Skip to main content

An Introduction into the Logic of Multiparty Systems

  • Chapter
The Logic of Multiparty Systems

Part of the book series: International Studies in Economics and Econometrics ((ISEE,volume 17))

Abstract

This paper has been written (a) to introduce the reader to the nature of multiparty systems and the specific issues of analysis implied, (b) to prepare the readership for the problems dealt with in the contributions to this collection, (c) to give an overview of the contents of the various papers, and (d) to point out the thread which knits the papers together as well as the holes in the web which have been left for future research. The thread linking the various contributions can be identified with the notions of stability and efficiency of multiparty systems. I will come back to this in the following section. Seemingly, stability and efficiency of party and political systems, the institutional framework (like voting rules) and the expectations and behaviour of the electorate and the politicians are influenced by the notion of democracy which prevails in a society. This relationship is taken into consideration in several contributions to this volume. In order to illustrate the implicit point of departure which has been made by some authors, the two basic theories of representational democracy, the competitive model and the model of classical democracy, will be recalled in Section 3 of this introductory chapter, taking into consideration the role of parties therein. In Section 4, differences in the analytical treatment and political relevance of two-party and multiparty systems will be discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Amery, L.S. (1953). Thoughts on the Constitution, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, London et al.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.J. (1963). Social Choice and Individual Values, 2nd ed. Yale University Press, New Haven and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balinski, M.L., and H.P. Young (1982). Fair Representation Meeting the Ideal of One Man One Vote. Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, S., and M.J. Holler (1986). “Randomized Decision Rules in Voting Games: A Model for Strict Proportional Power”, Quality and Quantity (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernholz, P. (1974). “Logrolling, Arrow-Paradox and Cyclical Majorities”, Public Choice, 14, 87–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernholz, P. (1974). “Logrolling, Arrow-Paradox and Decision Rules: A Generalization”, Kyklos, 27, 49–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, D. (1968). The Theory of Committees and Elections. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, J.H. (1957). “The Existence of Social Welfare Functions”, Econometrica, 25, 302–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogdanor, V. (ed.) (1983). Coalition Governments in Western Europe, London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brams, S.J., A. Schotter, and G. Schwödiauer (eds.) (1979). Applied Game Theory, Physica-Verlag, Würzburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, E. and J. Dreijmanis(eds.) (1982). Government Coalitions in Western Democracies. Longman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, D. (1968). “Models of the Working of a Two-Party Electoral System: Part II”, Public Choice, 5, 19–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duverger, M. (1964). Political Parties (Les Parties Politiques, Paris 1951 ), 3rd ed. Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duverger, M. (1972). Party Politics and Pressure Groups. Nelson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbard, A. (1973). “Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result”, Econometrica, 40, 587–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herder-Dorneich, Ph. (1959). Politisches Modell zur WirtschaAstheorie. Theorie der Bestimmungsfaktoren Finanz-wirtschaftlicher Staatstätigkeit. Goerlich, Freiburg. ( A first edition of this book has been distributed under the author’s pseudonym Fred O. Harding, Freiburg 1957 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holler, M.J. (ed.) (1982). Power, Voting, and Voting Power. Physica-Verlag, Würzburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holler, M.J. (ed.) (1984a). Coalitions and Collective Action. Physica-Verlag, Würzburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holler, M.J. (1984b), M.J. (1984b). “A Supply Side Public Good Called Election”, paper delivered at the Meeting of the European Public Choice Society, München, 2–5 May, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holler, M.J. (1985). “Strict Proportional Power in Voting Bodies”, Theory and Decision, 249–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holler, M.J. (1986). Perfect Proportional Representation: A Normative Theory of Democratic Representation (book manuscript in progress).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotelling, H. (1929). “Stability in Competition”, Economic Journal, 39, 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jupp, J. (1968). Political Parties. Routledge & Keegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laver, M. (1985). “The Relationship Between Coalition Policy and Party Policy”, European Journal of Political Economy, 1, 243–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leiserson A. (1958). Parties and Politics. Knopf, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. (ed.) (1984a). New Approaches to the Study of Cabinet Coalitions. Comparative Political Studies Special Issue, 17, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. (1984b), Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries. Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S. (1967). “Party Systems and the Representation of Social Groups”, in R.C. Macridis (ed.), Political Parties. Harper & Row, New York et al..

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R.D., and H. Raiffa (1957). Games and Decisions. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulin, H. (1983). The Strategy of Social Choice. North Holland, Amsterdam, New York, and Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J.F. (1950). “The Bargaining Problem”, Econometrics, 28, 155–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J.F. (1953). “Two-Person Cooperative Games”, Econometrica, 22, 129–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer, J. (1975). “Some Political Implications of ‘Vote Trading and the Voting Paradox: A Proof of Logical Equivalence’: A Comment”, American Political Science Review, 69, 963–966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W.H., and P.C. Ordeshook (1973). An Introduction in Positive Political Theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P.A. (1972). “The 1972 Nobel Prize of Economic Science”, Science, 178 (No. 4060), 487–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1947). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, 2nd. ed.. Harper & Brothers, New York and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selten, r. (1971). “Anwendung der Spieltheorie auf politische Wissenschaft”, in H. Maier, K. Ritter, and U. Matz, Politik und Wissenschaft. Beck, München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapley, L.S., and M. Shubik (1954). “A Method of Evaluating the Distribution of Power in a Committee System”, American Political Science Review, 48, 787–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1979). The Wealth of Nations, ed. by A. Skinner. Pelican Classics, Harmonds wbrt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahlberg, K., and V. Helander (1984). “Influence and Participation”, in D. Anckar and E. Berndtson (ed.), Essays on Democratic Theory. Finnish Political Science Association, Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. (1976). Anarchy and Cooperation. Wiley, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittman, D. (1973). “Parties as Utility Maximizers”, American Political Science Review, 67, 490–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittman, D. (1983). “Candidate Motivation: A Synthesis”, American Political Science Review, 77, 142–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Holler, M.J. (1987). An Introduction into the Logic of Multiparty Systems. In: Holler, M.J. (eds) The Logic of Multiparty Systems. International Studies in Economics and Econometrics, vol 17. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3607-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3607-2_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8114-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3607-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics