Abstract
In recent writings and lectures, Chomsky has emphasized a shift in focus occurring in linguistic theory during the 1970s and’80s. While earlier models, such as that set forth in Chomsky (1965), directed their attention at positing and characterizing rule systems, in recent years, linguistic theory has focused more on conditions on representation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baker, C. L.: 1979, ‘Syntactic theory and the projection problem,’ Linguistic Inquiry 10,533–582.
Bloom, L.: 1970, Language Development, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Brown, R.: 1971, ‘Derivational complexity and order of acquisition in child speed’, in R. Brown, Psycholinguistics, Free Press, New York.
Chomsky, N.: 1965, Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Chomsky, N.: 1980, ‘On Binding’, Linguistic Inquiry 11, 1–46.
Chomsky, N.: 1981, Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris Publications, Dordrecht.
Deutsch, W. and J. Koster: 1982, ‘Children’s interpretation of sentence-internal anaphora’, P.R.C.L.D. 21, 39–45.
Freidin, R.: to appear, ‘Fundamental issues in the theory of binding’, in B. Lust (ed.), Acquisition Studies in Anaphora: Defining the Constraints, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Harbert, W.: 1981, ‘Should binding refer to SUBJECT?’, paper presented at the meeting of the North Eastern Linguistic Society, MIT.
Harbert, W.: to appear, ‘Markedness and the bindability of subject of NP’, in E. Moravcsik, J. Wirth and F. Eckman (eds.), Proceedings of Conference on Markedness, Plenum.
Huang, C.-T. J.: 1982, Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar, unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT.
Jacubowicz, C: 1983, ‘On markedness and binding principles’, paper presented at Conference on Government and Binding, Cornell University.
Matthei, E.: 1981, ‘Children’s interepretations of sentences containing reciprocals, in S. Tavakolian (ed.), Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
McNeill, D.: 1970, The Acquisition of Language, Harper & Row, New York.
Menyuk, P.: 1969, Sentences Children Use, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Newmeyer, F.: 1980, Linguistic Theory in America, Academic Press, New York.
Otsu, Y.: 1981, Universal Grammar and Syntactic Development in Children: Toward a Theory of Syntactic Development, unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT.
Picallo, C: 1984, ‘The Infl node and the null subject parameter’, Linguistic Inquiry 15, 75–102.
Solan, L.: 1983, Pronominal Reference: Child Language and the Theory of Grammar, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Solan, L.: to appear, ‘Language acquisition data and the theory of markedness: Evidence from Spanish’, in E. Moravcsik, J. Wirth and F. Eckman (eds.), Markedness, Plenum.
Solan and Ortiz: 1982, ‘The development of pronouns and reflexives: Evidence from Spanish’, paper presented at the Boston University Language Development Conference.
Williams, E.: 1981, ‘Language acquisition, markedness, and phrase structure’, in S. Tavakolian (ed.), Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory, MIT Press. Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1987 D. Reidel Publishing Company
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Solan, L. (1987). Parameter Setting and the Development of Pronouns and Reflexives. In: Roeper, T., Williams, E. (eds) Parameter Setting. Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3727-7_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3727-7_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-277-2316-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3727-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive