Abstract
It has frequently been observed that the British two-party system of government is not only unique in Europe, but also unusually robust. A critical assessment of the solidity of the claims made on the ability of a plurality system of voting to produce responsive, yet stable and efficient government has remained something of a set piece for students of the British political system, and an important touchstone for those claiming the superiority of the system to the multi-party systems of Europe and America (Ranney, 1962; Jennings, 1960–62; Blondel, 1973; Kirkpatrick, 1975; Mezey, 1979; Giulji, 1980; D. Olson 1980; M. Olson, 1982, pp.51–2).
“In a sophisticated industrial society, multi-party politics is more ‘natural’ than a two party system because there is a Bur wider diversity of interests seeking representation than can be accommodated by two major parties ….Yet … British Constitutional norms have hardly adapted to the norms of multi-party politics … the Constitution still assumes the continued existence of a stable two-party system with single-party governments alternating in office. There is thus a serious conflict between the realities of electoral life and the presuppositions of the Constitution.”(1983, p.43, 196)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alt, J.B., B. Sarlvick and I. Crewe (1974). “Partisanship and policy choice”, British Journal of Political Science, 6, 273–290.
Alt, J.B., I. Crewe and B. Sarlvick (1977). “Angels in plastic: the liberal surge in 1974”, Political Studies, 25, 343–368.
Alt, J.E. (1979). The Politics of Economic Decline. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Axelrod, R. (1970). Conflict of Interest. Chicago: Markham.
Bachrach, P. (1969). The Theory of Democratic Elitism. London, University of London Press.
Bagehot, W. (1963). The English Constitution. London: Fontana (First published 1863 ).
Beattie, A. J. (1974). “The two party legend”, Political Quarterly, 65, 288–299. Undents
Beer, S. (1956). “Pressure groups and parties in Britain”, American Political Science Review, 50, 1–23.
Beer, S. (1969). Modern British Politics. London: Faber and Faber.
Beer, S. (1982). Britain Against Itself. London: Faber
Benjamin, R. (1980). The Limits of Politics: Collective goods and political change in post-industrial societies. London and Chicago: The Chicago University Press.
Bentley, A. (1949). The Process of Government. Evanston, 111: Principa Press.
Birch, A. H. (1971). Representation. London; Pall Mall.
Blondel, J. (1973). Comparative Legislatures. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Bogdanor, V. (1983). Multi-Party Politics and the Constitution. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
Booth, A. (1982). “Corporatism, capitalism and depression in twentieth-century Britain”, British Journal of Sociology, 33, 200–223.
Brittan.S. (1976). “The economic contradictions of democracy”, British Journal of Political Science, 5, 129–159.
Burke, E. (1908). “Speech to the Electors of Bristol, 1774”, in Speeches and Letters. London: Dent.
Butler, D., and M. Pinto-Duschinsky (1980). “The Conservative Elite: 1918–78: does unrepresentativeness matter”, in Layton-Henry (ed.), Conservative Party Politics. London: MacMillan.
Carpenter, L.P. (1976). “Corporatism in Britain: 1930-45”, Journal of Contemporary History, 11, 3–25.
Craig, F.W.S. (1975). Minor Parties at British Parliamentary Elections 1885–1974. London: MacMillan.
Crewe, I. (1976). “Party identification theory and political change in Britain” in I, Budge, I. Crewe, and D. Fairlie (eds.). Party Identification and Beyond. New York: John Wiley.
Crewe, I., B. Sarlvik, and J. Alt (1977). “Partisan dealignment in Britain 1964–1974”, British Journal of Political Science, 7, 2, 129–190.
Crewe, I. (1982). “Is Britain’s two party system really about to crumble”, Electoral Studies, 1, 3, December.
Dalton, R., Flanagan, S., and Beck, P. (eds.). (1984). Electoral Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Department of the Environment, Scottish Office and Welsh Office (1985). Report of the Widdicombe Inquiry into Local Authority Ethics. London: HMSO.
Denver, D.T. (1983). “The SDP-Alliance; the end of the two-party system”, West European Politics, 6, 4, 75–102.
Dodd, L. C. (1976). Coalitions in Parliamentary Government. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Drucker, K.M. (1979). “Two-party politics in the United Kingdom”, Parliamentary Affairs, 32, 1, 19–36.
Dunleavy, P., and Ward, H. (1981). “Exogenous voter preferences and parties with State Power: some internal problems of economic theories of party competition”, British Journal of Political Science, 11, 351–380.
Epstein, L.D. (1980). “What happened to the British Party Model?”, American Political Science Review, 74, 9–22.
Eulau, H. and Wahlke, J.C. (eds.) (1978). The Politics of Representation. Beverley Hills, London: Sage Publications.
Evans, B.J and Taylor, A.J., (1984). “The rise and fall of two-party electoral co-operation”, Political Studies, 32, 2, 257–272.
Feldman, S., and Zuckerman, A.S., (1982). “Partisan attitudes and the vote: moving beyond party identification”, Comparative Political Studies, 15, 2, 197–222.
Finer, S.E. (1980). The Changing British Party System 1945-79. Washington (D.C): American Enterprise Institute.
Flanagan, S.O., and Dalton, RJ. (1984). “Parties under stress: realignment and dealignment in advanced industrial societies”, Western European Politics, 7, 947 - 23.
Gallup Poll (1976). “Voting Behaviour in Britain, 1945–1974”, in R. Rose (ed.), Studies in British Politics. London: MacMillan.
Gallup Poll (1983). The Gallup Poll, undertaken for the BBC. Published in The Guardian, June 13th, 1983.
Giulji, S. (1980). Le Statut de l’Opposition en Europe. Paris: Documentation Française, Notes et Etudes Documentaires.
Gladish, K. R. (1972). “Two-party versus multi-party in the Netherlands and Britain”, Acta Politica, 111, 3, 342–361.
Glasgow University Media Group (1976). Bad News. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Glasgow University Media Group (1980). More Bad News. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Gutmann, A. (1980). Liberal Equality. Cambridge University Press.
Guttsman, W. L. (1965). The British Political Elite. London: MacGibbon and Kee.
Hailsham, Lord (1976). Elective Dictatorship. London: BBC.
Hamer, D.A (1977). The Politics of Electoral Pressure: a study of Victorian reform agitations. London: Harvester Press.
Hibbs, D. (1977). “Political parties and macroeconomic policy”, American Pohtical Science Review, 71, 467–487.
Hibbs, D. (1982). “On the demand for economic outcomes: macroeconomic performance and mass political support in the United States, Great Britain and Germany”, Journal of Politics, 44, 2, 426–462.
Hudson, J. (1985). “The relationship between Government popularity and approval to the Government’s record in the United Kingdom”, British Journal of Political Science, 15, 165–186.
Inglehart, R. (1976). “Values, objective needs and subjective satisfaction among Western Publics”, Comparative Political Studies, 9, 429–458.
Jennings, I. (1960–1962). Party Politics, 3 Volumes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kavanagh, D. (1981). “The politics of Manifestos”, Parliamentary Affairs, 34, 7–27.
King, A. (1975). “Overload: problems of government in the 1970”, Political Studies, 23, 290–295.
King, A. (1982). “Whatever is happening to the British Party System”, American Political Science, 15, 1, 1–17.
Kirkpatrick, E.M. (1975). “Toward a more responsible two-party political system: political science, policy science or pseudo science”, American Political Science Review; 65, 965–990.
Lipsey, D. (1981). “Is the North-South divide a great British myth?”, Sunday Times, September 13.
Mckenzie, R.T. (1958). “Parties, pressure groups, and the British Political Process”, The Political Quarterly, 29, 1, 5–16.
Mezey, M.L. (1979). Comparative Legislatures. Durnham. N.C, Duke University Press.
Michels, R. (1959). Political Parties, (trans. E. and. C. Paul). New York: Dover.
Middlemas, K. (1979). Politics in Industrial Societies. London: Andre Deutsch.
Miller, W.L. (1980). “What was the profit in following the crowd: the effectiveness of party strategies on immigration and devolution”, British Journal of Political Science, 10, 15–38.
Miller, W.L. (1983). “Problems of testing the power of a media consensus”, Paper presented at the Political Studies Association Conference, University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, 14-16th April.
Mori (1983) Market and Opinion Research Poll, New Statesman, June 17th.
Norton, P. (1984). The British Polity. London: Longman.
Offe, C (1981). “The attribution of public status to interest groups: observations on the West German case”, in S. D. Berger (ed.), Organising interests in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Olson, D.M. (1980). The Legislative Process: a comparative approach. New York: Harper and Row.
Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Olson, M. (1982). The Rise and Decline of Nations, New Haven: Yale University Press.
Olson, M. (1985). Plenary Session Address, World Congress of Political Science, Paris, 15–20 July.
Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Petty, William, Sir (1690). Political Arithmetick. London: Printed for Robert Clavel and Henry Mortlock. Microfilm of original, Yale University Library, Michigan: Ann Arbor.
Petty, William, Sir (1899). The Economic Writings of Sir William Petty, C. Henry Hall (ed.), 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Pitkin, H F. (1967). The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California.
Punnett, R.M. (1984). “Regional partisanship and the legitimacy of British governments, 1868–1983”, Parliamentary AiBurs, 37, 2, 141–159.
Putnam, R. D. (1976). The Comparative Study of Political Elites. Englcwood-Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Ranney, A. (1962). The Doctrine of Responsible Party Government. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Riker, W.H. (1962). The Theory of Political Coalition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Riker, W.H. (1982). Liberalism Against Populism. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
Robertson, D. (1976). A Theory of Party Competition. New York: Wiley.
Rokkan, S. (1970). Citizens, Elections, Parties. New York: Daniel McKay.
Rokkan, S., and D.W. Urwin (1983). Economy, Territory, and Identity. London: Sage.
Rose, R., and G. Peters (1979). Can Government Go Bankrupt?. London: MacMillan.
Rose, R. (1979). “Ungovernability: is there fire behind the smoke?”, Political Studies, 27,3,351–370.
Rose, R. (1984). “Still the Era of Party Government”, Parliamentary Affairs, 37, 3, 289–299.
Schofield, N (1985). “Manipulation of the international economy”. Paper presented at the World Congress of Political Science, Paris, 15–20 July.
Schumpeter, J.A. (1954). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: Allen and Unwin.
Schwartz, J.E. (1981). “Attempting to assert the Commons Power: Labour Members in the House of Commons, 1974–1979”, Comparative Politics, 14, 1, 17–29.
SCPR. (1985) British Social Attitudes: the 1985 Report, Social and Community Planning Research. London: Gower.
Studler, D.T., and S. Welch (1981). “Mass attitudes in political issues in Britain”, Comparative Political Studies, 14, 3, 327–355.
Taylor, A, (1985). “The politics of the miner’s strike”, Politics, 5, 1, 1–9.
Taylor-Gooby, P. (1983). “Moralism, self-interest and attitudes to welfare”, Policy and PoUtics, 11, 2, 145–160.
Tilly, C. (1980). “How (and to some extent why) to study British contention”, Working Paper 212, Center for Research on Social Organisation, University of Michigan.
Tilly, L.A., and Tilly, C. (eds.). (1981). Class Conflict and Collective Action. London and Beverley Hills: Sage Publications.
Thompson, E.P. (1975). Whigs and Hunters: the Origins of the Black Act. New York: Pantheon.
Truman, D.B. (1958). The Governmental Process. New York: A. Knopf.
Weale, A. (1984). “Review Article: social choice versus populism. An interpretation of Riker’s Political Theory”, British Journal of Political Science. 14, 369–85.
Willis, D. (1983). “Political control of the economy: the riddle of the loyal and the disaffected”, Paper presented at the Political Studies Association Conference, University of Newcasde-upon-Tyne, April 14-16th.
Willis, D. (1985). “Private preferences for public goods: towards a model of interaction of pressure group and electoral politics”, Scandinavian Political Studies, 9, 1, 1–25.
Wootton, C. (1975). Pressure Groups in Britain 1720–1970. Harmondsworth; Penguin.
Zentner, P. (1982). Social Democracy in Britain. London: John Martin.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1987 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Willis, D. (1987). The Stability of Party Duopoly in Multi-Party Britain. In: Holler, M.J. (eds) The Logic of Multiparty Systems. International Studies in Economics and Econometrics, vol 17. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3607-2_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3607-2_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8114-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3607-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive