Abstract
Intention is associated with practical reasoning — that is, with our ability to evaluate and select goals, plan means to achieve them, and carry out those plans at appropriate moments. Thus accounts of intention tend naturally to focus on the relationship between actions that are intentional and mental antecedents involved in practical reasoning. Some of these accounts are reductionist: they do not allow for independent mental states of intending, but rather seek to reduce intention to other states, often a combination of desire and belief which, when they cause behavior of an appropriate kind, are held to issue in an intentional action. Theories of this kind tend to overlook important features of intending that distinguish it from desire and belief, and hence have difficulty explaining what it is even to have an intention, much less what it is to act intentionally. Other theories of intention eschew reductionism. They treat practical reasoning as issuing in mental states of intending which differ from desire and belief, and out of which action develops at the appropriate time. These views are able to give a better account of cases where action is preceded by full deliberation, but they too tend to make intentionality depend on a relationship between action and prior states of the agent.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Audi, Robert: 1973, ‘Intending’, The Journal of Philosophy 70, 387–403.
Audi, Robert: 1986, ‘Intending, Intentional Action, and Desire’, in Joel Marks (ed.), The Ways of Desire, Precedent Publishing Co., Chicago, 1986, forthcoming.
Brand, Myles: 1984, Intending and Acting, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Bratman, Michael: 1983, ‘Castañeda’s Theory of Thought and Action’, in J. E. Tomberlin (ed.), Agent, Language, and the Structure of the World, Hackett Publishing Co., Indianapolis, Indiana.
Castañeda, Hector-Neri: 1975, Thinking and Doing, D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht and Boston.
Chisholm, Roderick M.: 1966, ‘Freedom and Action’, in Keith Lehrer (ed.), Freedom and Determinism, Random House, New York.
Davidson, Donald: 1980a, ‘Actions, Reasons, and Causes’, in Davidson, Essays on Actions and Events, Oxford University Press, London and New York.
Davidson, Donald: 1980b, ‘Intending’, in Davidson, Essays on Actions and Events, Oxford University Press, London and New York.
Frankfurt, H. G.: 1978, ‘The Problem of Action’, American Philosophical Quarterly 15, 157–162.
Goldman, Alvin I.: 1976, A Theory of Human Action, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
Harman, Gilbert: 1976, ‘Practical Reasoning’, The Review of Metaphysics 29, 431–463.
Hornsby, Jennifer: 1980, Actions, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London and Boston.
McCann, Hugh J.: 1974, ‘Volition and Basic Action’, The Philosophical Review 83, 451–473.
McCann, Hugh J.: 1975, ‘Trying, Paralysis, and Volition’, The Review of Metaphysics 28, 423–442.
McCann, Hugh J.: 1985, ‘Rationality and the Range of Intention’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 10, 191–211.
O’Shaughnessy, Brian: 1980, The Will: A Dual Aspect Theory, Cambridge University Press, London and New York.
Ryle, Gilbert: 1949, The Concept of Mind, Hutchinson and Co., London.
Searle, John R.: 1983, Intentionality, Cambridge University Press, London and New York.
Sellars, Wilfrid: 1966, Thought and Action’, in Keith Lehrer (ed.), Freedom and Determinism, Random House, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1986 D. Reidel Publishing Company
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McCann, H.J. (1986). Intrinsic Intentionality. In: Audi, R. (eds) Action, Decision, and Intention. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4696-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4696-5_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8588-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-4696-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive