Advertisement

Intracardiac Flow Dynamics

  • Phillip Brun
  • Albert Meguira
  • Andreas Strauss
Part of the Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine book series (DICM, volume 73)

Abstract

The principles that govern fluid motion in normal blood vessels can still be best approached by using the classic Poiseuille model. This law states that the ratio of the pressure gradient (PI - P2) to flow (Q) is a function of the tube dimensions and the viscosity (μ) of the moving fluid:
$$\frac{{P1 - P2}} {Q} = \frac{{8\mu L}} {{\pi (r^4 )}} $$
where r is the radius of the tube and L is the length of the tube. The ratio of pressure gradient (PI - P2) to flow (Q) is also defined as the vascular resistance (R).

Keywords

Cardiac Output Shear Rate Velocity Profile Aortic Valve Mitral Valve 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Caro CG. Pedley TJ, Schroter RC, Seed WA. The Mechanics of the Circulation. Oxford University Press, London, 1978Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gill, Robert W. Measurement of blood flow by ultrasound: Accuracy and sources of error. Ultrasound Med & Biol 11;4:625–41, 1985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hatle L, Angelsen BAJ. Doppler Ultrasound in Cardiology: Physical Principles and Clinical Applications (2nd ed), Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, 1985Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    McDonald DA. Blood Flow in Arteries(2nd ed). Edward Arnold, London, 1974Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Milnor WR. Hemodynamics. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore/London, 1982Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ihlen H, Amlie JP, Dale J, et al. Determination of cardiac output by Doppler echocardiography. Br Heart J 52:54–60, 1984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stewart WJ, Jiang L, Mich R, et al. Variable effects of changes in flow rate through the aortic pulmonary and mitral valves on valve area and flow velocity: Impact on quantitative Doppler flow calculations. J Am Coll Cardiol 6:3:653–62, 1985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fisher DC, Sahn DJ, Friedman MJ, et al. The mitral valve orifice method for noninvasive two-dimensional echo Doppler determinations of cardiac output. Circulation 67:872–7 1983PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang Y, Nitter-Hauge S, Ihlen H, Myhre E. Doppler echocardiographic measurement of cardiac output using the mitral orifice method. Br Heart J 53:130–6, 1985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gillam LD, Ascah KJ, Wilkins GT, et al. Which cardiac valve provides the best Doppler estimate of cardiac output in humans (abstr)? Int Symp on Doppler Echocardiography: 25, July 1986Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    De Boo, Van Mill GJ, Van der Werf T. An improved noninvasive method to assess the ratio of pulmonary to systemic flow in adults using pulsed Doppler echocardiography (abstr). Fourth Int Cong on Echocardiology: 88, April 1984Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Phillip Brun
  • Albert Meguira
  • Andreas Strauss

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations