Science, Protoscience, and Pseudoscience

  • Raimo Tuomela
Part of the Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science book series (BSPS, volume 98)


Scientific Method Scientific Realism Continental Drift Faith Healing Scientific Worldview 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abell, G. and Singer, B. (1981). Science and the Paranormal London: Junction Books.Google Scholar
  2. Alcock, J. (1981). Parapsychology: Science or Magic? Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  3. Boyd, R. (1981). “Scientific Realism and Naturalistic Epistemology”. In Asquith, P. and Giere, R. (eds.). PSA 1980, Vol. II. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association. Pp. 613–662.Google Scholar
  4. Braude, S. (1980). ESP and Psychokinesis. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bunge, M. (1983), Treatise on Basic Philosophy, Vol 6. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
  6. Eysenck, H. and Sargent, C. (1982). Explaining the Unexplained. Willemstad: Multimedia Publications.Google Scholar
  7. Frazier, K. (ed.) (1981). Paranormal Borderlands of Science. Buffalo: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  8. Gardner, M. (1982). Science: Good, Bad, Bogus. Buffalo: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  9. Grattan-Guinness, I. (ed.) (1982). Psychical Research. Wellingborough: the Aquarian Press.Google Scholar
  10. Greenwell, J. (1980). “Academia and the Occult”. The Skeptical Inquirer 5, 39–45.Google Scholar
  11. Hansel, C. (1980). ESP and Parapsychology. Buffalo: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  12. Hyman, R. (1982). “Does the Ganzfeld Experiment Answer the Critics’ Objections”. In Program and Presented Papers, Vol. I of the Centenary Jubilee Conference of the British Society for Psychical Research.Google Scholar
  13. Johnson, M. (1980). Parapsykologi. Uddevalla: Zindermans.Google Scholar
  14. Laudan, L. (1973). “Peirce and the Trivialization of the Self-Correcting Thesis”. In Giere, R. and Westfall, R. (eds.). Foundations of Scientific Method: The 19th Century. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Pp. 275–306.Google Scholar
  15. Marks, D. and Kammann, R. (1980). The Psychology of the Psychic. Buffalo: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  16. Radner and Radner (1982). Science and Unreason. Belmont: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  17. Randi, J. (1982). Flim-Flam. Buffalo: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  18. Rescher, N. (1977). Methodological Pragmatism. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Rescher, N. (1978). Peirce’s Philosophy of Science. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  20. Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Sellars, W. (1963). Science, Perception, and Reality. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  22. Tuomela, R. (1984). A Theory of Social Action. Synthese Library. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tuomela, R. (1985). Science, Action, and Reality. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
  24. Wolman, B. (ed.) (1977). Handbook of Parapsychology. New York: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raimo Tuomela

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations