Advertisement

Role of ventricular late potentials for identification of patients at risk of ventricular tachycardia

  • Günter Breithardt
  • Martin Borggrefe
  • Klaus Haerten
  • Joachim Schwarzmaier
  • Ulrich Karbenn
  • Andrea Podczeck
Part of the Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine book series (DICM, volume 71)

Abstract

Recent interest in the field of non-invasive clinical electrophysiology has focused on the use of signal averaging for detection of abnormal, low-amplitude electrical activity at the end of or after the QRS-complex on the body surface in patients with documented ventricular tachycardia [1–7]. These signals have been called ventricular late potentials (‘potential tardif’) [7]. They probably originate from areas of regional slow conduction in the border zone of old myocardial infarction. There is convincing evidence that their presence is closely correlated with the propensity to ventricular tachycardia [2–5, 9–11]. With conventional methods of ECG recording, these signals can normally not be registered on the body surface. Berbari et al. [1] in the experimental animal and Fontaine et al. [7] in man were the first to report that these signals could be recorded from the body surface by the use of high-gain amplification, appropriate filtering and computer averaging techniques.

Keywords

Myocardial Infarction Ventricular Tachycardia Pulmonary Artery Pressure Late Potential Arrhythmic Event 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Berbari EJ, Scherlag BJ, Hope RR, Lazzara R. 1978. Recording from the body surface of arrhythmogenic ventricular activity during ST segment. Am J Cardiol 41: 697–702.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Breithardt G, Becker R, Seipel L, Abendroth R-R, Ostermeyer J. 1981. Noninvasive detection of late potentials in man — a new marker for ventricular tachycardia. Eur Heart J 2:1–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hombach V, Höpp H-W, Braun V, Behrenbeck DW, Tauchert M, Hilger HH. 1980. Die Bedeutung von Nachpotentialen innerhalb des ST-Segmentes im Oberflächen-EKG bei Patienten mit koronarer Herzkrankheit. Dtsch med Wschr 195:1457–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rozanski JJ, Mortara D, Myerburg RJ, Castellanos A. 1981. Body surface detection of delayed depolarizations in patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia and left ventricular aneurysm. Circulation 63: 1172–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Simson MB. 1981. Identification of patients with ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction from signals in the terminal QRS complex. Circulation 64: 235–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Uther JB, Dennett CJ, Tan A. 1978. The detection of delayed activation signals of low amplitude in the vectorcardiogram of patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia by signal averaging. In: Sandoe E, Julian DG, Dell JW, eds. Management of ventricular tachycardia-role of mexiletine. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica: 80–2.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fontaine G, Frank R, GallaisHamonno F, Allali I, Phan-Tuc H, Grosgogeat. 1978. Electrocardiographic des potentiels tradifs du syndrome de post-excitation. Arch Mal Coeur 71: 854–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Simson MB, Untereker WJ, Spielman SR et al. 1983. Relation between late potentials on the body surface and directly recorded fragmented electrocardiograms in patients with ventricular tachycardia. Am J Cardiol 51:105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Breithardt G, Borggrefe M, Karbenn U, Abendroth R-R, Yeh HL, Seipel L. 1982. Prevalence of late potentials in patients with and without ventricular tachycardia: Correlation with angiographic findings. Am J Cardiol 49: 1932–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Breithardt G, Schwarzmaier J, Borggrefe M, Haerten K, Seipel L. 1983. Prognostic significance of ventricular late potentials after acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 4: 487–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Breithardt G, Borggrefe M, Quantius B, Karbenn U, Seipel L. 1983. Ventricular vulnerability assessed by programmed ventricular stimulation in patients with and without late potentials. Circulation 68: 275–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Höpp HW, Hombach V, Braun V, Behrenbeck DW, Tauchert M, Hilger HH. 1981. Kammerarrhythmien und ventrikuläre Spätdepolarisationen bei akutem Myokardinfarkt. Z Kardiol 70: 319 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Simson M, Spielman S, Horowitz L, Josephson M, Harken A, Kastor J. 1981. Slow ventricular activation detected on the body surface in patients with ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 47: 498 (Abstr.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Denes P, Santarelli P, Hauser RG, Uretz EF. 1983. Quantitative analysis of the high frequency components of the terminal portion of the body surface QRS in normal subjects and in patients with ventricular tachycardia. Circulation 67: 1129–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Poll DS, Marchlinski FE, Falcone RA, Simson MB. 1984. Abnormal signal averaged ECG in nonischemic congestive cardiomyopathy: Relationship to sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Circulation 70 (Suppl II): 11–253.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kertes PJ, Glabus M, Murray A, Julian DG, Campbell RWF. 1984. Delayed ventricular depolarization-correlation with ventricular activation and relevance to ventricular fibrillation in acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 5: 974–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Haberl R, Hoffmann E, Steinbeck G. 1985. Low-frequency components in patients with delayed ventricular activation. Circulation 72: Suppl III-6.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Freedman RA, Gillis AM, Kern A, Sonderholm-Difatte V, Mason JW. 1985. Signal-averaged electrocardiographic late potentials in patients with ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia: correlation with clinical arrhythmia and electrophysiologic study. Am J Cardiol 55: 1350–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 18.
    Kanovsky MS, Falcone RA, Dresden CA, Josephson ME, Simson MB. 1984. Identification of patients with ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction: Signal averaged electrocardiogram. Holter monitoring, and cardiac catheterization. Circulation 70: 264–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 19.
    Buxton AE, Simson MB, Falcone R et al. 1984. Signal averaged ECG in patients with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia: Identification of patients with potential for sustained ventricular arrhythmias. JACC 3: 495 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
  21. 20.
    Cain ME, Ambos HO, Witowski FX, Sobel BE. 1984. Fast-Fourier transform analysis of signal-averaged electrocardiograms for identification of patients prone to sustained ventricular tachycardia. Circulation 69: 711–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 21.
    Cain ME, Ambos HD, Markham J, Fisher AE, Sobel BE. 1985. Quantification of differences in frequency content of signal-averaged electrocardiograms in patients with compared to those without sustained ventricular tachycardia. Am J Cardiol 55: 1500–05.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 22.
    Denniss AR, Holley LK, Cody DV et al. 1983. Ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation: Differences in ventricular activation times and ventricular function. J Am Coll Cardiol 1: 606 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
  24. 23.
    Borggrefe M, Karbenn U, Breithardt G. 1982. Spätpotentiale und elektrophysiologische Befunde bei ventrikulären Tachykardien. Z Kardiol 71: 627 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
  25. 24.
    Edvardsson N, Hirsch I, Pettersson A-S, Olsson SB. 1984. Noninvasive recording of continuous diastolic electrical activity during ventricular tachycardia. Circulation 4: 487–95 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
  26. Simson MB, Falcone RA, Dresden CA, Josephson ME. 1984. Late potentials in anterior versus inferior myocardial infarction: J Am Coll Cardiol 3: 624 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
  27. Breithardt G, Borggrefe M, Karbenn U, Schwarzmaier J. 1986. Effects of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions on ventricular late potentials. Eur Heart J (in press).Google Scholar
  28. 27.
    Simson MB, Spielman SR, Horowitz LN et al. 1982. Effects of antiarrhythmic drugs on body surface late potentials in patients with ventricular tachycardia. Am J Cardiol 49:1030 (Abstr.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 28.
    Denniss AR, Ross DL, Cody DV, Ho B, Russell PA, Young AA. 1984. Effect of antiarrhythmic therapy on delayed potentials in patients with ventricular tachycardia (Abstr.) JACC 3: 495.Google Scholar
  30. 29.
    Höpp HW, Deutsch H, Hombach V, Braun V, Hilger HH. 1982. Medikamentöse Beeinflußbarkeit ventrikulärer Spätpotentiale. H Z Kardiol 71: 206 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
  31. 30.
    Jauerning RA, Senges J, Langfelder W et al. 1983. Effect of antiarrhythmic drugs on ventricular late potentials at sinus rhythm and at constant heart rate. In: Cardiac pacing. Eds.: Steinbach K, Glogar D, Laszkovics A, Scheiblhofer W, Weber H. Steinkopff Verlag: 767–72.Google Scholar
  32. 31.
    Cain ME, Ambos HD, Fischer AE, Markham J, Schechtmann KB. 1984. Noninvasive prediction of antiarrhythmic drug efficacy in patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia from frequency analysis of signal averaged ECGs. Circulation 70 (Suppl II): II-252.Google Scholar
  33. 32..
    Simson MB, Falcone R, Kindwall E. 1985. The signal averaged electrocardiogram does not predict antiarrhythmic drug success. Circulation 72: Suppl III-7.Google Scholar
  34. 33.
    Breithardt G, Borggrefe M, Karbenn U et al. 1982. Verhalten ventrikulärer Spätpotentiale nach operativer Therapie ventrikulärer Tachykardien. Z Kardiol 71: 381–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 34.
    Breithardt G, Seipel L, Ostermeyer J et al. 1982. Effects of antiarrhythmic surgery on late ventricular potentials recorded by precordial signal averaging in patients with ventricular tachycardia. Am Heart J 104: 996–1003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Simson MB, Spielman SR, Horowitz LN, Falcone RA, Harken AH, Josephson ME. 1981. Effects of surgery for control of ventricular tachycardia on late potentials. Circulation 64 (Suppl IV): IV-88.Google Scholar
  37. 36.
    Marcus NH, Falcone RA, Harken AL, Josephson ME, Simson MB. 1984. Body surface late potentials: effects of endocardial resection in patients with ventricular tachycardia. Circulation 70: 632–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 37.
    Oeff M, von Leitner E-R, Brüggemann T, Andresen D, Sthapit R, Schröder R. 1982 Methodische Probleme bei der Registrierung ventrikulärer Spätpotentiale. Z Kardiol 71: 204 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
  39. 38.
    Oeff M, von Leitner ER, Sthapit R et al. 1983. Methods for noninvasive detection of ventricular late potentials — a comparative multicenter study. In: Steinbach K, Glogar D, Laszkovics A, Scheiblhofer W, Weber H eds. Cardiac Pacing. Darmstadt: Steinkopff Verlag: 641–7.Google Scholar
  40. 39.
    Karbenn U, Breithardt G, Borggrefe M, Simson MB. 1985. Automatic identification of late potentials. J Electrocardiol 18: 123–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 40.
    von Leitner ER, Oeff M, Loock D, Jahns B, Schroder R. 1983. Value of noninvasively detected delayed ventricular dpolarization to predict prognosis in post myocardial infarction patients. Circulation 68 (Suppl III): III—83.Google Scholar
  42. 41.
    Breithardt G, Borggrefe M, Haerten K. 1985. Role of programmed ventricular stimulation and noninvasive recording of ventricular late potentials for the identification of patients at risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias after acute myocardial infarction. In: Zipes DP, Jalife J. Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias. Grune and Stratton: 553–61.Google Scholar
  43. 42.
    Spielman SR, Untereker WJ, Horowitz LN et al. 1981. Fragmented electrical activity - relationship to ventricular tachycardia. Am J Cardiol 47: 448 (Abstr.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 43..
    Klein H, Karp RB, Kouchoukos NT, James TN, Waldo AL. 1979. Ventricular mapping of abnormal myocardiun in patients with and without arrhythmias. Circulation (Suppl): 11–24 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
  45. 44.
    Wiener I, Mindich B, Pitchon R. 1984. Endocardial activation in patients with coronary artery disease: Effects of regional contraction abnormalities. Am Heart J 107: 1146.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 45.
    Daniel T, Boineau J, Sabiston D. 1971. Comparision of human ventricular activation with canine model in myocardial infarction. Circulation 44: 74–89.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 46.
    Gardner PI, Ursell PC, Fenoglio JJ, Wit AL. 1985. Electrophysiologic and anatomic basis for fractionated eectrograms recorded from healed myocardial infarcts. Circulation 72: 596–611.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 47.
    Ideker RE, Mirvis DM, Smith WM. 1985. Late fractionated potentials. Am J Cardiol 55:1614–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 48.
    Moss AJ. 1980. Clinical significance of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with and without artery disease. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 23: 33–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 49.
    Cats VM, Lie KI, van Capelle FJL, Durrer D. 1979. Limitations of 24 hour ambulatory elec­trocardiographic recording in predicting coronary events after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 44: 1257–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 50.
    van Durme JP, Pannier RH. 1976. Prognostic significance of ventricular dysrhythmias 1 year after myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 37: 178 (Abstr.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 51..
    Kuchar D, Thorburn C, Sammel N. 1985. Natural history and clinical significance of late potentials after myocardial infarction. Circulation 72: Suppl. III-477.Google Scholar
  53. 52.
    Denniss AR, Cody D V, Fenton SM et al. Significance of delayed activation potentials in survivors of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1983; 1: 582 (Abstr)Google Scholar
  54. 53.
    Kacet S, Libersa C, Caron J, Boudoux B, d’Haute Feuille X, Marchand J, Dagano J, Lekieffre J. The prognostic value of averaged late potentials inpatients suffering from coronary artery disease. Abstracts of the international symposium ‘Ventricular Techycardies’ May 1986.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Günter Breithardt
    • 1
  • Martin Borggrefe
    • 1
  • Klaus Haerten
    • 1
  • Joachim Schwarzmaier
    • 1
  • Ulrich Karbenn
    • 1
  • Andrea Podczeck
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Cardiology, Pneumology, and AngiologyHospital of the University of DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany,F.R.

Personalised recommendations