Abelard and the Culmination of the Old Logic’, in The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy, ed. N. Kretzmann, A. Kenny, and J. Pinborg, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1932, pp. 143–157.
Zimmermann, A., “Ipsum enim <‘est’> nihil est’ (Aristoteles Periherm. I, c. 3). Thomas von Aquin über die Bedeutung der Kopula’, in Miscellanea Mediaevalia 8, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin-New York, 1971, pp. 282–295.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1986 D. Reidel Publishing Company
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jacobi, K. (1986). Peter Abelard’s Investigations into the Meaning and Functions of the Speech Sign ‘Est’. In: Knuuttila, S., Hintikka, J. (eds) The Logic of Being. Synthese Historical Library, vol 28. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4780-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4780-1_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-277-2371-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-4780-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive