Abstract
Information on toxic substances is expensive if not altogether inexistent. In this paper we identify some properties of the QSAR Information System and show how they can be administratively useful to the regulatory agencies involved in implementing the Canadian Environmental Contaminants Act. This is done by analyzing how the system’s properties relieve the pressures exerted by three limiting factors in the Act: 1) costs and delays, 2) the criterion of acceptable risk, and 3) the administrative hearing. The Act imposes a heavy burden of proof on the agencies and it is unlikely that QSAR outputs would be acceptable as direct evidence of a chemical’s toxicity. However, the QSAR Information System can be used as a screening tool for the identification of those high-risk chemicals for which agencies may gather more costly direct evidence.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Asher, S.C., Lloyd, K.M., Mackay, D., Paterson, S. and Roberts, J.R. 1985. Acritical examination of environmental modelling. Modelling the environmental fate of chlorobenzenes using the persistence and fugacity models. Report of the NRCC’s Associate Committee on Scientific Criteria for Environmental Quality. National Research Council of Canada, Report No. 23990, 289 p., in press.
Conkling, T.W. 1985. On-line information systems for the environmental sciences. J. Environ. Sci. 70–73.
Crowley, M. 1985. La force probante de l’information scientifique: le cas de la Loi sur les contaminants de l’environnement (Canada). INRS Eau, note de recherche No. 3, Sainte-Foy, Québec, Canada, 25 p.
Crowley, M., Sasseville, J.L. and Couture, P. 1986. Evaluation of the administrative utility of information generators in managing toxic substances: the case of the QSAR Information System. J. Environmental Management, submitted.
Dickson, K.L., Maki, A.W. and Cairns, J. (Eds.) 1982. Modeling the Fate of Chemicals in the Aquatic Environment. Ann Arbor Science Publ., Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Environmental Contaminants Act. 1974–1975. Statutes of Canada, Chapter 72.
Franson, R.T. and Lucas, A.R. 1978. La législation canadienne de lutte contre les contaminants. In La législation canadienne de l’exposition aux contaminants. Franson, R.T. et al., Conseil des Sciences du Canada, étude de documentation No. 39, Ottawa, pp. 7–97.
Gazette Officielle du Canada, Partie II. 1984 Index codifié des textes réglementaires, 1er janvier 1955 au 30 septembre 1984. Ottawa.
Hallett, D.J. 1984. The need and requirements for quantitative structure-activity relations (QSAR) in the Great Lakes Water Quality Program. In QSAR in Environmental Toxicology, Kaiser, K.L.E. (Ed.), D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, Holland, pp. 153–166.
Hunter, L., Faulkner, L., Kaiserski, T. and Antonsen, D. 1984. User manual for the QSAR system (draft). Center for Data Systems and analysis, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana.
Hushon, J.M., Klein, A.W., Strachan, W.J.M. and Schmidt-Bleek, F. 1983. Use of OECD premarket data in environmental exposure analysis for new chemicals. Chemosphere 12(6): 887–910.
Kier, LB and Hall, L.H. 1976. Molecular Connectivity in Chemistryand Drug Research. Academic Press, New York, 257 p.
Leape, J.P. 1980. Quantitative risk assessment in regulation of environmental carcinogens. Harvard Environmental Law Review 5: 86–116.
Lyman, W.J., Reehl, W.F. and Rosenblatt, D.H. (Eds.) 1982. Handbook of Chemical Property Estimation Methods. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Maugh, T.H. 1978. Chemical carcinogens: the scientific basis for regulation. Science 201: 1200–1205.
National Research Council of Canada. 1981. A screen for the relative persistence of lipophilic organic chemicals in aquatic ecosystems. An analysis of the role of simple computer models in screening. Report of the NRCC’s Associate Committee on Scientific Criteria for Environmental Quality, Ottawa, Report No. 18570, 300 p.
Office of Science and Technology Policy. 1984. Chemical carcinogens: review of the science and its associated principles. Federal Register 49(100): 21594–21661.
Schrecker, T.F. 1984. L’élaboration des politiques en matière d’environnement. Commission de réforme du droit du Canada, Document d’étude, Ottawa, 124 p.
Sive, D. 1974. Scientists in the courtroom. In Scientists in the Legal System, Thomas, W.A. (Ed.), Ann Arbor Science Publ., Ann Arbor, Michigan, pp. 103–108.
Swann, R.L. and Eschenroeder, A. (Eds.) 1983. Fate of Chemicals in the Environment. American Chemical Society Symposium Series No. 225, Washington, D.C., 320 p.
Veith, G.D. 1981. State-of-the-art report on structure activity methods development. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, Report No. EPA-600/3–81–029, 114 p.
Veith, G.D. 1984. Demonstration and information seminaron the QSAR Information System. EPA Large Lakes Research Station, Grosse Ile, Michigan, November 28.
Veith, G.D., DeFoe, D.L. and Knuth, M. 1984. Structure-activity relationshipsforscreening organic chemicals for potential ecotoxicity effects. Drug Metabolism Reviews 15(7): 1295–1303.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1987 D. Reidel Publishing Company
About this paper
Cite this paper
Crowley, M., Sasseville, JL., Couture, P. (1987). Assessing the Administrative Utility of the Qsar Information System . In: Kaiser, K.L.E. (eds) QSAR in Environmental Toxicology - II. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3937-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3937-0_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8246-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3937-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive