Abstract
At the time drugs are licensed evidence for the efficacy and safety of a new compound will have been more or less secured. At this stage, efficacy has often only been established in a limited number of patients under a narrow range of conditions, and safety in relatively small numbers for a short duration. During the post-marketing period, evidence may accumulate to suggest that the efficacy is considerable in a wider group of patients than was originally indicated, and that safety during long-term use in a more heterogeneous population is acceptable. Alternatively, efficacy may appear to be less satisfactory than originally believed and safety becomes prejudiced. The good news is relatively easy to evaluate, and I am going to concentrate on the bad news which is much more difficult to assess. My paper will, therefore, address risk-benefit assessment when there is an apparent problem.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1987 MTP Press Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rawlins, M.D. (1987). Risk-benefit decisions in licensing changes. In: Walker, S.R., Asscher, A.W. (eds) Medicines and Risk/Benefit Decisions. CMR Workshop Series. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3221-0_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3221-0_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7946-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3221-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive