Abstract
Since Bredius published his critical catalogue in 1935, almost every fresh definition of Rembrandt’s painted oeuvre has brought a further reduction in the number of paintings attributed to him. This has meant a corresponding increase in the number of works that while displaying Rembrandtesque features must be assumed to have been done by other hands. The number of later imitations or forgeries included among this category (which has grown again through our research) is in all probability only small. Technically and materially such paintings mostly do not differ significantly from what one finds in works accepted as authentic Rembrandt’s1. Assuming that the rejections (about many of which there has in fact been general agreement for quite some time) are warranted, one is led to conclude that these paintings were as a rule produced in Rembrandt’s circle.
While prepairing this chapter I received valuable advice and assistance from various people to all of whom I want to express my gratitude. I am especially indebted to Greet van Brigitte Blauwhofff, who worked temporarily at the Central Research Laboratory, Amsterdam, 20 B.V. Leverland and S.A.C. Dudok van Heel of the Leiden and Amsterdam Municipal Archives respectively, and to Jacques Vis., who unearthed much useful information, I have thank Karin van Nes, of the Central Research Laboratory, Amsterdam, for the care she spent on my text.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
I.I. Orlers, Beschrijving der Staadt Leyden, 2nd edn Leiden 1641, p. 375; cf. Strauss Doc., 1641/9.
S. van Hoogstraten, Inleyding tot de Schoole der Schilderkonst, Rotterdam 1678, pp. II, 95 and 181; cf. HdG Urk., no. 337.
W. Martin, De Hollandsche schilderkunst in de zeventiende eeuw I, Amsterdam 1935, p. 16.
Hostede de Groot, ‘Rembrandts onderwijs aan zijn leerlingen’, Feestbundel Dr. A. Bredius… Amsterdem 1915, pp. 79–94, esp. 80.
J. Six, ‘La famosa Accademia di Eulenborg’, Faarboek der Koninkliijke Akademie van Wetenschappen 1925/26, Amsterdam 1926, pp. 229–241.
F. Baldinucci, Notizie de’ professori del disegno… IV, Florence 1728, p. 511.
W. Martin, ‘Rembrandt-Rätsel’, Der Kunstwanderer, 1921–22, pp. 30–34, esp. 30 (where it is suggested that Br. 188 is by Jouderville) and 34.
See also: E. v.d. Wetering, ‘Isaac Jouderville, a pupil of Rembrandt’, in: exh. cat. The impact of a genius, Rembrandt, his pupils and followers in the seventeenth century, Amsterdam (K. & V. Waterman) 1983, pp. 59–69, esp. 66.
See for instance a Kitchen interior, coll. E.W., New York; cat. Exhib. Rembrandt and his pupils, Montreal/Toronto 1969, no. 76 (with illustrations).
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1986 Stichting Foundation Rembrandt Research Project
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bruyn, J., Haak, B., Levie, S.H., van Thiel, P.J.J., van de Wetering, E. (1986). Problems of apprenticeship and studio collaboration. In: A Corpus of Rembrandt Paintings. Stichting Foundation Rembrandt Research Project Foundation, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4410-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4410-7_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8462-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-4410-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive