Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Stichting Foundation Rembrandt Research Project Foundation ((RRSE,volume 2))

  • 228 Accesses

Abstract

A generally well preserved and undoubtedly original painting, reliably signed and dated 1631.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 859.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kühn, p. 196; The Frick Collection. An illustrated catalogue I, Paintings..., New York 1968, pp. 252 –257.

    Google Scholar 

  2. W. Bode, Studien zur Geschichte der holländischen Malerei, Braunschweig 1883, pp. 382 383.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. F. van Bemmelen, ‘Identificatie van familie-portretten’, Jaarboek... Amstelodamum 26 (1929), pp. 59 77.

    Google Scholar 

  4. I. H. v[an] Efeghen], ‘Voor wie schilderde Rembrandt het portret van Nicolaas Ruts?’, Amstelodamum. Maandblad… 64 (1977), pp. 97–101.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gerson 54; Br.-Gerson 146.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Y. Kuznetsov in: Rembrandt Harmensz van Rijn. Paintings from Soviet Museums, Leningrad [c. 1971], no. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. Michel, Rembrandt, Paris 1893, pp. 116–117.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cf. J. Bauch and D. Eckstein, ‘Woodbiological investigations on panels of Rembrandt paintings’, Wood Science and Technology 15 (1981), pp. 251–263, esp. 254

    Google Scholar 

  9. Catalogue Stockholm Nationalmuseum, Äldre utländska målningar och skulpturer, 1958, p. 164 no. 1349.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Br.-Gerson 609, p. 613.

    Google Scholar 

  11. HdG 181

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Rosenberg, Rembrandt. Life and Work, London 1964, 2nd edn, p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  13. W. P. Coolhaas, Het Huis’De Dubbele Arend’, Amsterdam 1973, pp. 29–62, esp. 58. Cf. A. Bredius, Kunstler-Inventare V, The Hague 1918, p. 1613

    Google Scholar 

  14. W. Bode, Studien zur Geschichte der holländischen Malerei, Braunschweig 1883, pp. 417, 420-21.

    Google Scholar 

  15. HdG 698.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Br. 85.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bauch 455.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gerson p. 262.

    Google Scholar 

  19. H. F. Wijnman, ‘Rembrandt en Hendrick Uylenburgh te Amsterdam’, Amstelodamum. Maandblad43 (1956), pp. 94–103, esp. 95, 101, 103.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Catalogue Stockholm Nationalmuseum. Aidere utländska mälningar och skulpturer, Stockholm 1958, p. 163, no. 583

    Google Scholar 

  21. i HdG 699.

    Google Scholar 

  22. De Vries, Tôth-Ubbens, Froentjes, pp. 82 113, esp. 83.

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. Jordan, ‘Bemerkungen zu einigen Bildern Rembrandts’, Repertorium für Kunstwissenschaft 7 (1884), pp. 183-187, esp. 185–186.

    Google Scholar 

  24. W. S. Heckscher, Rembrandt’s Anatomy of Dr. Nicolaas Tulp. An iconological study, New York 1958, pp. 18 and 123, note 1.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Musée Royal de Tableaux Mauritshuis à la Haye. Catalogue raisonné des tableaux et sculptures, 3rd edn, The Hague 1935, pp. 275–278.

    Google Scholar 

  26. I. H. v[an] E[eghen], ‘De Anatomische Lessen van Rembrandt’, Amstelodamum. Maandblad… 35 (1948), pp. 34 36.

    Google Scholar 

  27. I. H. v[an] Efeghen], ‘Rembrandt en de mensenvilders’, Amstelodamum. Maandblad… 56 (1969), pp. 1 11.

    Google Scholar 

  28. C. E. Kellett, ‘The Anatomy Lesson of Dr. Tulp’, Burl. Mag. 101 (1959), pp. 150 152.

    Google Scholar 

  29. G. Wolf-Heidegger and A. M. Cetto, Die anatomische Sektion in bildlicher Darstellung, Basle New York 1967, pp. 308–310.

    Google Scholar 

  30. W. Schupbach, The paradox of Rembrandt’s ‘Anatomy of Dr. Tulp’ (Medical History, Supplement no. 2), London (Wellcome Institute for the History of Medicine) 1982, esp. p. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  31. E. K.J. Reznicek, ‘Opmerkingen bij Rembrandt’, O.H. 91 (1977), pp. 75–107, esp. 84.

    Google Scholar 

  32. A. Querido, ‘De anatomie van de Anatomische Les’, O.H. 82 (1967), pp. 128 136, esp. 136.

    Google Scholar 

  33. E. van Biema, ‘L’histoire d’un chef-d’oeuvre’, Revue de Belgique, 1900 (offprint pp. 3 9, esp. 6).

    Google Scholar 

  34. H. Jantzen, ‘Rembrandt, Tulp und Vesal’, Kunst und Künstler 24 (1926), PP- 3I3–3I4

    Google Scholar 

  35. M. P. Carpentier Alting and Tj. W. Waterbolk, ‘Nieuw licht op de anatomie van de “Anatomische Les van Dr. Nicolaas Tulp”’, O.H. 92 (1978), pp. 43 48.

    Google Scholar 

  36. HdG Urk., no. 369.

    Google Scholar 

  37. HdG Urk., no. 389.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Amsterdam City Archives. Archives of the Surgeons’ Guild no. 216, p. 182. See also [A.] Geyl, ‘Kleine bijdragen tot de geschiedenis van de schilderijen van ‘t Amsterdamsche Chirurgijnsgild, o. a. van de Anatomische Les van Rembrandt’, O.H. 24 (1906), pp. 38 40.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Amsterdam City Archives. Archives of the Surgeons’ Guild no. 216, p. 217. See also [A.] Geyl, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Amsterdam City Archives. Archives of the Surgeons’ Guild no. 218, p. 144. See also [A.] Geyl, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Amsterdam City Archives. Archives of the Surgeons’ Guild no. 218, p. 377.

    Google Scholar 

  42. J. W. R. Tilanus, Beschrijving der schilderijen, afkomstig van het Chirurgijns-gild te Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1865, p. 9 and pp. 21, note 7 and 36, note 48.

    Google Scholar 

  43. E. van Biema, ‘De verhuizing van de Anatomische les naar Den Haag’, De Gids 60 (1896), Part 4, pp. 560 - 564

    Google Scholar 

  44. A. Bredius, ‘Un portrait de Rembrandt découvert dans la collection Holford’, Courrier de l’Art 7 (1887), pp. 21–22; C. Vosmaer, ‘Martin Looten door Rembrandt’, Nederlandsche Spectator 1887, p. 35.

    Google Scholar 

  45. J. F. M. Sterck, W. J. Kat and F. Schmidt-Degener,] ‘Het schrift op Rembrandt’s portret van Marten Looten’, Amstelodamum. Maandblad... 20 (1933), pp. 7–12; Strauss Doc., 1632/1.

    Google Scholar 

  46. J. F. L.] de Balbian Verster, ‘Rembrandt’s portret van Marten Looten (1632)’, Amstelodamum. Maandblad... 19 (1932), pp. 83–85. J. G. van Dillen, ‘Marten Looten en zijn portret’, Tijdschrift voor geschiedenis 54 (1939), pp. 181-190. P. van Eeghen, ‘Eensaem was mij Amsterdam’, Amstelodamum. Maandblad... 44 (1957), pp. 150–154

    Google Scholar 

  47. A. Bredius and G. H. Veth, ‘Poulus Lesire’, O.H. 5 (1887), pp. 45–51, esp. 51.

    Google Scholar 

  48. A. Bredius, ‘De portretten van Joris de Caullery’, O.H. 11 (1893), pp. 127–128; Strauss Doc., 1654/9 and 1661/7.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Bauch 1966, 359.

    Google Scholar 

  50. H. Kühn, ‘Untersuchungen zu den Pigmenten und Malgründen Rem- brandts durchgeführt an den Gemälden der Staatlichen Kunstsammlungen Kassel’, Maltechnik, Restauro 82 (1976), pp. 25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  51. H. F. Wijnman, ’Mr. Lieven van Coppenol, Schoolmeester-Calligraaf, Jaarboek... Amstelodamum 30 (1933), pp. 93-187, esp. 157–158.

    Google Scholar 

  52. J. A. Emmens, ‘Natuur, Onderwijzing en Oefening. Bij een drieluik van Gerard Dou’ in: Album Discipulorum J. G. van Gelder 1963, pp. 125–136.

    Google Scholar 

  53. W. R. Valentiner, ‘Opmerkingen over enkele schilderijen van Rembrandt’, Onze Kunst 11 (1907), pp. 157–168, esp. 162.

    Google Scholar 

  54. H. E. van Gelder, ‘Marginalia bij Rembrandt I. De pendant van Maurits Huygens’, O.H. 60 (1943), pp. 33–34.

    Google Scholar 

  55. K. E. Waterhouse, An exhibition of paintings by Rembrandt arranged by the Arts Council of Great Britain for the Edinburgh Festival Society, Plaistow 1950, no. 5; J. G. van Gelder, ‘The Rembrandt exhibition of Edinburgh’, Burl. Mag. 92 (1950), p. 328; H. E. van Gelder, ‘Rembrandts portretjes van M. Huygens en J. de Gheyn III’, O.H. 68 (1953), p. 107.

    Google Scholar 

  56. S. Slive, Rembrandt and his critics 1630–1730, The Hague 1953, p. 19; H. E. van Gelder, ‘Constantijn Huygens en Rembrandt’, O.H. 74 (1959), pp. 174–178, esp. 176; Else Kai Sass, Comments on Rembrandt’s Passion paintings and Constantijn Huygens’s iconography, Copenhagen 1971 (Det Kon- gelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab, Historisk-Filosofiske Skrifter 5, 3), esp. p. 54.

    Google Scholar 

  57. H. E. van Gelder, Ikonografie van Constantijn Huygens en de lijnen, ’s-Graven- hage 1957, p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  58. P. Murray, Dulwich Picture Gallery. A catalogue, London 1980, p. 101.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Strauss Doc., 1633/1.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Cf. J. Bauch and D. Eckstein, ‘Woodbiological investigations on panels of Rembrandt paintings’, Wood science and technology 15 (1981), pp 251–263, esp. 260.

    Google Scholar 

  61. H. E. van Gelder, Ikonografie van Constantijn Huygens en de zijnen, The Hague 1957, pp. 8-9 (nos. 1 and 2).

    Google Scholar 

  62. HdG 573.

    Google Scholar 

  63. W. Buchanan, Memoirs of painting I, London 1824, PP- 18–19, 196.

    Google Scholar 

  64. C. H. Collins Baker, Catalogue of the Petworth Collection of pictures in the possession of Lord Leconfield, London 1920, p. 101, no. 183.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Cat. exhibition Primitives to Picasso, London (Royal Academy of Arts) 1962, no. 124

    Google Scholar 

  66. Br. 155.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Gerson 108. Cat. exh. The impact of a genius. Rembrandt, his pupils and followers in the seventeenth century, Amsterdam (K. & V. Waterman) 1983, p. 86, no. II

    Google Scholar 

  68. W. Bode, ‘Die Bildnisse der Saskia van Uylenborch als Braut und junge Gattin Rembrandts’, Jb. d. Pr. Kunsts. 18 (1897), pp. 82–91, esp. 83-84.

    Google Scholar 

  69. H. Gerson, ‘Rembrandt’s portret van Amalia van Solms’, O.H. 84 (1969), pp. 244–249.

    Google Scholar 

  70. A. Staring, ‘Vraagstukken der Oranje-Iconographie III, Conterfeitte Rembrandt Frederik Hendrik en Amalia van Solms?’, O.H. 68 (1953), pp. 12–24.

    Google Scholar 

  71. HdG 612. J. Foucart in: exhibition catalogue, Le siecle de Rembrandt, Paris 1970/71, p. 172

    Google Scholar 

  72. Br.-Gerson 334.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Portrait of a lady by Rembrandt’, Burl. Mag. 2 (1903), p. 360.

    Google Scholar 

  74. N. Stolow, J. F. Hanlan and R. Boyer, ‘Element distribution in cross- sections of paintings studied by the X-ray macroprobe’, Studies in Conservation 14 (1969), PP-

    Google Scholar 

  75. M. Kahr, ‘Rembrandt’s Esther. A painting and an etching newly interpreted and dated’, O.H. 81 (1966), pp. 228–244.

    Google Scholar 

  76. HdG 311.

    Google Scholar 

  77. W. Bode and C. Hofstede de Groot, Rembrandt. Beschreibendes Verzeichnis seiner Gemälde… I, Paris 1897, no- 49-

    Google Scholar 

  78. Br- 494-

    Google Scholar 

  79. H. Kauffmann, ‘Rembrandt und die Humanisten vom Muiderkring’, Jb. d. Pr. Kunsts. 41 (1920), pp. 46–81, esp. 76. Cf. C. Hofstede de Groot, ‘Rembrandt. Bijbelsche en historische voorstellingen’, O.H. 41 (1923–24), pp. 49–59, 97–114, esp. 57–58; K. von Baudissin, ‘Rembrandt und Cats’, Repertorium für Kunstwissenschaft 45 (1925), pp. 148–179, esp. 156.

    Google Scholar 

  80. W. S. Heckscher, Rembrandt’s Anatomy of Dr Micolaas Tulp, New York 1958, p. 118

    Google Scholar 

  81. Cf. J. Bauch and D. Eckstein, ‘Woodbiological investigations on panels of Rembrandt paintings’, Wood Science and Technology 15 (1981), pp. 251-263, esp. 254.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Kühn, p. 201.

    Google Scholar 

  83. E. Kai Sass, Comments on Rembrandt’s Passion paintings and Constantijn Huygens’s iconography, Copenhagen 1971 (Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab, Historisk-Filosofiske Skrifter 5, 3), esp. pp. 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  84. W. Stechow, ‘Rembrandts Darstellungen der Kreuzabnahme’, Jb. d. Pr. Kunsts. 50 (1929), pp. 217–232, esp. 220–222.

    Google Scholar 

  85. E. Brochhagen, ‘Beobachtungen an den Passionsbildern Rembrandts in München’, Munuscula discipulorum... Hans Kaufmann zum yo. Geburtstag 1966, Berlin 1968, pp. 37–43, esp. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  86. C. G. Campbell, Studies in the formal sources of Rembrandt’s figure compositions, typescript dissertation University of London 1971, p. 38.

    Google Scholar 

  87. G. Lengl, ‘Beiträge zu den Bildern Rembrandts in der Alten Pinakothek in München’, Das Münster 20 (1967), pp. 52–58, esp. 52; Gerson 65; H. von Einem, ‘Bemerkungen zum Christusbild Rembrandts’, Das Münster 25 (1972), pp. 349–360, esp. 349.

    Google Scholar 

  88. H. Kauffmann, ‘Overzicht der litteratuur betreffende Nederlandschekunst... ’, O.H. 48 (1931), pp. 227-240, esp. 234.

    Google Scholar 

  89. O. Benesch, Rembrandt. Werk und Forschung, Vienna 1935, p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  90. B. P. J. Broos, ‘Rembrandt borrows from Altdorfer’, Simiolus 4 (1970), pp. 100–108, esp. 105–106.

    Google Scholar 

  91. J. Bruyn, Rembrandt’s keuze van bijbelse onderwerpen, Utrecht 1959 (lecture), p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  92. HdG 134.

    Google Scholar 

  93. O. Benesch, Rembrandt. Werk und Forschung, Vienna 1935, p. 21; Ben. 100.

    Google Scholar 

  94. J. Giltay, ‘Een onbekende schets van Rembrandt’, De kroniek van het Rembrandthuis 29 (1977), pp. 1–9, fig. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  95. E. Haverkamp Begemann, review of Benesch, Drawings, in: Kunstchronik 14 (1961), pp. 51–52; E. Haverkamp Begemann, ‘Purpose and Style: Oil Sketches of Rubens, Jan Brueghel, Rembrandt’, Stil und Ueberlieferung in der Kunst des Abendlandes (Akten des 21. Internationalen Kongresses für Kunstgeschichte in Bonn 1964, Vol. III: Theorien und Probleme ), Berlin 1967, p. 109.

    Google Scholar 

  96. C. and A. Tümpel, exh. cat. Rembrandt legt die Bibel aus, Berlin 1970, no. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  97. J. Smith, A catalogue raisonné of the most eminent Dutch, Flemish and French painters... VII, London 1836, no. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  98. HdG 14.

    Google Scholar 

  99. J. G. van Gelder, ‘Een Rembrandt van 1633’, O.H. 75 (1960), pp. 73 - 78.

    Google Scholar 

  100. HdG 50, Br. 491.

    Google Scholar 

  101. W. R. Valentiner, Rembrandt. Wiedergefundene Gemälde, Stuttgart-Berlin 1921 (Kl. d. K.), p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  102. K. Bauch, Studien zur Kunstgeschichte, Berlin 1967, pp. 125 - 127.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Chr. Tümpel, unpublished thesis, Hamburg 1968, cat. no. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  104. F. Lugt, ‘Rembrandt’, Actes du XVlime Congrès international d’Histoire de l’Art, Amsterdam1952, The Hague 1955, pp. 71–87, esp. 74.

    Google Scholar 

  105. G. F. Hartlaub, ‘Merian als Illustrator’, Zeitschrift des Deutschen Vereins für Kunstwissenschaft 6 (1939), pp. 29–49, 36– 37, footnote 9. H. M. Rotermund, ‘Rembrandts Bibel’, N.K.J. 8 (1957), pp. 123–150, esp. 146-147.

    Google Scholar 

  106. E. Taverne, ‘Het blijvend beeld van Rembrandts kunst’, Simiolus 3 (1968-69), pp. 180–184, esp. 182 183.

    Google Scholar 

  107. O. Benesch, Artistic and intellectual trends from Rubens to Daumier as shown in book illustration, Cambridge, Mass. 1943, pp. 21–22.

    Google Scholar 

  108. A. Houbraken, De Groote Schouburgh der Nederlandtsche Konstschilders en Schilderessen I, Amsterdam 1718, p. 260.

    Google Scholar 

  109. HdG 103.

    Google Scholar 

  110. The Works of Sir Joshua Reynolds, Knight..., ed. E. Malone, London 1809, II, p. 363.

    Google Scholar 

  111. J. Smith, A Catalogue Raisonné... VII, London 1836, no. 82.

    Google Scholar 

  112. S. A. C. Dudok van Heel, ’De Rembrandts in de verzameling “Hinloopen”Amstelodamum. Maandblad… 56 (1969), pp. 233–237.

    Google Scholar 

  113. W. Ph. Coolhaas, Het Huis ‘De Dubbele Arend’, Amsterdam 1973, pp. 29–62, esp. 56. Cf. A. Bredius, Künstler- Inventare V, The Hague 1918, p. 1613; Strauss Doc., 1653/4.

    Google Scholar 

  114. C. Bille, De Tempel der Kunst of het Kabinet van den Heer Braamcamp, Amsterdam 1961, I pp. 32, 55 note 7; II pp. 41–42, 112.

    Google Scholar 

  115. C. Vosmaer, Rembrandt. Savie et ses oeuvres, The Hague 1877, 2nd ed., p. 498 note 1.

    Google Scholar 

  116. Ph. Hendy, European and American paintings in the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum, Boston 1974, p. 202.

    Google Scholar 

  117. Kühn, p. 201.

    Google Scholar 

  118. E. Brochhagen, ‘Beobachtungen an den Passionsbildern Rembrandts in München’, Minuscula discipulorum... Hans Kaufmann zum 70. Geburtstag 1966, Berlin 1968, pp. 37–44, esp. 39–40.

    Google Scholar 

  119. E. Kai Sass, Comments on Rembrandt’s Passion paintings and Constantijn Huygens’s iconography, Copenhagen 1971 (Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab, Historisk-Filosofiske Skrifter 5, 3), esp. pp. 12–31.

    Google Scholar 

  120. E. Haverkamp Begemann, ‘[Review of] Otto Benesch, The Drawings of Rembrandt... ’, Kunstchronik 14 (1961), pp. 10–28, esp. 19, W. Sumowski, ‘Rembrandtzeichnungen’, Pantheon 22 (1964), pp. 233–248, esp. 234-236.

    Google Scholar 

  121. W. Weisbach, Rembrandt, Berlin-Leipzig 1926, pp. 130fr.

    Google Scholar 

  122. J. L. A. A. M. van Rijckevorsel, Rembrandt en de traditie, Rotterdam 1932, PP- 99 I03–

    Google Scholar 

  123. O. Benesch, Rembrandt. Werk und Forschung, Vienna 1935, p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  124. B. P. J. Broos, ‘Rembrandt borrows from Altdorfer’, Simiolus 4 (1970), pp. 100–108, esp. 100.

    Google Scholar 

  125. I. Q. van Regieren Altena, ‘Een vroeg meesterwerk van Jacob Backer’, O.H. 42 (1925), pp. 141–147–

    Google Scholar 

  126. K. Bauch, Jacob Adriaensz Backer, Berlin 1926, p. 20, cat. no. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  127. B. Bakker, ‘De Kruisoprichting in Amstelkring’, De Kroniek van de Vriendenkring van het Rembrandthuis 20 (1966), pp. 83 90.

    Google Scholar 

  128. I. Bergström, ‘Rembrandt’s double-portrait of himself and Saskia at the Dresden Gallery’, N.K.J. 17 (1966), pp. 143 169, esp. 164 166. Cf. G. Lengl, ‘Beiträge zu den Bildern Rembrandts in der Alten Pinakothek in München’, Das Münster 20 (1967), pp. 52–58, esp. 52; H. von Einem, ‘Bemerkungen zum Christusbild Rembrandts’, Das Münster 25 (1972), PP- 349 360, esp. 349.

    Google Scholar 

  129. T. Rousseau, Jr (with technical notes by M. Pease), ‘Report on an early Rembrandt’, The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin 6 (1947), pp. 49-53-

    Google Scholar 

  130. Br.-Gerson 467.

    Google Scholar 

  131. HdG 566.

    Google Scholar 

  132. Musée National du Louvre, Catalogue des Peintures III, Paris 1922, p. 25 no. 2552; J. Foucart, Les peintures de Rembrandt au Louvre, Paris 1982, p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  133. HdG 567; Br. 19; Bauch 1966, 305; Gerson 142.

    Google Scholar 

  134. HdG 567.

    Google Scholar 

  135. Catalogue sommaire ilustré des peintures du Musée du Louvre. I. Écoles flamande et hollandaise, Paris 1979, pp. m, 192; J. Foucart, Les peintures de Rembrandt au Louvre, Paris 1982, pp. 28-31.

    Google Scholar 

  136. Bauch, Eckstein, Meier-Siem, p. 491.

    Google Scholar 

  137. Kühn, p. 197.

    Google Scholar 

  138. HdG52.

    Google Scholar 

  139. Gerson 152, Br.-Gerson 178.

    Google Scholar 

  140. C. G. Campbell, Studies in the formal sources of Rembrandt’s figure compositions, typescript dissertation, University of London 1971, pp. 187–188.

    Google Scholar 

  141. Katalog der älteren Pinakothek, Munich 1936, pp. XIX–XXVII.

    Google Scholar 

  142. Gerson 136, Br.-Gerson 183.

    Google Scholar 

  143. HdG 369.

    Google Scholar 

  144. C. Hofstede de Groot, ‘Hollandsche kunst in Schotland II: Broom Hall bij Edinburgh’, O.H. 11 (1893), p. 223.

    Google Scholar 

  145. W. Bode, ‘Die Bildnisse der Saskia van Uylenborch als Braut und junge Gattin Rembrandts’, Jahrb. d. Pr. Kunsts. 18 (1897), pp. 82–91, esp. 86. W. Bode and C. Hofstede de Groot, Rembrandt III, Paris 1899, no. 152.

    Google Scholar 

  146. W. R. Valentiner, Rembrandt. Des Meisters Gemälde, Stuttgart-Leipzig 1909 (Kl. d. K.), p. 128.

    Google Scholar 

  147. Br. 94.

    Google Scholar 

  148. H. Kühn, ‘Untersuchungen zu den Pigmenten und den Malgründen Rembrandts durchgeführt an den Gemälden der Staatlichen Kunstsammlungen Dresden’, Maltechnik\Restauro 83 (1977), pp. 223–233, esp. 229.

    Google Scholar 

  149. HdG 608.

    Google Scholar 

  150. L. Miinz, ‘The original shape of Rembrandt’s “Shipbuilder and his Wife”’, Burl. Mag. 89 (1947), pp. 253–254.

    Google Scholar 

  151. C. White, The Dutch pictures in the collection of Her Majesty the Queen, Cambridge etc. 1982, no. 160.

    Google Scholar 

  152. C. J. de Bruyn Kops, ‘De Amsterdamse verzamelaar Jan Gildemeester Jansz.’, Bulletin van het Rijksmuseum 13 (1965), pp. 79–114, esp. 111–112.

    Google Scholar 

  153. D. R. Smith, ‘Rembrandt’s early double portraits and the Dutch conversation piece’, Art Bull. 64 (1982), pp. 259–288, esp. 269–281.

    Google Scholar 

  154. I. H. van E(eghen), ‘Een brief aan Jan Heykens’, Amstelodamum. Maandblad… 56 (1969), pp. 196 198; ibidem, p. 243.

    Google Scholar 

  155. I. H. van E(eghen), ‘Jan Rijcksen en Griet Jans’, Amstelodamum. Maandblad… 57 (1970), pp. 121 127.

    Google Scholar 

  156. A. Bredius, ‘Rembrandtiana’, O.H. 26 (1908), pp. 219 224, esp. 224; Van Eeghen op. cit. (5); Strauss Doc., 1659/10.

    Google Scholar 

  157. J. Q. van Regteren Altena, in: Jan Veth, Rembrandts leven en kunst, 2nd edn, Amsterdam 1941, p. 73.

    Google Scholar 

  158. W. Bode and C. Hofstede de Groot, Rembrandt VIII, Paris 1905, no. 562.

    Google Scholar 

  159. B. Tidemanjzn., ‘Portretten van Johannes Wtenbogaert’, O.H. 21 (1903), pp. 125–128.

    Google Scholar 

  160. S. A. C. Dudok van Heel, ‘Mr. Johannes Wtenbogaert (1608–1680) een man uit Remonstrants milieu en Rembrandt van Rijn’, Jaarboek... Amstelodamum 70 (1978), Liber Amicorum I.H. van Eeghen, pp. 146-169, esp. 151; idem, ‘Abraham Anthonisz Recht (1588–1664), een Remonstrants opdrachtgever van Rembrandt’, Amstelodamum. Maandblad… 65 (1978), pp. 81–88.

    Google Scholar 

  161. H. Kühn, ‘Untersuchungen zu den Pigmenten und Malgründen Rembrandts durchgeführt an den Gemälden der Staatlichen Kunstsammlungen Kassel’, MaltechnikjRestauro 82 (1976), pp. 25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  162. HdG 630.

    Google Scholar 

  163. Gerson 123; Br.-Gerson 335.

    Google Scholar 

  164. Gf. Br. 335.

    Google Scholar 

  165. H. Kühn, ‘Untersuchungen zu den Pigmenten und Malgründen Rembrandts, durchgeführt an den Gemälden der Staatlichen Kunstsammlungen Kassel’, Maltechnik j Restauro 82 (1976), pp. 25–33, esP- 30.

    Google Scholar 

  166. C. Neumann, Rembrandt I, Munich 1922 (3rd ed), p. 197.

    Google Scholar 

  167. HdG 607.

    Google Scholar 

  168. K. Roberts, [Book-review], Burl. Mag. 121 (1979), pp. 124 126, esp. 125.

    Google Scholar 

  169. J. Meder, ‘Eine Vorzeichnung Rembrandts zu dem Cassler Porträt Saskias’, Mitteilungen der Gesellschaft für vervielfältigende Kunst. Beilage der ‘Graphischen Künste’ 1902, pp. 49–50; C. Hofstede de Groot, Die Handzeichnungen Rembrandts, Haarlem 1906, no. 1431.

    Google Scholar 

  170. Bauch 489.

    Google Scholar 

  171. W. Bode, ‘Die Bildnisse der Saskia van Uylenborch als Braut und Junge Gattin Rembrandts’, Jahrb. d. Pr. Kunsts. 18 (1897), pp. 82–91, esp. 84–85.

    Google Scholar 

  172. K. Clark, Rembrandt and the Italian Renaissance, London 1966, p. 72.

    Google Scholar 

  173. M. Louttit, ‘The romantic dress of Saskia van Ulenborch: its pastoral and theatrical associations’, Burl. Mag. 115 (1973), pp. 317 326, esp. 322.

    Google Scholar 

  174. J. O. Kronig, ‘Nog eene ontlening van Rembrandt’, O.H. 32 (1914), p. 264.

    Google Scholar 

  175. C. Vosmaer, Rembrandt Harmens van Rijn. Sa vie et ses oeuvres, Den Haag 1868, pp. 51 en 432; ed. 1877, p. 499.

    Google Scholar 

  176. Sumowski Drawings IV, no. 947.

    Google Scholar 

  177. Bauch 1933, p. 212; idem, ‘Rembrandts “Christus am Kreuz”’, Pantheon 20 (1962), pp. 137–144, esp. 138-140.

    Google Scholar 

  178. Gerson 63; Br.-Gerson 544.

    Google Scholar 

  179. Kühn, p. 201.

    Google Scholar 

  180. Bauch 1966, p. 53.

    Google Scholar 

  181. Haak 1969, p. 88.

    Google Scholar 

  182. O. Benesch, Rembrandt. Werk und Forschung, Vienna 1935, pp. 6, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  183. Münz II, p. 93.

    Google Scholar 

  184. J. L. A. A. M. van Rijckevorsel, Rembrandt en de traditie, Rotterdam 1932, pp. 87–91. J. Rosenberg, Rembrandt I, Cambridge 1948, p. 121.

    Google Scholar 

  185. J. Bruyn, ‘Rembrandt and the Italian Baroque’, Simiolus 4 (1970), pp. 28-48, esp. 35-38.

    Google Scholar 

  186. W. Sumowski, ‘Einige frühe Entlehnungen Rembrandts’, O.H. 71 (1956), pp. 109-113, esp. 110–111.

    Google Scholar 

  187. W. Wegner, Kurfürst Carl Theodor von der Pfalz als Kunstsammler, Mannheim 1960, p. 37; Alte Pinakothek München, Katalog III. Holländische Malerei des 17. Jahrhunderts, Munich 1967, pp. 56–57.

    Google Scholar 

  188. N. MacLaren, The Dutch School ( National Gallery Catalogues ), London 1960, pp. 326–328.

    Google Scholar 

  189. E. Haverkamp-Begemann, ‘Purpose and style in oil sketches of Rubens, Jan Brueghel, Rembrandt’, in: Stil und Überlieferung in der Kunst des Abendlandes III, Berlin 1967, pp. 104–113.

    Google Scholar 

  190. J. L. A. A. M. van Rijckevorsel, Rembrandt en de traditie, Rotterdam 1932, pp. 106–107.

    Google Scholar 

  191. K. Clark, Rembrandt and the Italian Renaissance, London 1966, p. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  192. K. Yegorova in: Rembrandt Harmensz van Rijn. Paintings from Soviet Museums, Leningrad [c. 1971], no. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  193. W. Weisbach, Rembrandt, Berlin-Leipzig 1926, pp. 140 - 142.

    Google Scholar 

  194. O. Benesch, ‘“Caravaggism” in the drawings of Rembrandt’, Actes du XVHe Congres international d’Histoire de I’Art, Amsterdam, 23–31 juillet 1972, The Hague 1955, pp. 385–404, esp. 394; reprinted in: O. Benesch, Collected Writings I, Rembrandt, London 1970, pp. 175–189, esp. 181. J. Bolten ed., Rembrandt and the Incredulity of Thomas. Papers on a rediscovered painting from the seventeenth century, Leiden 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  195. W. R. Valentiner, Rembrandt. Wiedergefundene Gemalde, 2nd edn, Berlin-

    Google Scholar 

  196. Leipzig 1923 (Kl. d. K.), p- 35

    Google Scholar 

  197. Sumowski 1957/58, p. 231.

    Google Scholar 

  198. Bauch 157.

    Google Scholar 

  199. Br.-Gerson 470.

    Google Scholar 

  200. Gerson 61; Br.-Gerson 472.

    Google Scholar 

  201. E. Panofsky, Problems in Titian, mostly iconographic, London-New York 19 PP- 159.

    Google Scholar 

  202. Haak 1969, pp. 122–123.

    Google Scholar 

  203. A. W. Vliegenthart, ‘Einige Bemerkungen zu Rembrandts Aktaon und Kallisto’, N.K.J. 23 (1972), pp. 85–94.

    Google Scholar 

  204. E. Michel, Rembrandt, Paris 1893, pp. 221–223.

    Google Scholar 

  205. Rembrandt Harmensz van Rijn. Paintings from Soviet Museums, Leningrad [c. 1971], no. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  206. W. Weisbach, Rembrandt, Berlin-Leipzig 1926, p. 284.

    Google Scholar 

  207. H. Voss, ‘Rembrandt und Tizian’, Repertorium für Kunstwissenschaft 28 (1905) PP- 156–162, esp. 158.

    Google Scholar 

  208. J. S. Held, ‘Flora, Goddess and Courtesan’, De artibus opuscula XL. Essays in honour of Erwin Panofsky, New York 1961, pp. 201 208.

    Google Scholar 

  209. E. Kieser, ‘Ueber Rembrandts Verhältnis zur Antike’, Zeitschr. f. Kunstgesch. 10 (1941/42), pp. 129-162, esp. 155 note 8; cf. R. Wishnevsky, Studien zum ‘portrait historié’ in den Niederlanden, diss. Munich 1967, p. 107.

    Google Scholar 

  210. N. MacLaren The Dutch School ( National Gallery Catalogues ), London 1960, pp. 332–336.

    Google Scholar 

  211. M. Louttit, ‘The romantic dress of Saskia van Ulenborch: its pastoral and theatrical associations’, Burl. Mag. 115 (1973), pp. 317 326.

    Google Scholar 

  212. A. McNeil Kettering, ‘Rembrandt’s Flute player, a unique treatment of pastoral’, Simiolus 9 (1977), pp. 19–44, esP- 24-

    Google Scholar 

  213. W. Bode with collaboration of C. Hofstede de Groot, Rembrandt III, Paris 1899, pp. 18–19, nos. 186-189.

    Google Scholar 

  214. Gerson 69; Br.-Gerson 468.

    Google Scholar 

  215. J. R. Buendía, ‘Consideraciones en torno a la exposición commemorativa de Rembrandt’, Goya. Revista de arte 95 (March-April 1970), pp. 276-283, esp. 279.

    Google Scholar 

  216. Museo del Prado — Catálogo de los cuadros, Madrid 1952, p. 511, no. 2132.

    Google Scholar 

  217. HdG 223.

    Google Scholar 

  218. H. van de Waal, ‘Rembrandt’s Faust etching, a Socinian document, and the iconography of the inspired scholar’, O.H. 74 (1964), pp. 7–48, esp. 37; reprinted in: idem, Steps towards Rembrandt, Amsterdam-London 1974, pp. 133181, esp. 143.

    Google Scholar 

  219. Bauch 1966, 162.

    Google Scholar 

  220. S. J. Gudlaugsson, ‘Bredero’s Lucelle door eenige zeventiende eeuwsche meesters uitgebeeld’, N.K.J. 1 (1947), pp. 177–195, esp. 182 and fig. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  221. J. R. Buendia, ‘Consideraciones en torno a la exposición commemorativa de Rembrandt’, Goya. Revista de arte 95 (1970), pp. 276–283, esp. 279–280.

    Google Scholar 

  222. HdG 526.

    Google Scholar 

  223. Report ‘Ueber die Malgründe… ’, 1953, typescript in the museum at Kassel.

    Google Scholar 

  224. Cf. J. Bauch and D. Eckstein, ‘Woodbiological investigations on panels of Rembrandt paintings’, Wood science and technology 15 (1981), pp. 251–263, esp. 255.

    Google Scholar 

  225. H. Kühn, ‘Untersuchungen zu den Malgründen Rembrandts’, Jahrbuch der Staatliche Kunstsammlungen in Baden-Württemberg 2 (1965), pp. 189 ff, esp. 193; idem, ‘Untersuchungen zu den Pigmenten und Malgründen Rembrandts, durchgeführt an den Gemälden der Staatlichen Kunstsammlungen Kassel’, Maltechnik/Restauro 82 (1976), pp. 25–33, esp. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  226. Br.-Gerson 22.

    Google Scholar 

  227. W. Sumowski, ‘Kritische Bemerkungen zur neuesten Gemäldekritik’ in: Neue Beiträge zur Rembrandt-Forschung, Berlin 1973, pp. 104–5, fig. 59

    Google Scholar 

  228. De Navorscher 10 (i860), p. 290, 14 (1864), pp. 78, 147, 176.

    Google Scholar 

  229. C. Hofstede de Groot, ‘Varia omirent Rembrandt III, Elison of Alenson?’, O.H. 19 (1901), pp. 91–94.

    Google Scholar 

  230. H. F. Wijnman, ‘Rembrandts portretten van Joannes Elison en zijn vrouw Maria Bockenolle naar Amerika verkocht’, Amstelodamum. Maandblad …44 (1957), pp. 65–72, esp. 71.

    Google Scholar 

  231. H. F. Wijnman, ‘Een drietal portretten van Rembrandt (Joannes Elison, Maria Bockenolle en Catrina Hoogsaet)’, Jaarboek … Amstelodamum 31 (1934) ? PP- 81–96, esp. 85–88.

    Google Scholar 

  232. H. Walpole, Anecdotes of Painting in England …II, Ed. Wornum, London 1862, p. 428 note 2.

    Google Scholar 

  233. HdG 645.

    Google Scholar 

  234. I. H. van Efeghen, ‘Marten Soolmans en Oopjen Coppit’, Amstelodamum. Maandblad … 43 (1956), pp. 85 90.

    Google Scholar 

  235. J. Smith, A catalogue raisonné of the works of the most eminent Dutch, Flemish, and French painters VII, London 1836, p. 123 no. 340.

    Google Scholar 

  236. HdG 637.

    Google Scholar 

  237. HdG 739.

    Google Scholar 

  238. Bauch 374.

    Google Scholar 

  239. Gerson 168; Br.-Gerson 194.

    Google Scholar 

  240. N. MacLaren, The Dutch School ( National Gallery Catalogues ), London 1960, pp. 322–324.

    Google Scholar 

  241. HdG 856.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Stichting Foundation Rembrandt Research Project

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bruyn, J., Haak, B., Levie, S.H., van Thiel, P.J.J., van de Wetering, E. (1986). Paintings by Rembrandt. In: A Corpus of Rembrandt Paintings. Stichting Foundation Rembrandt Research Project Foundation, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4410-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4410-7_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8462-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-4410-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics