Skip to main content

Perception of risk

  • Chapter
  • 35 Accesses

Part of the book series: CMR Workshop Series ((CMRWS))

Abstract

The public’s perceptions of risk might be epitomized by the trick question that was popular when I was about 8 or 9 years old: which is heavier, a pound of feathers or a pound of lead? It is a question that loses its trick character after one has digested the basic idea of weights and measures, but is a distinct challenge to a mind that is in transition from ignorance to the understanding of these fundamentals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Science’85, 6(8), 1985

    Google Scholar 

  2. Louis Harris and Associates: (1980). Risk in a Complex Society - A Marsh & McLennan Public Opinion Survey. (New York: Marsh & McLennan).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Starr, C. (1972) Benefit-cost studies in socio-technical systems. In Perspectives on Benefit- Risk Decision Making. (Washington, DC: National Academy of Engineering).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kletz, T.A. (1977). The risk equations - what risks should we run? New Scient., 74, 320–2

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lord Rothschild. (1978). Risk - the Richard Dimbleby Lecture. The Listener, 30 November

    Google Scholar 

  6. Heilmann, K. and Urquhart, J. (1983). Keine Angst vor der Angst: Risiko-Element unseresLebens und Motor des Fortschritts. (Munich: Kindler Verlag)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Urquhart, J. and Heilmann, K. (1984). Risk Watch: The Odds of Life. (New York; Facts on File Publications)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ibid, p. 14

    Google Scholar 

  9. WHO Scientific Group on the Epidemiology of Aging: The Uses of Epidemiology in the Study of the Elderly. World Health Organization Technical Report Series 706, Geneva, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fries, J.F. (1980). Ageing, natural death and the compression of mortality. N. Engl. J. Med., 303, 130–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Education and Examination Committee of the Society of Actuaries (1977). Part 10 (LB), Study notes, 10 LB-507–81, (Chicago)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Anonymous (1985). Update: Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome - United States. MMWR, 34, 245

    Google Scholar 

  13. Anonymous. (1982). Death on the road. Wall St. J., 14 April

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dicke, W. (1982). States heeding pleas to strengthen laws on drunk driving. NY Times, 16 April

    Google Scholar 

  15. Reference 7, p. 89

    Google Scholar 

  16. Baker, S.P. O’Neill, B. and Karts, R.S. (1984).Injury Fact Book. Fig. 16–1. (Lexington MA: Lexington Books)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ibid, Fig. 17–21

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ibid, Fig. 18–24

    Google Scholar 

  19. Brackenridge, R.D.C. (1977). Medical Selection of Life Risks. (London; Undershaft Press)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Comfort, A. (1984). Alcohol as a social drug and health hazard. Lancet, 1, 443–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sherlock, S. (ed.). (1982). Alcohol and Disease. Br. Med. Bull., 38

    Google Scholar 

  22. US Department of Health, Education and Welfare. (1964). Smoking and Health. PHS Publ. No. 1103 (Washington DC; US Government Printing Office)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cowell, M.J. and Hirst, B.C. (1980). Mortality differences between smokers and nonsmokers. Trans. Soc. Actuaries, 32, 1–29

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hayes, T.C. (1981). Insurance gain for the nonsmoker. NY Times, 11 April

    Google Scholar 

  25. Society of Actuaries. (1959). Build and Blood Pressure Study. (Chicago)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Royal Society. (1983). Risk Assessment - Report of a Royal Society Study Group. (London)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sills, D.L. (1985). Hazards beyond number. Nature, 317, 117–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. British Standards Institution. (1979). Glossary of Terms Used in Quality Assurance (Including Reliability and Maintainability Terms). BS 4778 (London).

    Google Scholar 

  29. US Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. (1978). Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Medical Technologies. (Washington, DC)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Reference 7, pp. 47–51, 190–195

    Google Scholar 

  31. Royal College of General Practitioners, Oral Contraceptive Study. (1977). Mortality among oral contraceptive users. Lancet, 2, 727–31

    Google Scholar 

  32. Reference 7, p. 49

    Google Scholar 

  33. US Bureau of the Census. (1980).Statistical Abstract of the United States, Table 108. (Washington, DC)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hanley, J. A. and Lippman-Hand, A. (1983). If nothing goes wrong, is everything all right? J. Am. Med. Assoc., 1743–5

    Google Scholar 

  35. Inman, W.H.W. (1985). Risks in Medical Intervention. In Cooper, M.G. (ed.). Man-made Hazards to Man. (Oxford: Clarendon)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 MTP Press Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Urquhart, J. (1987). Perception of risk. In: Walker, S.R., Asscher, A.W. (eds) Medicines and Risk/Benefit Decisions. CMR Workshop Series. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3221-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3221-0_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7946-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3221-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics