Abstract
Many species of leaf-feeding insects (for example in various families of Lepidoptera, in tenthredinid Hymenoptera and in chrysomelid beetles) have more or less actively gregarious larvae, the intensity of this phenomenon varying from species to species. In the chrysomelids for example (e.g. Agelastica alni), larval clustering may be quite loose, several individuals simply feeding on the same leaf with no more than occasional contacts, whereas in other species (e.g. Phratora spp.), the groups are tight and permanent, and result from an active gregarious behaviour. We will focus on this particular type of true gregariousness, which seems to have evolved among several insect orders in this common habitat (the leaf surface), as a convergent adaptation to constraints such as plant defense (physical and chemical), predators and parasitoids, competition and overexploitation of food resources, adverse weather conditions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Blum, M. S., Brand, J. M., Wallace, J. B. and Fales, H. M. 1972. Chemical characterization of the defensive secretions of a chrysomelid larva (Chrysomela interrupta: Col.). Life Sei. 11 (10): 525–531.
Breden, F. and Wade, M. 1985. The effect of group size and cannibalism rate on larval growth and survivorship in Plagiodera versicolora. Entomography 3: 455–463.
Carne. P. B. 1962. The characteristics and behaviour of the sawfly Perga affinis affinis (Hym). Aust. J. Zool. 10: 1–34.
Cox, M 1982. Larvae of the British genera of Chrysomeline beetles (Colcoptera: Chrysomelidae). Syst. Entomol. 7 (3): 297–310.
Dettner. K. and Schwinger. G. 1987. Chemical defence in the larvae of the leaf beetle Gonioctena viminalis L. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Experientia 43: 458–460.
Dias, B. F. de Souza. 1976 ). Comportamento pré-social de sinfitas do Brasil Central. II. Dielocerus diasi Smith. 1975 (Hymenoptera, Argidae). Studia Ent. 19 (1-4): 461–501.
Feeny. P. 1976. Plant apparency and chemical defense in biochemical interaction between plants and insects. In: J. Wallace and R. Manzell (eds); Biochemical Interactions Between Plants and Insects. Plenum Press. New York: 1–40.
Ghent. A. W. 1960. A study of the group-feeding behaviour of larvae of the Jack pine Sawfly. Neodiprion pratti banksianae Roh. Behaviour 16 (1-2): 110–148.
Goidanich. A 1956 Gregarismi od individualismi larvali e cure materne nei Crisomelidi (Col. Chrysomelidae). Mem. Soc. ent. ital. Genova. 35: 151–182.
Iwao, S. 1967. Some effect of grouping in Lepidopterous insects. In: ‘L’effet de groupe chez les insectes’. Editions du CNRS, Paris. 173: 185–212.
Jolivet. P. 1950. Les parasites, prédateurs et phoretiques des Chrysomeloidea (Coleoptera) de la faune franco-belge. Bull. Inst. R. Sci. nat. Belg. XXVI (34): 1–39.
Lengerken, H. von. 1939. Die BrutfĂ¼rsorge- und Brutpflegeinstinkte der Käfer. Akadcmische- verlagsgesellschaft. Geest and Portig, Leipzig.
McCauley, D. E. and O’Donncll, R. 1984. The effect of multiple mating on genetic relatedness in larval aggregations of the imported willow leaf beetle (Plagiodera versicolora, Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 15 (4): 287–291.
Meyer-Rochow, V. Benno. 1972. Verständigungsweisen bei koloniebildenden Blattwespen-und Käfer-Larven. Z. Tierpsychol. 30: 451–455.
Moore, B. P. 1967. Hydrogen cyanide in the defensive secretion of larval Paropsini (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). J. Austr. Ent. Soc. 6: 36–38.
Morrison, G. and Strong, D. R., Jr. 1981. Spatial variation in egg density and the intensity of parasitism I a neotropical chrysomelid (Cephaloleia consanguinea). Ecol. Entomol. 6 (1): 55–61.
Pasteels, J. M., Daloze, D. and Rowell-Rahier, M. 1986. Chemical defence in chrysomelid eggs and neonate larvae. Physiol. Entomol. 11: 29–37.
Pasteels,J. M and Grégoire, J.-C. 1984. Selectivc prédation on chemically defended chrysomelid lurvae. A conditioning process. J. Chem. Ecol. 10 (12): 1693–1700.
Stamp. N. E. 1980. Egg deposition patterns in butterflies: why do some species cluster their eggs rather than deposit them singly? Am. Nat. 115 (3): 367–380.
Tostowaryk. W. 1972. The effect of prey defense on the functional response of Podisus modesius (Hemiptera, Pcntatomidae) to the densities of the sawflies Neodiprion swainei and N. pratti banksianae (Mymenoptera. Neodiprionidae). Can. Ent. 104: 61 - 69.
Tsubaki. Y. 1981. Some beneficial effects of aggregation in young larvae of Pryeria sinica Moore (Lepidopiera: Zygaenidae). Res Popul. Ecol. 23: 156–167.
Tsubaki, Y and Shiotsu, Y. 1982. Group feeding as a strategy for exploiting food resources in the burnet moth Pryeria sinica. Oecologia (Berl). 55: 12–20.
Wade, M. J. and Breden, F. 1986. Life history of natural populations of the imported willow beetle. Plagiodera versicolora (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 79 (1): 73–79.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1988 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Grégoire, JC. (1988). Larval gregariousness in the Chrysomelidae. In: Jolivet, P., Petitpierre, E., Hsiao, T.H. (eds) Biology of Chrysomelidae. Series Entomologica, vol 42. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3105-3_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3105-3_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7896-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3105-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive