Abstract
The parameterized model of Core Grammar that has been recently proposed by Chomsky (1981) has a two-fold function. As a part of the framework of linguistic theory, the model accounts for some systematic differences between languages, and accounts for a wide variety of constructions within an individual language. As part of the framework of Acquisition Theory, it can account for developmental stages in the acquisition process of a first language, including both stages of a single language and cross-linguistic comparisons (Otsu, 1981; Phinney, 1983). However, only a few researchers (White, 1983, 1985; Flynn, 1983, among them) have applied this model to the problem of second language acquisition.
I would like to thank several colleagues who provided helpful discussion and comments: Francisco Betancourt, Suzanne Flynn, Yukio Otsu, and Lydia White. All errors and lapses in logic are my own responsibility.
I would also like to thank Harlan Sturm an Marie Sheppard of the Spanish department at the University of Massachusetts for allowing me access to their student materials.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abraham, R. G.: 1984, ‘Patterns in use of the present tense third person singular -s by university level ESL speakers’, Tesol Quarterly 18(1), 55–70.
Bailey, N., C. Madden, and S. D. Krashen: 1973, ‘Is there a “Natural Sequence” in adult second language learning?’, Language Learning 24(2), 235–43.
Celce-Murcia, M.: 1972, ‘The universalist hypothesis: Some implications for contrastive syntax and language teaching’, Workpapers in TESL, UCLA 6 (June), 11–16.
Chastain, K.: 1981, ‘Native speaker evaluation of student composition errors’, Modern Language Journal 65(3), 288–94.
Chomsky, N.: 1972, Language and Mind, Harcourt Brace, New York.
Chomsky, N.: 1981, Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris Publications, Dordrecht.
Chomsky, N. and M. Halle: 1968, The Sound Pattern of English, Harper and Row, New York.
Corder, S. P.: 1967, ‘The significance of learner’s errors’, IRAL 5(4), 161–170.
Eckman, F. R.: 1977, ‘Markedness and the contrastive analysis hypothesis’, Language Learning 27(2), 315–330.
Flynn, S.: 1983, ‘Similarities and differences between first and second language acquisition: Setting the parameters of universal grammar’, in D. R. Rogers and J. A. Sloboda (eds.), Acquisition of Symbolic Skills, Plenum, New York.
Guntermann, G.: 1978, ‘A study of the frequency and communicative effects of errors in Spanish’, Modern Language Journal 62(5–6), 249–53.
Hyams, N. S.: 1983, The Acquisition of Parameterized Grammars, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, CUNY.
James, C: 1971, ‘The exculpation of contrastive linguistics’, in G. Nickel (ed.), Papers in Contrastive Analysis, Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
Lado, R.: 1957, Linguistics Across Cultures, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
Moore, F. B. and R. J. Marzano: 1979, ‘Common errors of Spanish speakers learning English’, Research in the Teaching of English 13 (2), 161–67
Otsu, Y.: 1981, Universal Grammar and Syntactic Development in Children: Toward a Theory of Syntactic Development, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Phinney, M.: 1981, Syntactic Constraints and the Acquisition of Embedded Sentential Complements. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Phinney, M.: 1983, ‘Subjectless sentences in the acquisition of English and Spanish’, Presented at NELS 14, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Picallo, M. Carne: 1984, ‘The Infi node and null subject parameter’, Linguistic Inquiry 15(1), 75–102.
Ritchie, W. C: 1967, ‘Some implications of generative grammar for the construction of courses in English as a second language’, Language Learning 17, 45–69.
Rizzi, L.: 1982, ‘WH movement, negation, and the pro-drop parameter’, in Issues in Italian Syntax, Foris Publications, Dordrecht.
Rutherford, W. E.: 1982, ‘Markedness is second language acquisition’, Language Learning 32(1), 85–108.
Selinker, L.: 1972, ‘Interlanguage’, IRAL 10(2), 209–31.
Smith, K. L.: 1982, ‘Avoidance, overuse, and misuse: Three trial and error learning strategies of second language learners’, Hispania 65(4), 605–09.
Stockwell, R. P., J. D. Bowen, and J. W. Martin: 1965, The Grammatical Structures of English and Spanish, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Suñer, M.: 1982, ‘On null subjects’, Linguistic Analysis 9(1), 55–78.
Torrego, E.: 1984, ‘On inversion in Spanish and some of its effects’, Linguistic Inquiry 15(1), 103–29.
Van Naerssen, M.: 1980, ‘How similar are Spanish as a first language and Spanish as a second language?’, in S. D. Krashen and R. C. Scarcella (eds.), Research in Second Language Acquisition, Newbury House, Rowley, MA.
White, L.: 1981, ‘The responsibility of grammatical theory to acquisition data’, in N. Hornstein and D. Lightfoot (eds.), Explanation in Linguistics, Longman, London.
White, L.: 1983a, ‘Markedness and parameter setting: Some implications for a theory of adult second language acquisition’, McGill Working Papers in Linguistics 1(1), 1–21.
White, L.: 1985, ‘The “Pro-Drop” parameter in adult second language acquisition’, Language Learning 35(1), 47–62.
Zobl, H.: 1983, ‘Markedness and the projection problem’, Language Learning 33(3), 293–313.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1987 D. Reidel Publishing Company
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Phinney, M. (1987). The Pro-Drop Parameter in Second Language Acquisition. In: Roeper, T., Williams, E. (eds) Parameter Setting. Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3727-7_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3727-7_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-277-2316-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3727-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive