Biology of Chrysomelidae pp 317-355

Part of the Series Entomologica book series (SENT, volume 42)

Comparative morphology of the internal reproductive system of the Chrysomelidae (Coleoptera)

  • Kunio Suzuki


Commensurate with the large number of species and immense variety of structures, a considerable body of knowledge on the internal reproductive system in the Coleoptera has been amassed by many workers. I myself have published four review articles in which a great number of studies dealing with the structure of various facets of the system, such as morphology, embryology, physiology, ecology, etc., have been concisely summarised (Suzuki 1977,1978, 1983a, b).


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aggarwal. S. K. 1967. Morphological and histochemical studies on oogenesis in Callosobruchus analis Fabr. (Bruchidae-Coleoptera). J. Morph 122: 19–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Aslam. N. A. 1963. On the genera of Indo-Pakistan Cleoninae and Hylobiinae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Bull British Mus. nat. Hist. (Ent.) 13: 47–66Google Scholar
  3. Berti. N. and Rapilly. M. 1977. Remarques taxinomiques sur Aphthona alexander Berti & Rapilly. Ann. Soc. ent. Fr. 13: 69–74.Google Scholar
  4. Bhatnagar, R. D. S. and Musgrave. A. J. 1970. Aspects of histophysiology of the spermathecal gland of Sitophilus granarius (t..) (Coleoptera). Can. J. Zool 49: 275–277.Google Scholar
  5. Boiteau. G., Bradley. J. R. and Van Duyn. J. W. 1979. Bean leaf beetle: some seasonal anatomical changes and dormancy. Ann. ent. Soc. Amer. 72: 303–307.Google Scholar
  6. Bordas, L. 1900. Recherches sur les organes reproducteurs mâles des Coléoptères. Ann. Sci. nat., Zool. 11: 283–448. ph. 17–27.Google Scholar
  7. Böving, A. G. and Craighead. F. C. 1931 An illustration synopsis of the principal larval forms of the order Coleoptera. Ent. Amer. XI (new series). 351 pp., 125 pls.Google Scholar
  8. Brivio, P. C. 1958. Sull’accertata presenza in Italia di Phylhuleaa vulgatissima (L.) Suffr. e dati sulla morfologia addominale delle Phyllodecta italiane (Col. Chrysomelidae) Boll. Soc. ent. Ital. 88: 38–44.Google Scholar
  9. Brivio, C. 1977. L’apparato genitale femminile di alcune specie di Galerucella Crotch e generi vicini (Coleoptera Chrysomelidae Galerucinae). Mem. Soc. ent. Ital. 56: 244–250.Google Scholar
  10. Büning, J. 1978. Development of telotrophic-meroistic ovarioles of Polyphage beetles with special reference to the formation of nutritive cords. J. Morph. 156: 237–256, 7 pls.Google Scholar
  11. Buzzi, Z. J. 1975. Redescricao e bionomia de Anacassis cribrum (Klug, 1829) (Coleoptera-Chrysomelidae). Acta Biol. Par., Curitiba 4: 59–89, 3 pls.Google Scholar
  12. Buzzi, Z. J. 1976. Uma nova especie de Anacassis do sul do Brasil (Coleoptera-Chrysomelidae). Dusenia, Brasil 9: 107–111.Google Scholar
  13. Cerezke, H. F. 1964. The morphology and function of the reproductive systems of Dendroctonus monticolae Hopk. (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. Ent. 96: 477–500.Google Scholar
  14. Chen, S. H. 1940. An attempt at a new classification of the leaf beetles. Sinensia 11: 451–481.Google Scholar
  15. Chûjô, M. 1953. A taxonomic study on the Chrysomelidae with special reference to the fauna of Formosa (2). Technical Bull., Kagawa Agr. Coll. 5: 121–136. pls. IV–VII.Google Scholar
  16. Crowson, R A. 1955. The Natural Classification of the Families of Coleoptera. Nathaniel Lloyd & Co., Ltd., 187 pp.Google Scholar
  17. Das. N. C. 1966a. On the spermatheca of female reproductive organs of Dicladispa armigera (Ol.). Sci. & Cult. 32: 270.Google Scholar
  18. Das. N. C. 1966b. Female reproductive system of Dicladispa armigera (Ol.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Sci. & Cult. 32: 272–273.Google Scholar
  19. Daviault, L. 1928. Sur le dévelopment post-embryonaire de la Bruche du Haricot Acanthoscelides obtectus Say. Suivide considérations sur la signification phylétique de son dimorphisme larvaire. Ann. Soc. ent. Fr. 97: 105–132.Google Scholar
  20. DeLoof, A. and Lagasse, A. 1970. The ultrastructure of the follicle cells of the ovary of the Colorado beetle in relation to yolk formation. J. Ins. Physiol. 16: 211–220.Google Scholar
  21. DeLoof, A. and Lagasse, A. 1972. The ultrastructure of the male accessory reproductive glands of the Colorado beetle. Z. Zellforsch. 130: 545–552.Google Scholar
  22. Escherich. K. 1894. Anatomische Studien über das männliche Genitalsystem der Coleopteren. Z. f. wiss. Zool. 57: 620–642. Taf. XXVI.Google Scholar
  23. Fogato, W. and Leonardi, C. 1980. Coleotteri Crisomelidi della brughiera di Rovasenda (Piemonte). Quaderni sulla’Struttura delle Zoocenosi Terrestri,’1. La brughiera pedemontana II: 25–73.Google Scholar
  24. Furth. D.G. 1979a. Zoogeography and host plants of Longitarsus in Israel, with descriptions of six new species (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Israel J. Ent. 13: 79–124.Google Scholar
  25. Furth. DG . 1979b Zoogeography and host plant ecology of the Alticinae of Israel, especially Phyllotreta; with descriptions of three new species (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Israel J. Zool. 28: 1–37.Google Scholar
  26. Gerber. G. H., Neill. G. B. and Westdal, P. H. 1978. The anatomy and histology of the internal reproductive organs of the sunflower beetle. Zygogramma exclamations (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Can. J. Zool. 56: 2542–2553.Google Scholar
  27. Gerber. G. H., Neill, G. B. and Westdal, P. H. 1979. The reproductive cycle of the sunflower beetle. Zygogramma exclamationis (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), in Manitoba. Can. J. Zool. 57: 1934–1943.Google Scholar
  28. Gross. J. 1903. Untersuchungen über die Histologie des Insectovariums. Zool Jahrb. Anat. Ontog. Tiere 18: 71–186. pis. 6–14Google Scholar
  29. Gupta. A P. and Riley. R. C. 1967. Female reproductive system and histology of the asparagus beetle. Crioceris asparagi (Col.: Chrysomelidae) Ann. ent. Soc Amer. 60: 980–988.Google Scholar
  30. Hamnett.G. G. 1944. An investigation into the life-history and morphology of the mustard beetle, Phaedon cochleariae F., on watercress. Proc. zool. Soc:. London 114: 368–381, pls. I– V I.Google Scholar
  31. Happ, G. M. and Happ, C. M. 1970 Fine structure and histochemistry of the spermathecal gland in the mealworm beetle, Tenebrio molitor. Tissue & Cell 2: 443–466.Google Scholar
  32. Harnisch, W. 1915. Über den männlichen Begattungsapparat einiger Chrysomeliden. Ein Beitrag zur Phylogenie des Copulationsapparatus der Käfer. Z. wissensch. Zool. 64: 1–94.Google Scholar
  33. Hayashi, N. 1962. The larva of Zeugophora (Pedrillia) annulata (Baly). New Entomol., Uéda 11 (5): 1–3.Google Scholar
  34. Heberdey, R. F. 1931. Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte, vergleichende Anatomie und Physiologie der weiblichen Geschlechtsausführwege der Insekten. Z. Morph. Ökol. Tiere 22: 416–586.Google Scholar
  35. Hegner, R. W. 1909. The origin and early histology of germ cells in some chrysomelid beetles. J. Morph. 20: 231–297, pls. I–IV.Google Scholar
  36. Hirschler, J. 1909. Die Embryonalentwicklung von Donacia crassipes L. Z. wissensch. Zool. 92: 627–739, pls. XXXI–XXXV.Google Scholar
  37. Hori, K. 1960. Comparative anatomy of the internal organs of the Calyptrate Muscoid flies. I. Male internal sexual organs of the adult flies. Sci. Rep., Kanazawa Univ. 7: 23–83, 9 pls.Google Scholar
  38. Huignard, J. 1975. Anatomie et histologie des glandes annexes males au cours de la vie imaginale chez Acanthocelides oblectus Say (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Int. J. Insect Morphol. Embryol. 4: 77–88.Google Scholar
  39. labrokoff-Khnzorian, S. M. 1966 and 1967 Considerations sur l’édéage des Chrysomelidae et son importance phylogénique. L’Entomologist 22: 115–137: Appendice 23: 65–67.Google Scholar
  40. labrokoff-Khnzorian. S M. 1974. Remarques sur Ies genitalia femelles des Coleopteres et leur armure. Ann. Soc. ent. Fr. (n. S.) 10: 467–186.Google Scholar
  41. Jolivet, P. 1959. Recherches sur I’aile des Crysomeloidae (Coleoptera). II. Mem. Inst. Sci. nat. Belg., Brussels (2) fase 58: 1–152, pls. 21–40.Google Scholar
  42. Kaufmann, T. 1970. Studies on the biology and ecology of Pyrrhalta nymphaea (Col. Chrysomelidae) in Alaska with special reference to population dynamics Amer Mdl. Nat 83: 496–509.Google Scholar
  43. Khan, N R and Musgrave. A J. 1969. Observations on the functional anatomy of the reproductive organs ot Sitophilus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Can. J. Zool. 47: 665–669.Google Scholar
  44. Khatib, S. M. II. 1946. The internal anatomy of Galerucella birmanica Jac. Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci. 24: 35–54.Google Scholar
  45. Kumar, R. and Atiah, P. K. 1977. Structure of the organs of digestive and reproduction in the tortoise beetle. Aspidomorpha spp. (Chrysomelidae: Coleoptera). J. nat. Hist. 11: 65–76.Google Scholar
  46. Lécaillon. A. 1898. Sur Ies enveloppes ovulaires de quelques Chrysomelides. Arch d’anat. microsc. 2:89–117, pl. V.Google Scholar
  47. Leonardi, C. 1970. Materiali per uno studio filogenetico del genere Psylliodes (Coleoptera Chrysomelidae). Alti. Soc It. Sc. Nat. e Musco Civ. St. Nat Milano 110: 201–223.Google Scholar
  48. Leonardi. C. 1972a. La spermateca nella sistematica del genere Longitarsus. Atti. Soc. It. Sc. Nat. e Musco Civ. St. Nat. Milano 113: 5–27.Google Scholar
  49. Leonardi, C. 1972b. La ‘Psylliodes wachsmanni’ Csiki specie distincta e suo inquadramento nel gruppo della ‘Psylliodes picina’ (Coleoptera Chrysomelidae). Atti. Mus. civ. Stor. nat. Trieste 28: 137–146.Google Scholar
  50. Leonardi. C. 1973a. Note corologische e tassonomiche su alcuni Longitarsus con citazione di due specie nuove per l’Italia. Atti Soc ital. Sci. nat. Museo civ. Stor. nat. Milano 114: 5–42.Google Scholar
  51. Leonardi. C 1973b. Longitarsus berti nome nuovo per il L. ferrugineus (Foudras) sensu Kaszab (Coleoptera Chrysomelidae). Atti Soc. ital. Sci. nat. Musco civ. Stor. nat. Milano 114: 465–474.Google Scholar
  52. Leonardi. C. 1975a. Note su alcuni Longitarsus con descrizione di due nuove specie e ctazione di quattro entita nuove per la fauna europea (Coleoptera Chrysomelidae). Atti Soc. ital Sci nat. Museo civ. Stor. nat. Milano 116: 199–217.Google Scholar
  53. Leonardi. C. I975b. Le Psylliodes Appenniniche del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Verona. Boll Musco civ. Stor. nat.. Verona 2: 51–90.Google Scholar
  54. Leonardi, C. 1976a. Ricerche coleopterologische sul litorale ionico della Puglia, Lucania e Carabria. Campagne 1956,1957,1958 XVIII: Coleoptera Chrysomelidae. Alticinae. Atti Soc. ital. Sci. nat. Museo civ. Stor. Nat. Milano 117: 46–58.Google Scholar
  55. Leonardi. C. 1976b. Descrizione di un nuovo Alticino europeo: Longitarsus noricus n. sp. (Coleoptera Chrysomclidae). Atti Soc. ital.. Sci. nat. Musco civ. Stor. nat. Milano 117: 239–250.Google Scholar
  56. Leonardi. C. 1977. Condiderazioni su alcune Orestia con descrizione di una nuova specie dell’Asia Minor. Nat Soc. ital Sci. nat., Museo civ. Stor. Nat. e Acquario civ., Milano 68: 123–131.Google Scholar
  57. Leonardi, C. 1978. Studio critico sulla Psylliodes picina (Marsh.) e sulle forme che la sono state attribuite, con particolare riquardo alla fauna italiana (Coleoptera Chrysomelidae). Atti Soc. ital. Sci. nat. Museo civ. Stor. nat. Milano 119: 271–299.Google Scholar
  58. Leonardi, C. 1979. Descrizione di quattro nuovi Longitarsus della regione mediterranea (Coleoptera Chrysomelidae). Atti Soc. ital. Sci. nat. Museo civ. Stor. nat. Milano 120: 291–306.Google Scholar
  59. Leonardi, C. and Mohr, K.-H. 1974. Drei neue mit Longitarsus rubellus verwandte Arten aus den westeuropaischen Berggegenden (Coleoptera Chrysomelidae). Atti Soc. ital. Sci. nat. Museo civ. Stor. nat. Milano 115: 191–203.Google Scholar
  60. Leonardi, C. and Nonveiller, C. 1982. Considerazioni sulle Crepidodera del gruppo obirensis con particolare riquardo alla Crepidodera springer Heikertinger (Coleoptera Chrysomelidae). Atti Soc. ital. Sci. nat. Museo civ. Stor, nat. Milano 123: 237–249.Google Scholar
  61. Mann, J. S. and Crowson. R. A. 1981. The systematic positions of Orsodacne Latr. and Synela Lac. (Coleoptera Chrysomelidae), in relation to characters of larvae, internal anatomy and tarsal vestiture. J. nat. Hist. 15: 727–749.Google Scholar
  62. Mann. J. S. and Singh, J P. 1979a. Female reproductive system and genitalia oí genus Lrma (Crióterinac: Chrysomelidae: Coleoptera) Entomon 4: 89–94.Google Scholar
  63. Mann. J. S and Singh. J. P 1979b. Ovariole number in the family Chrysomelidae (Coleoptera: Phytophaga) from northern India. J. ent. Res. 3: 217–222.Google Scholar
  64. Mason, M. L, and Lawson. F. A. 1981. Internal morphology of the American aspen beetle, Gonioctena americana (Schaeffer) (Coleoptera Chrysomelidae). J. Kansas ent. Soc. 54: 156–160.Google Scholar
  65. Matsuda. R. 1976 Morphology and Evolution of the Insect Abdomen with Special Reference to Developmental Patterns and their Bearings upon Systematics. viii + 534 pp. Pergamon Press, Oxford, New York. Toronto, Sydney, Paris. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
  66. Mendoza. C. E. and Peters. D. C. 1968. Morphology and histology of the reproductive systems of adult southern corn rootworm. Ann. ent. Soc. Amer. 61: 1279–1284.Google Scholar
  67. Metcalfe, M. E. 1932. The structure and development of the reproductive system in the Coleoptera with notes on its homologies. Quart. J. microsc. Sci. 75: 49–129, pis. 7–10.Google Scholar
  68. Monga. D. 1972. Spermatheca and associated accessory gland in Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Bruchidae; Coleoptera). Zool. Polon. 22: 71–79.Google Scholar
  69. Monrós, F. 1955. Biologia y descripcion de la larva de Atalasis sagroides (Col. Chrysomelidae ). Revista Agronomica Noroeste Argentino 1: 275–281.Google Scholar
  70. Monrós. F. 1959. Los generos de Chrysomelidae (Coleoptera) Opera Lilloana III 337 pp.. 3 pls.Google Scholar
  71. Muir. D. and Sharp. D. 1904. On the egg-cases and early stages of some Cassidinae Trans, ent Soc. London 1904: 1–23, pis. I–VGoogle Scholar
  72. Mukerji, D. and Bhuya, M. A. H. 1937. Reproductive system of the bruchid beetles Bruchus quadrimaculatus Fabr., Bruchus (Callosobruchus) chinensis L. (Bruchidae-Coleoptera). J. Morph. 61: 175–221, pls. 1–3.Google Scholar
  73. Mulnard, J. 1954. Etude morphologique et cytochimique de l’oogenese chez Acanthoscelides obteclus Say (Bruchidae-Coleoptera). Arch. Biol. 65: 262–314. pls VI–VII.Google Scholar
  74. Pajni. H. R. 1967. The development of male geniul ducts and the associated structures in Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Bruchidae: Coleoptera). Res. Bull. Panjab Univ.. New Ser.: Sci. 19: 81–88.Google Scholar
  75. Pajni, H. R. 1968. Development of the female genital ducts and the associated structures in Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Bruchidae: Coleoptera). Res Bull. Panjab Univ., New Ser: SCI. 19: 341–348.Google Scholar
  76. Parnell, J. R. 1964. The structure and development of the reproductive organs of the two seed beetles Apion fuscirostre F. (Col., Curculionidae) and Bruchus ater (Marsh.) (Col., Bruchidae). Ent. Month. Mag. 100: 265–272.Google Scholar
  77. Paterson, N. F. 1930. Studies on the Chrysomelidae. Part I. The bionomics and morphology of the early stages of Paraphaedon tumidulus Germ. (Coleoptera, Phytophaga. Chrysomelidae). Proc. zool. Soc. 1930. No. 41. pp. 627–676. pls. I–IV.Google Scholar
  78. Patcrson. N. F. 1932. A contribution to the cmbryological development of Euryope termínala Balv (Coleoptera. Phytophaga. Chrysomelidae). II. Organogeny. South African J Sci. 29: 414–448, pis. 1V–VIILGoogle Scholar
  79. Pu, C.-L., 1938. A comparative study of the musculature of the male genitalia in several species of Coleoptera. Lingnan Sci. J. 17: 21–31. pls. 1–3.Google Scholar
  80. Qureshi, S. A., Ahmad. I. and Naqvi. N H. 1971. Functional morphology and histology of the reproductive system of the adult red pumpkin beetle Aulacophora foveicollis (Lucas) ( Chrysomelidae-Galerucinae) with comments on their phylogenetic value. Folia Biologica 19: 385–402.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Rethfeldt, C. 1924. Die Viviparität bei Chrysomela varians Schaller. Zool. Jahrb. A nat. 46: 247–302.Google Scholar
  82. Richard, N., Junea, H. and Charniaux-Cotton. H. 1970. Differenciation des gonades males et femelles chez Ies embryons, de doryphore Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say prives de leur ebauche cephalique. Etude de la neurosecretion au cours des premier stades larvaires et chez l’embryon. Bull. Soc. Zool. Fr. 95: 387–392.Google Scholar
  83. Robertson, J. G. 1960. Ovarioles as a meristic character în Coleoptera. Nature 187. 526–527.Google Scholar
  84. Robertson, J. G. 1961. Ovariole numbers in Coleoptera. Can. J. Zool. 39: 245–263.Google Scholar
  85. Saini, R. S. 1967. Histochemical and cytological studies on the ovarian development of Aulocophora foveicollis Luc (Chrysomelidae: Coleoptera). Ind. J. Ent 29: 353–359.Google Scholar
  86. Samuelson. G. A. 1966 Alticinae of New Guinea II. Amphimeloides (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Pac. Ins. 8: 403–445.Google Scholar
  87. Samuelson. G. A. 1966. Alticinae of Oceania (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Pac. Ins. Mon. 30: 1–165.Google Scholar
  88. Seeno, T. N. and Andrews, F. G. 1972. Alticinae of California, Part I: Fpitrix spp ( Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Col. Bull 26: 53–61.Google Scholar
  89. Selman. B J 1963. A revision of the genus Deretrichia Weise (Coleoptera: Eumolpidae). Bull. British Mus. nat. Hist. (Hnt.) 14: 155–196.Google Scholar
  90. Sharp, D. and Muir, F. 1912. The comparative anatomy of the male genital tube in Coleoptera. Trans, ent. Soc. London 1912: 477–642. pls. XLII–LXXVIIl.Google Scholar
  91. Shay, J. W., Simmons, E. E. and Dobson, W. J. 1969. Notes on the male germ cells of a beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata. Ent News 80: 185–191.Google Scholar
  92. Short, D. F., and Mill, R. F. 1972. Adult emergence, ovarian development, and oviposition sequence of the western corn rootworm in Nebraska. J. econ. Ent 65: 685–689.Google Scholar
  93. Siew. Y C. 1966 Some physiological aspects of adult reproductive diapause in Galeruca tanaceti (L.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Trans, r. ent. Soc. London 118: 359–374.Google Scholar
  94. Silferberg. H. 1976. Studies on galerucine genitalia 1 (Coleoptera. Chrysomelidae). Contribution to the study of Galcrucinac 10. Not. Ent. 56: 1–9.Google Scholar
  95. Singh, T. 1978a. Comparative morphological studies on the male reproductive system of Bruchidius (Bruchidae: Coleoptera). Entomon 3: 69–75.Google Scholar
  96. Singh. T. 1978b. The male accessory glands in Bruchidae (Coleoptera) and their taxonomic significance. Ent. scand. 9: 198–203.Google Scholar
  97. Smith. E. H. 1979a. Techniques for the dissection and mounting of the mate (aedeagus) and female (spermatheca) genitalia of the Chrysomelidae (Coleoptera) Col. Bull. 33: 93–103.Google Scholar
  98. Smith. E. H. 1979b. Genus Tanygasta Blatchley, a new synonym of Phyllotreta Chevrolat (Coleoptera Chrysomelidae: Alticinac). Col. Bull. 33: 359–362.Google Scholar
  99. Snodgrass, R. E. 1935. Principles of Insect Morphology, ix + 667 pp. McGraw-Hill Book C., New- York and London.Google Scholar
  100. Spett. G. and Lewitt, M. 1925. Zur Kenntnis des inneren Geschlechtsapparates der Blattkäfer (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Wiener ent. Zeit 42: 39–44.Google Scholar
  101. Spett. G. and Lewitt, M. 1926. Versuch einer Verwertung des Receptaculum seminis als systematisches Merkmal bei den Chrysomeliden. Arch. Naturgesch. 1926: 96–142, pls. I–Vl.Google Scholar
  102. Stein. F. 1847. Vergleichende Anatomie und Physiologie der Insecten in Monographien Bearbeitet. I. Monographie. Die weiblichen Geschlechtsorgane der Käfer. Verlag von Duncker und Humblot, Berlin. 139 pp., 9 pls.Google Scholar
  103. Stockmann, R 1966. Étude de la variabilité de quelques espèces françaises du genre Tïmarcha Latreille [Col. Chrysomelidae]. Ann. Soc. ent. Fr. (N.S.) 2: 105–126.Google Scholar
  104. Surtees. G. 1961. Spermathecal structures in some Coleoptera associated with stored products. Proc. r. ent. Soc. Lond. (A) 36: 144–152.Google Scholar
  105. Suzuki, K. 1974a. Phylogeny of the family Chrysomelidae based on the comparative morphology of the: internal reproductive system (Insecta: Coleoptera). Ph. D. Thesis. Tokyo Metropolitan University. 186 pp.. 61 pls (453 figs).Google Scholar
  106. Suzuki. K 1974b. Ovariole number in the family Chrysomelidae (Insecta: Coleoptera). J. Coll. Lib. Arts. Toyama Univ. (nat. Sei.) 7: 53–70.Google Scholar
  107. Suzuki. K 1975. Variation of ovariole number in Pseudodera xanthospila Baly (Coleoptera. Chrysomelidae. Alticinae). Kontyû, Tokyo 43. 36–39.Google Scholar
  108. Suzuki. K 1977. Historical review of studies of the internal reproductive system in the order Coleoptera. J. Coll Lib Arts. Toyama Univ. (nal Sci) 10: 27–59.Google Scholar
  109. Suzuki. K. 1978 Historical review of studies of the internal reproductive system in the family Chrysomelidae s.l.. (Coleoptera). J. Coll. Lib. Arts. Toyama Univ. (nat Sci) 11: 61–80.Google Scholar
  110. Suzuki. K. 1980. Phylogeny of the family Chrysomelidae (Coleoptera) based on the comparative morphology of the internal reproductive system. Read at the 16th International Congress of Entomology. Abstr. p. 30.Google Scholar
  111. Suzuki, K. 1983a. Historical review of studies of the internal reproductive system in the order Coleoptera. Supplement (I), J. Coll. Lib Arts. Toyama Univ. (nat. Sci.) 15: 85–100Google Scholar
  112. Suzuki. K. 1983b. Historical review of studies of the internal reproductive system in the order Coleoptera. Supplement (II). J. Coll. Lib. Arts. Toyama Univ. (nat. Sci.) 16: 15–30.Google Scholar
  113. Suzuki, K. and Hara, A. 1975. Supplementary report on the ovariole number in the family Chrysomelidae (Insecta: Coleoptera). J. Coll. Lib. Arts. Toyama Univ. (nat. Sci)8: 87–93.Google Scholar
  114. Suzuki. K and Hara. A. 1976. Comparative study of the egg size in relation to the egg number in the family Chrysomelidae (Insecta. Coleoptera) J. Coll. Lib. Arts., Toyama Univ. (nat. Sci.) 9. 39–81. pls. I–V.Google Scholar
  115. Suzuki. K and Yamada, K. 1976. Intraspecific variation of ovariole number in some chrysomelid species (Coleoptera. Chrysomelidae). Kontyû, Tokyo 44: 77–84.Google Scholar
  116. Teotia. T. P. S. 1958. The genitalia and reproductive organs of brinjal flea beetle. Psylliodes brettinghami Baly (Chrysomelidae: Coleoptera). Agra Univ. J. Res. 7: 77–86.Google Scholar
  117. Togashi, I. 1970. The comparative morphology of the internal reproductive organs of the Symphyta (Hymenoptera). Mushi, Fukuoka 43 (Supll.), 114 pp.Google Scholar
  118. Tombes, A. S. and Roppel. R M 1971. Scanning electron microscopy of the spermatheca in Sitophilus granarius (L.) Tissue & Cell 3: 551–556.Google Scholar
  119. Tombes. A. S. and Roppel. R. M. 1972. Ultrastructure of the spermatheca of the granary weevil. Sitophilus granarius(L.)(Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Int. J Insect. Morphol. and Embryol. 1: 141–152.Google Scholar
  120. Varma. B. K 1954. Post-embryonic development of teste in subfamilies Galerucinae and Alticinae of the family Chrysomelidae (Coleoptera). Cur. Sci. 10: 336.Google Scholar
  121. Varma. B K. 1955. Taxonomic value of spermathecal capsules as subfamily characters among the Chrysomelidae (Coleoptera). Ind. J. Ent. 17: 189–192.Google Scholar
  122. Varma, B. K. 1963. A study on the development and structure of the female genitalia and reproductive organs of Galerucella birmanica Jac. (Chrysomelidae: Coleoptera). Ind J. Ent. 25: 224–232.Google Scholar
  123. Varma. B. K. 1964. Study on the development and structure of the male genitalia and reproductive organs of Galerucella birmanica Jac. (Chrysomelidae: Coleoptera). Indian J Ent., New Delhi 26: 310–317.Google Scholar
  124. Verma, K. K. 1958. Tortion of the male genitalia of Galerucella birmanica Jac. (Coleoptera. Phytophaga, Chrysomelidae). Ann. & Mag. nat. Hist. Ser. 13,1: 793–794, pls X XII.Google Scholar
  125. Verma. K K 1969 Functional and developmental anatomy of the reproductive organs in the male of Galerucella birmanica Jac. (Coleoptera, Phytophaga. Chrysomelidae). Ann. Sci. Nat., Zool. Ser. 12, 11: 139–234.Google Scholar
  126. Verma. K. K. 1975. A basilar membrane in the testis of Aulacophora foveicollis Luc. (Coleoptera. Phytophaga, Chrysomelidae). J. nat. Hist. 9: 249–255.Google Scholar
  127. Verma, K. K. and Kumar. D. 1972 The aedeagus, its musculature, and ‘retournement’ in Aspidomorpha miliaris F. (Coleoptera, Phytophaga, Chrysomelidae). J. nat. Hist. 6: 699–719.Google Scholar
  128. Virkki.N. 1979. Ovariole numbers in two Puerto Rican Oedionychina Coleoptera). J. Agr. Univ. Puerto Rico 63: 50–56.Google Scholar
  129. Voukassovitch. P. 1939. Contribution a l’étude de la fonction des ovaries chez un Coleoptere: Phytodecta fornicata Brugg. Bull. acad. sci. math nat. (Ser. B), Belgrade 5: 113–125. (original not seen)Google Scholar
  130. Waloff, N. and Richards. O. W. 1958. The biology of the chrvsomelid beetle. Phyllodecta olivacea (Forster) (Coleoptera Chrysomelidae). Trans, r. ent. Soc. London 110: 99–116.Google Scholar
  131. Wellso. S. G. 1972. Reproductive system of the cereal leaf beetle. Comparison of morphology during seasonal development. Ann. ent. Soc. Amer. 65: 945–949.Google Scholar
  132. White, R. E. and Baber, H. S. 1974. Nomenclature and definition of the tobacco flea beetle. Epitrix hirtipennis (Melsh). and of E. fasciata Blatchley. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 76: 397–400.Google Scholar
  133. Wieman. H. L. 1910a. A study in the germ cells of Leptinotarsa signaticollis. J. Morph 21: 135–216.Google Scholar
  134. Wieman, H. L. 1910b. The degenerated cells in the testis of Leptinotarsa signaticollis. J Morph. 21: 485–494.Google Scholar
  135. Williams, J. L. 1945 The anatomy of the internal genitalia of some Coleoptera. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 47: 73–91. pls. 6–9.Google Scholar
  136. Wilson. S. J. 1934. The anatomy of Chrysochus auratus Fab., Coleoptera: (Chrysomelidae) with an extended discussion of the hind wing venation. J. New York ent. Soc. 42: 65–75. pls V-IX.Google Scholar
  137. Zakhvatkin, Yu. A. 1970. On the evolution of the female reproductive system of Chrysomelidae. Zool. Zhurn. 49: 1663–1666 (in Russian with Engl. summary)Google Scholar
  138. Zia, Y. 1936. Comparative studies of the male genital tube in Coleoptera Phytophaga. Sinensia 7: 319–352. pls. I–Xll.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kunio Suzuki
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biology, College of Liberal ArtsToyama UniversityToyamaJapan

Personalised recommendations