Advertisement

An Alternative and Critical Perspective for Clinical Supervision in Schools

Chapter
Part of the Evaluation in Education and Human Services book series (EEHS, volume 13)

Abstract

To understand the 30-year history of clinical supervision (Goldhammer, 1969; Cogan, 1973) as a form of classroom-based face-to-face dialogue between teachers, we need to consider such questions as: How did it come about? How does it differ from other forms of supervision? What does it stand for? How has it become misconstrued through redefinition? What are the essential aspects of clinical supervision theory and practice for today?

Keywords

Critical Theory Critical Perspective Clinical Supervision Educational Leadership Teacher Autonomy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, R. Improving your supervision skills. National Elementary Principal, 1979, 58(4), 42–5.Google Scholar
  2. Apple, M. Scientific interests and the nature of educational institutions. In Pinar, W. (Ed.), Curriculum theorizing (pp. 120–130). Berkeley CA: McCutchan, 1975.Google Scholar
  3. Baker, R. Whither bureaucracy. Occasional paper series, University of New South Wales, 1977.Google Scholar
  4. Berlak, A. & Berlak, H. Dilemmas of schooling: Teaching and social change. London: Methuen, 1981.Google Scholar
  5. Blumberg, A. Where we came from: Notes on supervision in the 1840’s. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, 1984.Google Scholar
  6. Buros, O. Fifty years in testing: Some reminiscences, criticisms and suggestions. Educational Researcher, 1977, 6(7), 9–15.Google Scholar
  7. Cogan, M. Toward a definition of profession. Harvard Educational Review, 1953, 23(1).Google Scholar
  8. Cogan, M. Clinical supervision. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1973.Google Scholar
  9. Collingwood, R. The idea of history. New York: Oxford University Press, 1956.Google Scholar
  10. Comstock, D. A method for critical research. In Bredo, E. & Feinberg, W. (Eds.), Knowledge and values in social and educational research. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  11. Cooper, T. & Meyenn, R. A school-based project and educational change. A paper presented to the annual meeting of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Perth, 1984.Google Scholar
  12. Cubberley, E. Public school administration. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1922.Google Scholar
  13. Doyle, W. Interpreting teacher effectiveness research. Viewpoints in Teaching and Learning, 1978, 54(4), 141–153.Google Scholar
  14. Erickson, E. Verstehen and the method of disciplined subjectivity: The nature of clinical evidence. In Krimmerman, L. (Ed.), The nature and scope of social science: A critical anthology (pp. 721–735). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1969.Google Scholar
  15. Fay, B. How people change themselves: The relationship between critical theory and its audience. In Ball, T. (Ed.), Political theory and praxis: New perspectives (pp. 200–269). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  16. Forester, J. Critical theory and planning practice. American Planning Association Journal, 1980, July.Google Scholar
  17. Freedman, S., Jackson, J. & Boles, K. Teaching: An imperilled “profession.” In Shulman, L. & Sykes, G. (Eds.), Handbook of teaching and policy. New York: Longmans, 1983.Google Scholar
  18. Fried, R. Empowerment vs. delivery of services. Concord, NH: New Hampshire Department of Education, 1980.Google Scholar
  19. Garman, N. The clinical approach to supervision. In Sergiovanni, T. (Ed.), Supervision of teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1982.Google Scholar
  20. Garman, N. Clinical supervision: Quackery or remedy for professional development. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, New York, 1984.Google Scholar
  21. Goldhammer, R. Clinical supervision: Special methods for the supervision of teachers. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1969.Google Scholar
  22. Goldhammer, R., Anderson, R. & Krajewski, R. Clinical supervision: Special methods for the supervision of teachers (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1980.Google Scholar
  23. Goldsberry, L. Reality-really? A response to McFaul and Cooper. Educational Leadership, 1984, 41(7), 10–12.Google Scholar
  24. Guditus, C. The pre-observation conference: Is it worth the effort? Wingspan, the pedamorphosis communique, 1982, 1(1).Google Scholar
  25. Habermas, J. Communication and the evolution of society. Boston: Beacon Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  26. Held, D. An introduction to critical theory. London: Hutchinson, 1980.Google Scholar
  27. Hunter, M. Six types of supervisory conferences. Educational Leadership, 1980, 37(5), 408–412.Google Scholar
  28. Joncich, G. The sane positivist: A biography of Edward L. Thorndike. Middletown, Ct: Wesleyan University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
  29. Karier, C. Supervision in historic perspective. In Segiovanni, T. (Ed.), Supervision of teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1982.Google Scholar
  30. Kilbourn, B. Linda: A case study of clinical supervision. Canadian Journal of Education, 1982, 7(3), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McCarthy, T. The critical theory of Jurgen Habermas. MA: M.I.T. Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  32. McFaul, S. & Cooper, J. Peer clinical supervision: Theory vs. reality. Educational Leadership, 1984, 41(7), 4–9.Google Scholar
  33. Mosher, R. & Purpel, D. Supervision: The reluctant profession. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1972.Google Scholar
  34. Murray, M. Modern critical theory: A phenomenological introduction. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1975.Google Scholar
  35. Piccone, P. Phenomenological Marxism. In Grahl, B. & Piccone, P. (Eds.), Towards a new Marxism. St. Louis, MO: Telos Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  36. Sergiovanni, T. Toward a theory of clinical supervision. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 1976, 9(2), 20–29.Google Scholar
  37. Sergiovanni, T. Landscapes, mindscopes and reflective practice in supervision. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, 1984.Google Scholar
  38. Sergiovanni, T. & Starratt, J. Supervision: Human perspectives (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill, 1979.Google Scholar
  39. Shapiro, S. Choosing our educational legacy: Disempowerment or emancipation. Issues in Education, 1984, 2(1), 11–22.Google Scholar
  40. Smyth, J. Teachers as collaborative learners in clinical supervision: A state-of-the-art review. Journal of Education for Teaching, 1984a, 10(1), 24–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Smyth, J. Toward a “critical consciousness” in the instructional supervision of experienced teachers. Curriculum Inquiry, 1984b, 14(4), 425–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Smyth, J. Developing a critical practice of clinical supervision. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1985, 17(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Taylor, F. The principles of scientific management. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1911.Google Scholar
  44. Tyack, D. The one best system: A history of American urban education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  45. Van Manen, M. Linking ways of knowing with ways of being practical. Curriculum Inquiry, 1977, 6(3), 205–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Withall, J. & Wood, F. Taking the threat our of classroom observation and feedback. Journal of Teacher Education, 1979, 30(1), 55–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zeichner, K. & Teitelbaum, K. Personalized and inquiry-oriented teacher education: An analysis of two approaches to the development of curriculum for field-based experiences. Journal of Education for Teaching, 1982, 8(2), 95–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer · Nijhoff Publishing, Boston 1986

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations