Abstract
In Italy as elsewhere amid the turbulence following World War I, the reception of Einstein’s theories of relativity took on distinctive political colorings in certain settings. This paper analyzes two such episodes. The first focuses on the language used in scientists’ writings, for audiences wider than the community of practitioners; about what had earlier been termed a “revolutionary” theory in the context of the new climate of revolution in postwar society and politics. Stalking the metaphors they used, such as revolution and evolution, destruction and construction, facilitates understanding of the variety of impacts of relativity within the scientific community, especially on scientists’ views of the relation of theory to experiment and the nature of scientific growth and change. Scientists’ publicly expressed opinions of scientific development were transformed by the postwar political situation from an easy acceptance of revolutionary change in science to a rejection of it and an adherence to an evolutionary, progressive view. Furthermore, this new gradualist view stimulated the doing of science: the mathematical physicist Tullio Levi-Civita wrote what became an influential paper in all Latin countries, entitled, “How a conservative could reach the threshold of the new mechanics.”
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Abraham Pais, “Subtle is the Lord …”: the science and the life of Albert Einstein (New York: Oxford University Press, 1982), 305.
Arthur I. Miller, Albert Einstein’s special theory of relativity: emergence (1905) and early interpretation (1905–1911) (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1981), 88.
Micheie La Rosa, ‘Le moderne vedute della fisica e di loro rapporti con le altre scienze,’ Calendario astronomico 1912 (Palermo: Virzi, 1912), p. 3 of offprint.
I. Bernard Cohen, Revolution in science (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1985), 14–15.
Max Abraham, ‘Die neue Mechanik,’ Scientia 15, 1914, 8–27, at 16; French translation, ibid., supplernent, 10–29, at 18.
Max Abraham, ‘Sulle onde luminose e gravitazionali,’ Nuovo cimento (6) 3, 1912, 211–219, at 219.
Carlo Somigliana, ‘I fondamenti della relatività.’ Scientia 34, 1923, 1–10, at 2.
Augusto Righi, ‘Sulle basi sperimentali della teoria della relatività’, Nuovo cimento (6) 19, 1920, 141–162, at 142.
Giorgio Valle, ‘Complementi alla teoria di Righi sull’esperienza di Michelson,’ Nuovo cimento (6) 26, 1925. 39–73.
Micheie La Rosa, ’Fundamenti sperimentali del secondo principio della teoria della relatività, Nuovo eimento (6) 3, 1912, 345–365. fascicle of May 1912.
Mussolini, ‘Dopo due anni.’ Opera omnia 16, 210–212, 23 marzo 1921, at 212.
Ardengo Soffici, ‘Relativismo e politica,’ Gerarchia 1, 1922, 29–32, at 29–30.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1987 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Reeves, B.J. (1987). Einstein Politicized: The Early Reception of Relativity in Italy. In: Glick, T.F. (eds) The Comparative Reception of Relativity. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 103. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3875-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3875-5_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8223-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3875-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive