Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Documenta Ophthalmologica Proceedings Series ((DOPS,volume 49))

  • 117 Accesses

Abstract

Peripapillary crescents of choroidal atrophy occur commonly in patients with glaucoma [6], particularly in those with low tension glaucoma [4] and may indicate the part of the optic nervehead that seems to be susceptible to glaucomatous damage [1]. It has been suggested that the absence of a peripapillary choroidal atrophy may indicate a more resistant optic nervehead in which much higher levels of intraocular pressure elevation are required to produce damage. In such resistant discs it is thought that the damage may be manifested by a generalized enlargement of the cup with diminution of the neuroretinal rim indicating diffuse as opposed to localized damage of the nerve. It has not yet been worked out whether peripapillary atrophy occurs as an acquired change together with localized damage, or whether it constitutes a congenital misalignment which makes the tissue more susceptible to the subsequent effects of intraocular pressure. Peripapillary crescents were found to be more common in patients with glaucoma than in normal controls or ocular hypertensives [7]. Some degree of peripapillary chorioretinal atrophy was even reported to be present in all cases of glaucoma [3].

Peripapillary choroidal atrophy also occurs in myopia and is known to occur with age. It has not yet been shown whether the area of peripapillary choroidal atrophy changes with aging, but changes in the peripapillary choroidal crescents in glaucoma are known to occur.

Not all peripapillary crescents are alike as there are several tissue layers which can overlap in a variety of ways. The details of these Variations may be important as they may denote various factors that make optic nerveheads susceptible. Such dfferences have not yet been clearly analyzed.

It was the purpose of this paper to correlate the size of the optic nervehead with the size of the physiological blind spot and to see whether the relationship between them breaks down with age which might indicate a change of size of the peripapillary chorioretinal atrophy with aging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson DR: Correlation of the peripapillary anatomy with the disc damage and field abnormalities in glaucoma. In: Greve EL, Heijl A (eds) Fifth Int Visual Field Symposium. Dr W Junk Publishers, Dordrecht, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Britton RJ, Drance SM, Schulzer M, Douglas GR, Mawson DK: The area of the normal neuroreti-nal rim. In preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Heijl A, Samander C: Peripapillary atrophy and glaucomatous visual field defects. In: Heijl A, and Greve EL (eds) Proceedings of the 6th Int Visual Field Symposium. Dr W Junk Publishers, Dordrecht, 1985.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Laatikainen L: Fluorescein angiographic studies of the peripapillary and perilimbal regions in simple, capsular and low-tension glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol, Supplementum 111, (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Littman H: Zur Bestimmung der wahren Grösses eines Objektes auf dem Hintergrund des lebenden Auges. Klin Mbl Augenheilkd. 180: 286–289 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Primrose J: The incidence of the peripapillary halo glaucomatosus. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 89: 585–587 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wilensky JT, Kolker AE: Peripapillary changes in glaucoma. Amer J Ophthalmol 81: 341–345 (1976).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

E. L. Greve A. Heijl

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers/Dr W. Junk, Publishers, Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Britton, R.J., Drance, S.M., Douglas, G.R., Schulzer, M. (1987). The correlation of the physiological blind spot and the disc area. In: Greve, E.L., Heijl, A. (eds) Seventh International Visual Field Symposium, Amsterdam, September 1986. Documenta Ophthalmologica Proceedings Series, vol 49. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3325-5_87

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3325-5_87

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7993-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3325-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics