Advertisement

Husserl’s Original View on Phenomenological Psychology

  • Joseph J. Kockelmans
Chapter
Part of the Phaenomenologica book series (PHAE, volume 103)

Abstract

Some forty years ago Edmund Husserl spoke publicly for the first time of a new phenomenological psychology. He saw this new psychology as a discipline that was destined to play an important role in the already established empirical psychology as well as in philosophy. Subsequently under the influence of his ideas an extensive phenomenological psychological movement began to spread through various European countries. When a careful analysis of this phenomenological movement is made, one becomes aware of a number of clearly distinguishable currents and schools, all of which claim Husserl as their origin. The truth is, however, that only a very few psychologists actually use Husserl’s concepts without making major modifications. Furthermore, many psychologists talk about phenomenology without stipulating precisely what is meant by the term. To compound the difficulties there is noticeable in phenomenological literature a frequent failure to make a clear distinction between Husserl’s thought and that of other phenomenologists such as Scheler, Heidegger, Jaspers, Merleau-Ponty, Sartre and Binswanger.

Keywords

Natural Attitude Transcendental Phenomenology Pure Consciousness Transcendental Philosophy Empirical Psychology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Edmund Husserl, Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. Eine Einleitung in die phänomenologische Philosophie, herausgegeben von Walter Biemel (Husserliana, Band IV) (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1954). English translation by David Can: The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1970). For the foregoing remarks see: Stephan Strasser, Phenomenology and the Human Sciences: A Contribution to a New Scientific Ideal (Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 1963), pp. 245–248.Google Scholar
  2. 2a.
    Hermann Drüe, Edmund Husserls System der phänomenologischen Psychologie (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1963);Google Scholar
  3. 2b.
    Joseph J. Kockelmans, Edmund Husserl’s Phenomenological Psychology: A Historico-critical Study (Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 1967);Google Scholar
  4. 2c.
    Aron Gurwitsch, Studies in Phenomenology and Psychology (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1966).Google Scholar
  5. 3.
    Edmund Husserl, Philosophie der Arithmetik. Psychologische und logische Untersuchungen, Erster Band (Halle a.S.: Pfeiffer, 1891).Google Scholar
  6. 4.
    Logische Untersuchungen, 2 vols. (Halle a.S.: Niemeyer, 1900–1901). English translation of the second edition by J.N. Findlay: Logical Investigations, 2 vols. (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1970).Google Scholar
  7. 5.
    Edmund Husserl, Die Idee der Phänomenologie. Fünf Vorlesungen (1907), herausgegeben von Walter Biemel (Husserliana, Band II) (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1950). English translation by William P. Alston and George Nakhnikian: The Idea of Phenomenology (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1950).Google Scholar
  8. 6.
    Edmund Husserl, Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Erstes Buch: Allgemeine Einführung in die reine Phänomenologie, herausgegeben von Walter Biemel (Husserliana, Band III) (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1950). English translation by F. Kersten: Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1982).Google Scholar
  9. 7.
    Edmund Husserl, “Philosophie als strenge Wissenschaft,” in Logos, 1 (1910–1911), pp. 289–341. English translation by Quentin Lauer, Edmund Husserl: Phenomenology and the Crisis of Philosophy (New York: Harper & Row, 1965), pp. 69–147. See also: Cross Currents, 6(1956), pp. 228–246 and pp. 324–44.Google Scholar
  10. 8.
    Edmund Husserl, Phänomenologische Psychologie (1925), herausgegeben von Walter Biemel (Husserliana, Band IX) (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1962). English translation by John Scanlon: Phenomenological Psychology, Summer Semester, 1925 (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1977).Google Scholar
  11. 9.
    Edmund Husserl, Phänomenologische PsychologieThe Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1962 Ibid., pp. 46–51.Google Scholar
  12. 10.
    “Phenomenology,” in Encyclopaedia Britannica, 14th ed. (London, 1927), vol. 17, cls. 699 702.Google Scholar
  13. 11.
    “Amsterdamer Vorträge,” in Phänomenologische Psychologie, pp. 302–349.Google Scholar
  14. 12.
    Edmund Husserl, Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge, herausgegeben von Stephan Strasser (Husserliana, Band I) (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1950). English translation by Dorion Cairns: Cartesian Meditations. An Introduction to Phenomenology (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1960).Google Scholar
  15. 13.
    Edmund Husserl, Krisis, pp. 238–269.Google Scholar
  16. 14.
    Joseph J. Kockelmans, Edmund Husserl’s Phenomenological Psychology, Chapter VI and the literature quoted there.Google Scholar
  17. 15.
    Edmund Husserl, Phänomenologische Psychologie, pp. 4–13. See also: Herbert Spiegelberg, The Phenomenological Movement: A Historical Introduction, 2 vols. (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1960), Vol. I, pp. 150–151.Google Scholar
  18. 16.
    Edmund Husserl, Philosophie als strenge Wissenschaft, pp. 299–322 (90–110).Google Scholar
  19. 17.
    Ibid., pp. 302–323(92–94).Google Scholar
  20. 18.
    Ibid., pp. 303–305(95–96).Google Scholar
  21. 19.
    Ibid., pp. 305–309(96–98).Google Scholar
  22. 20.
    Ibid., pp. 309–312(98–102).Google Scholar
  23. 21.
    Ibid., pp. 312–314(102–103).Google Scholar
  24. 22.
    Ibid., pp. 314–322(103–110).Google Scholar
  25. 23.
    Edmund Husserl, “Amsterdamer Vorträge,” in Phänomenologische Psychologie, pp. 302–349.Google Scholar
  26. 24.
    Ibid., pp. 302–303.Google Scholar
  27. 25.
    Ibid., p. 303.Google Scholar
  28. 26.
    Ibid., pp. 303–304.Google Scholar
  29. 27.
    Ibid., pp. 304–305.Google Scholar
  30. 28.
    Ibid., p. 305.Google Scholar
  31. 29.
    Ibid., p. 305.Google Scholar
  32. 30.
    Ibid., pp. 307–308.Google Scholar
  33. 31.
    Ibid., pp. 308–309.Google Scholar
  34. 32.
    Ibid., p. 309.Google Scholar
  35. 33.
    Ibid., pp. 309–310.Google Scholar
  36. 34.
    Ibid., pp. 310–311.Google Scholar
  37. 35.
    Ibid., pp. 311–312.Google Scholar
  38. 36.
    Ibid., p. 312.Google Scholar
  39. 37.
    Ibid., p. 312.Google Scholar
  40. 38.
    Ibid., pp. 312–314.Google Scholar
  41. 39.
    Ibid., pp. 314–315.Google Scholar
  42. 40.
    Ibid., p. 316.Google Scholar
  43. 41.
    Ibid., p. 316.Google Scholar
  44. 42.
    Ibid., pp. 315–321.Google Scholar
  45. 43.
    . Ibid., pp. 321–324.Google Scholar
  46. 44.
    . Ibid., pp. 324–325.Google Scholar
  47. 45.
    . Ibid., p. 325.Google Scholar
  48. 46.
    Ibid., pp. 326–328.Google Scholar
  49. 47.
    Ibid., p. 328.Google Scholar
  50. 48.
    Edmund Husserl, Cartesianische Meditationen, pp. 48–63 (7–23).Google Scholar
  51. 49.
    Edmund Husserl, Phänomenologische Psychologie, pp. 331–342.Google Scholar
  52. 50.
    Ibid., pp. 343–344.Google Scholar
  53. 51.
    . Ibid., p. 46.Google Scholar
  54. 52.
    Ibid., p. 46–51.Google Scholar
  55. 53.
    Edmund Husserl, Krisis, pp. 238–260.Google Scholar
  56. 54.
    Ibid., pp. 261–269.Google Scholar
  57. 55.
    Joseph J. Kockelmans, Husserl’s Phenomenological Psychology, Chapter VI.Google Scholar
  58. 56a.
    Ibid., pp. 314–351; also see the literature quoted there, particularly: Stephan Strasser, Phenomenology and the Human Sciences, pp. 245–320; L. Landgrebe, Philosophie der Gegenwart (Bonn: Athenäum Verlag, 1952), Chapter 1; Der Weg der Phänomenologie (Gütersloh: Mohn, 1963);Google Scholar
  59. 56b.
    Walter Biemel, “Husserls Encyclopaedia Britannica Artikel und Heideggers Anmerkungen dazu,” in Tijdschrift voor Philosophie, 12 (1950), pp. 246–289;Google Scholar
  60. 56c.
    Paul Ricoeur, Husserl: An Analysis of his Phenomenology, trans. Edward Ballard and Lester Embree (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1967);Google Scholar
  61. 56d.
    Hans-Georg Gadamer, Wahrheit und Methode (Tübingen: Mohr, 1960); English translation: Truth and Method (New York: The Seabury Press, 1975).Google Scholar
  62. 57.
    Edmund Husserl, Ms. 37 IV 26, quoted by Drüe, op.cit., p. 242.Google Scholar
  63. 58a.
    Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, trans. John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson (London: SCM Press, 1962), pp. 49–63; History of the Concept of Time, trans. Theodore Kisiel (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1985), pp. 13–131;Google Scholar
  64. 58b.
    William J. Richardson, Heidegger: Through Phenomenology to Thought (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1963), pp. viii-xxii. Google Scholar
  65. 59a.
    Joseph J. Kockelmans, “World-Constitution: Reflections on Husserl’s Transcendental Idealism,” in A.-T. Tymieniecka, ed., Analecta Husserliana, vol. I (Dordrecht, Reidel, 1971), pp. 11–35;Google Scholar
  66. 59b.
    William J. Richardson, Heidegger: Through Phenomenology to Thought (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1963) op. cit., pp. 16–24.Google Scholar
  67. 60.
    Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, pp. 244–256.Google Scholar
  68. 61.
    Ibid., pp. 61–63; cf. Hans-Georg Gadamer, op. cit., pp. 250–289 (pp. 235–274).Google Scholar
  69. 62a.
    Cf. Heidegger’s draft of the article on phenomenology to be included in the Encyclopaedia Britannica, in Edmund Husserl, Phänomenologische Psychologie, pp. 256–263, pp. 590–603; Jean-Paul Sartre, The Emotions: Outline of a Theory, trans. Bernard Frechtman (New York: Philosophical Library, 1948), Introduction, pp. 1–21, cf. also pp. 92–4;Google Scholar
  70. 62b.
    Karl Jaspers, General Psychopathology, trans. J. Hoenig and M. Hamilton (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1964), pp. 55–154. The fact that Jaspers objects to Husserl’s Wesensschau does not alter the fact that he, too, maintains the possibility of a descriptive study of psychic phenomena.Google Scholar
  71. 63.
    Cf. Stephan Strasser, Phenomenology and the Human Sciences, passim.Google Scholar
  72. 64.
    Cf. Jean-Paul Sartre, The Emotions, pp. 1–21. 65. Ibid., pp. 93–94.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph J. Kockelmans

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations