Abstract
Despite a common interest in ‘logical structure’, often pursued with model-theoretic tools, logical semantics and philosophy of science are nowadays disparate subjects. There have been prominent philosophers whose work spans both fields: Carnap, Reichenbach, Quine and Putnam, to mention some resounding names. But even with these, combination does not necessarily mean integration. This lack of contact is somewhat surprising, as several natural bridge topics exist, such as the area of natural laws/counterfactuals/modality or modality/tense/ time. Indeed, the difference between formal semantics of natural language (sentences or texts) and that of scientific theories seems only a gradual one, in the level of ‘logical aggregation’.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1986 D. Reidel Publishing Company
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Van Benthem, J. (1986). Logical Semantics as an Empirical Science. In: Essays in Logical Semantics. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 29. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4540-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4540-1_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-277-2092-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-4540-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive