Advertisement

Aspects of the Sexual Incarnation. An Inquiry Concerning the Meaning of the Body in the Sexual Encounter

  • Jan Linschoten
Chapter
Part of the Phaenomenologica book series (PHAE, volume 103)

Abstract

“Among all experienceable things our body is the most our own,”2 but - amazingly enough - the body has been overlooked by psychology for many years. To be certain it has been spoken of: but merely as res extensa, as an apparatus or mechanism, a status it owes to Descartes. However, the body which thus was conceived of and maintained as a “preparation”, that is as a thing neither alive nor dead, has been assigned a new importance by anthropology in the past few decades, and has now begun to regain its place in psychology, too, as that with which man lives and in which he lives. The body as means of eksistence has become a central theme. In Husserl, however, it is still left out of consideration when taken in this function: phenomenology started with the rediscovery and unfolding of the Cogito and therefore continued to consider the body as merely an object of intentional acts: thus the body in its facticity. And in Heidegger, too, who shifted phenomenology’s center of gravity from transcendental consciousness to being-in-the-world, the body is not mentioned; in Being and Time fewer than 10 lines are devoted to the body.3 Interest in the body, thus, did not originate in phenomenology, but in the philosophy of life, in Maine de Biran and in Bergson. It was precisely the contact between these two currents which made the problematic of the body a fertile field for contemporary psychology. On the scene of recent French thought the crop has been harvested by Sartre and Merleau-Ponty. But this does not mean that the chapter on “Bodilihood” is complete.

Keywords

Sexual Desire Sexual Relationship Sexual Encounter Narrow Sense Sexual Organ 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. 1.
    P. Valéry, Analecta (Paris: Gallimard, 1935), p. 198.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    F.J.J. Buytendijk, Algemene theorie der menselijke houding en beweging (Antwerpen: Stan-daard Bockhandel, 1948), p. 57.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. de Waelhens, Préface to M. Merleau-Ponty, La structure du comportement (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1949), p. vi.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    V.E. von Gebsattel, “Ehe und Liebe,” in Zeitschrift für Völkerpsychologie und Soziologie, 1 (1925), p. 251.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J.-P. Sartre, Being and Nothingness, trans. Hazel E. Barnes (New York: Philosophical Library, 1956), pp. 306–366.Google Scholar
  6. 5a.
    J.H. van den Berg, “Menselijk lichaam, menselijke beweging,” in Ne-derlandsch Tijdschrift voor Psychologie, 5(1950), especially, pp. 402–412.Google Scholar
  7. 6.
    van den Berg, op. cit., p. 296.Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    Ibid., p. 405.Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    E. Michel, Ehe, eine Anthropologie der Geschlechtsgemeinschaft (Stuttgart; Klett, 1948), p. 11.Google Scholar
  10. 9.
    A. Gide, Si le grain ne meurt… (Paris: Gallimard, 1928), p. 58.Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    G. Flaubert, Madame Bovary, in Oeuvres complètes, vol. 8 (Paris: Conard, 1910), pp. 112–113.Google Scholar
  12. 11.
    van den Berg, op. cit., p. 295.Google Scholar
  13. 12.
    F. Harris, My life and loves, vol. I, (Paris: Obelisk Press, 1949), pp. 57–58.Google Scholar
  14. 13.
    M. Proust, Du côté de chez Swann, vol. I (Paris: Grasset, 1919), p. 146.Google Scholar
  15. 14.
    Stendhal, quoted by S. de Beauvoir, Le deuxième sexe, vol. I (Paris: Gallimard, 1949), p. 365.Google Scholar
  16. 15.
    A. Camus, Noces (Paris: Chariot, 1947), p. 18.Google Scholar
  17. 16.
    Ibid., p. 23.Google Scholar
  18. 17.
    Cf. my article “Over het inslapen,” in Tijdschrift voor Philosophie, 14(1952), no. 2 (Cf. this volume, pp. 79–117).Google Scholar
  19. 18.
    J.-P. Sartre, op. cit., p. 388.Google Scholar
  20. 19.
    J. Green, Le visionnaire (Paris: Pion, 1950), pp. 50–51. (Our italics.)Google Scholar
  21. 20.
    J.P. Sartre, op, cit., pp. 344–345.Google Scholar
  22. 21.
    Cf. van den Berg, Menselijk lichaam, pp. 410, 423.Google Scholar
  23. 22.
    J.P. Sartre, op. cit., p. 344.Google Scholar
  24. 23.
    H. Barbusse, L’enfer (Paris: Michel, 1949), p. 34. English translation by R. Baldick (London: Chapman and Hall, 1966), p. 25. (Our italics.)Google Scholar
  25. 24.
    P. Louys, Aphrodite (Bruxelles, 1946), p. 22. English: The Collected Works of Pierre Louys (New York: Libra, 1932), p. 17.Google Scholar
  26. 25.
    Cf. M. Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Phenomenology of Perception (New York: Humanities Press, 1962).Google Scholar
  27. 26.
    F.J.J. Buytendijk, “Zur Phänomenologie der Begegnung,” in Er ano s-Jahrbuch, 19(1951), p. 467.Google Scholar
  28. 27.
    M. Heidegger, “Vom Ursprung des Kunstwerkes,” in Holzwege (Frankfurt a.M.: Klostermann, 1950), pp. 31ff.Google Scholar
  29. 28.
    Buytendijk, Ibid., p. 465.Google Scholar
  30. 29.
    Cf. Sartre, Being and Nothingness, pp. 351–359; particularly the passage on “the look,” Ibid., pp. 252–302. See for a very brief summary of these ideas: Merleau-Ponty, Phenomenology of Perception, pp. 166–168.Google Scholar
  31. 30.
    van den Berg, Menselijk lichaam, p. 412.Google Scholar
  32. 31.
    Sartre, Being and Nothingness, p. 363.Google Scholar
  33. 32.
    E. Flaiano, The Short Cut (New York: Pellegrini and Cudahy, 1950), p. 19. (Our italics.)Google Scholar
  34. 33.
    Ch. Darwin, Het uitdrukken der gemoedsaandoeningen, trans. H. Hartogh Heys; Darwins biologische meesterwerken (Arnhem-Nijmegen; Slaterus, n.d.), p. 350.Google Scholar
  35. 34.
    Sartre, Being and Nothingness, pp. 276–277.Google Scholar
  36. 35.
    Darwin, op. cit., pp. 330, 329.Google Scholar
  37. 36.
    Buytendijk, Begegnung, pp. 480–481.Google Scholar
  38. 37.
    von Gebsattel, Ehe und Liebe, p. 250.Google Scholar
  39. 38.
    Cf. J.A. Bierens de Haan, Die tierische Instinkte und ihr Umbau durch Erfahrung (Leyden: Brill, 1940), pp. 205–212.Google Scholar
  40. 39.
    Buytendijk, Begegnung, pp. 449ff.Google Scholar
  41. 40.
    Cf. my essay “Over de humor,” in Tijdschrift voor Philosophie, 13(1951); also: F.J.J. Buy-ten dijk, Het spel van mens en dier (Amsterdam, 1932).Google Scholar
  42. 41.
    M. Proust, La prisonnière, vol. I, (Paris: Éditions de la Nouvelle Revue Française, 1923) pp. 91, 115,131.Google Scholar
  43. 42.
    M. Proust, A l’ombre des jeunes filles en fleurs, vol. I, (Paris: Éditions de la Nouvelle Revue Française, 1920), p. 88.Google Scholar
  44. 43.
    Sartre, Being and Nothingness, pp. 382, 376.Google Scholar
  45. 44.
    Cf. G. Gusdorf, La découverte de soi (Paris; Presses Universitaires de France, 1948), Part III, Chapter I.Google Scholar
  46. 45.
    Louys, Aphrodite, p. 98, (English: p. 71).Google Scholar
  47. 46.
    A. de Saint-Exupéry, Courrier sud (Paris: Gallimard, 1929), p. 145.Google Scholar
  48. 46a.
    See for the meaning of the mouth: F.J.J. Buytendijk, De vrouw (Utrecht: Het Spectrum, 1951), p. 194.Google Scholar
  49. 46a.
    Cf. also: G. Bachelard, L’eau et les rêves (Paris: Corti, 1947), pp. 135–136 concerning “warm moisture.”Google Scholar
  50. 47.
    M. Proust, Le côté de Guermantes, vol. II (Paris: Editions de la Nouvelle Revue Française, 1920–1921), p. 232.Google Scholar
  51. 48.
    Catullus, quoted by C. Nyrop, The Kiss (Chicago: Allen, 1898), p. 54.Google Scholar
  52. 49.
    B. Aafjes, In den beginner (Amsterdam: Querido, 1949), p. 31.Google Scholar
  53. 50.
    Sartre, Being and Nothingness, pp. 389–390.Google Scholar
  54. 51.
    Ibid., pp. 387, 388.Google Scholar
  55. 52.
    J. Romains, Le dieu des corps (Paris: Gallimard, 1928), p. 123.Google Scholar
  56. 53.
    Sartre, Being and Nothingness, p. 388.Google Scholar
  57. 54.
    Cf. L. Binswanger, Grundformen und Erkenntnis menschlichen Daseins (Zurich: Niehans, 1942), Part I, Chapter 2.Google Scholar
  58. 55.
    Our italics.Google Scholar
  59. 56.
    Sartre, Ibid., p. 389.Google Scholar
  60. 57.
    P. Caminade, Les amies des hommes, p. 28. Cf. H. Kunz, Die Aggressivität und die Zartlichkeit (Bern: Francke, 1946), p. 82.Google Scholar
  61. 58.
    Buytendijk, Begegnung, p. 481.Google Scholar
  62. 59.
    M. Proust, La prisonnière, vol. II, p. 230.Google Scholar
  63. 60.
    P. Géraldy, Toi et moi (Milano: Editoriale italiana, 1952), pp. 81–82.Google Scholar
  64. 61.
    Buytendijk, Algemene theorie, p. 25.Google Scholar
  65. 62.
    Ibid., p. 134. (Our italics.)Google Scholar
  66. 63.
    P. Federn, “Beiträge zur Analyse des Sadismus und Masochismus,” in Internationale Zeitschrift für ärtzliche Psychoanalyse, 1(1913), pp. 38ff.Google Scholar
  67. 64.
    Sartre, Le mur (Paris: Gallimard, 1939), p. 97.Google Scholar
  68. 65.
    J. Romains, Le dieu des corps, p. 136.Google Scholar
  69. 66.
    Cf. J. Rosenbaum, Geschichte der Lustseuche im Altertum (Berlin: Krayn, 1904)Google Scholar
  70. 66a.
    also: H. Flournoy, “Çiva Androgyne,” in Archives de Psychologie, 18(1923).Google Scholar
  71. 67.
    Buytendijk, De vrouw, p. 291.Google Scholar
  72. 69.
    Buytendijk, De vrouw, p. 290.Google Scholar
  73. 70.
    Cf. Kunz, op. cit., p. 77.Google Scholar
  74. 71.
    G. Blin, “Le sadisme de Baudelaire,” in La profondeur et le rhythme (Paris: Gallimard, 1948), p. 252.Google Scholar
  75. 71a.
    Cf. D.A.M. Marquis de Sade, Justine, ou Les malheurs de la vertu (Paris: Pauvert, 1950), p. 191.Google Scholar
  76. 72.
    Sartre, La nausée (Paris: Gallimard, 1938), pp. 18–19. Cf. the scene in Le mur, pp. 74–75.Google Scholar
  77. 73.
    I. Bloch, Das Sexualleben unserer Zeit (Berlin; Marcus, 1919), p. 45.Google Scholar
  78. 74.
    F.J.J. Buytendijk, Über den Schmerz (Bern: Huber, 1948), pp. 20–21.Google Scholar
  79. 75.
    G. Bachelard, La psychanalyse du feu (Paris: Corti, 1949), p. 218.Google Scholar
  80. 76.
    S. de Beauvoir, Le deuxième sexe, vol. II (Paris: Gallimard, 1949), p. 156.Google Scholar
  81. 77.
    Buytcndijk, De vrouw, p. 113.Google Scholar
  82. 78.
    Ibid., p. 195.Google Scholar
  83. 79.
    C.A. Scott, “Sex and Art,” in American Journal of Psychology, 7(1896), p. 206.Google Scholar
  84. 80.
    Louys, Aphrodite, p. 97. (English: p. 70).Google Scholar
  85. 81.
    A. Hesnard, Traité de sexologie (Paris: Payot, 1933), p. 283.Google Scholar
  86. 82.
    Ibid., p. 284.Google Scholar
  87. 83.
    Louys, op. cit., p. 26, (English: p. 19.)Google Scholar
  88. 84.
    A. T’Serstevcns, Le vagabond sentimental (Paris: Michel, 1923), p, 135. (Our italics.) English: The Sentimental Vagabond, trans. W. Chambers, (New York: Parrar and Rinehart, 1930), pp. 152–153.Google Scholar
  89. 85.
    J. Lyrand, Aurette et Jacques (Paris: Corti, 1947), pp. 225–226.Google Scholar
  90. 86.
    Buytendijk, De vrouw, p. 188.Google Scholar
  91. 87.
    Ibid., pp. 201,217,218.Google Scholar
  92. 88.
    M. Proust, Du côté de chez Swann, vol. I, p. 145. (Our italics.)Google Scholar
  93. 89.
    M. Merleau-Ponty, Phenomenology of Perception, pp. 230–232.Google Scholar
  94. 90.
    G. Marcel, Du refus à l’invocation (Paris: Gallimard, 1940), p. 123.Google Scholar
  95. 91.
    Cf. Binswanger, op. cit.Google Scholar
  96. 92.
    Cf. F.J.J. Buytendijk, De psychologie van de roman (Utrecht: Het Spectrum, 1951).Google Scholar
  97. 93.
    Louys, Aphrodite, p. 82. (English: pp. 58–59).Google Scholar
  98. 94.
    Flaiano, The Short Cut, p. 30. Cf. De vrouw, pp. 232ff.Google Scholar
  99. 95.
    Cf. M. Proust, La prisonnière, vol. I, pp. 84–85.Google Scholar
  100. 96.
    Buytendijk, De vrouw, p. 232.Google Scholar
  101. 97.
    Buytendijk, De vrouw, p. 229. Cf. the entire chapter on “mysterious interiorjty.”Google Scholar
  102. 98.
    Buytendijk, De vrouw, p. 334.Google Scholar
  103. 99.
    Géraldy, Toi et moi, p. 58.Google Scholar
  104. 100.
    J.H. van den Berg, “Het gesprek,” in Persoon en wereld (Utrecht: Bijleveld, 1963), pp. 136–154.Google Scholar
  105. 101.
    Cf. F.J.J. Buytendijk and H. Plessner, “Die Deutung des mimischen Ausdrucks,” in Philosophischer Anzeiger, 1925–1926, p. 90.Google Scholar
  106. 102.
    Merleau-Ponty, Phenomenology of Perception, pp. 165–166.Google Scholar
  107. 103.
    Cf. B.J. Kouwer and J. Linschoten, Inleiding tot de psychologie (Assen: Van Gorcum, 1951), Chapter 5.Google Scholar
  108. 104.
    van den Berg, Menselijk lichaam, p. 406. Buytendijk, Het spel, p. 81.Google Scholar
  109. 105.
    Aafjes, op. cit., pp. 27–28.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan Linschoten

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations