Food Habits and Food Selection of Chrysomelidae. Bionomic and Evolutionary Perspectives

  • Pierre Jolivet
Part of the Series Entomologica book series (SENT, volume 42)


So much has been written about the food-selection of Chrysomelidae and finally very little is actually known. Mostly in the Tropics, the observations are rather scanty and some areas like Madagascar remain totally unexplored. The richness of the Chrysomelid fauna is more or less linked with the abundance of the Flora. According to a recent estimate by Ehrenfeld (1986) of a quarter million spccics of plants, 90000 are in the New World Tropics, 30000 in tropical Africa, 10 000 in Madagascar and 35 000 in tropical Asia and Australia. The rest is spread in temperate and cold areas as well as in the Pacific. Some taxa are even undescribed. Madagascar with that enormous amount of plants for its relatively small size could provide a lot of information on the food-plants of primitive insects, such as the Sagrinae. If made known, this information could throw light on the evolution of the group. Unfortunately, we also do not know much about Australian host-plants of Chrysomelidae. Only in Asia, in South America and to a lesser extent in continental Africa, have the relationships Insects/Plants been rather well explored. If the New World Tropics have more species of plants than the rest of the Tropics put together, they also have more insects. The destruction of the Amazonian forest is unfortunately going on at such a speed that many plants and insects which feed on them will soon disappear since a species can become extinct whether it has been described or not.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Berry. R. J . 1985. The processes of Pattern, genctical possibilities and constraints in coevolution Oikos 44 (1): 222–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boppre, M. and Scherer, G. 1981. A new species of flea beetle (Alticinae) showing male-biased feeding at withered Heliotropium plants. Syst. Entom. 6: 347–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boving. A. G and Craighead. F. C. 1931. An illustrated synopsis of the principal larval forms of the order Coleoptera. Entom. Amer. II: 351 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Brovdij, V. M. 1983. Faune de I’Ukraine: 19. Cassidinae. Kiev 187 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Brovdij, V. M. 1985. The main trends and stages of evolution of tiophic links of the leaf-beetles (Col. Chrys.) of the USSR. Entomol. Obozr. 64 (2): 285–294.Google Scholar
  6. Bruner, S. C., Scaramuzza, L. C. and Otero, A. R. 1945 Catalogo de los insectos que atacan a las plantas economicas de Cuba. Santiago Bol. 63: 246 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Chen, S. H. and Wang, S. Y. 1962. On the distribution and desert adaptations of the chrysomelid beetles of Sinkiang. Acta Zool. Sinica 14 (3): 337–354.Google Scholar
  8. Chen, S. H. 1985. Phylogeny and classification of the Chrysomeloidea. Entomography 3: 465–475.Google Scholar
  9. Cox, ML.. 1981. Notes on the biology of Orsodacne Latreille with a subfamily key to the larvae of the British Chrysomelidae (Col.) Entom. Gaz. 32 (2): 123–135.Google Scholar
  10. Cox, M. L . 1982. Larvae of the British genera of chrvsomcline beetles (Col. Chrys.). Syst. Ent. 7: 297–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Crowson, R. A. 1946. A revision of the genera of the Chrysomclid group Sagrinac (Col.). Trans. R. Ent. Soc. 97 (4): 75–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crowson, R. A . 1953. The classification of the families of British Coleoptera. Ent. Month. Mag. 89: 181–198.Google Scholar
  13. Crowson, R. A. 1960. The Phylogeny of Coleoptera. Ann. Rev. En. 5: 111–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crowson, R. A . 1975. The evolution history of Coleoptera as documented by fossil and comparative evidence. Att. X Congr. Naz. Ital. Entom. Sassari: 47–90.Google Scholar
  15. Crowson, R.A. 1981. The Biology of Coleoptera. Acad. Press Inc. London, 802 pp.Google Scholar
  16. Ehrenfeld, D . 1986. Thirty million cheers for diversity. New Scient. 1512: 38–43.Google Scholar
  17. Erwin T.L. 1982. Tropical forests: their richness in Coleptera and other Arthopod species. Col. Bull. 36 (1): 74–75.Google Scholar
  18. Erwin, T. L. 1983. Tropical forest canopies: the last biotic frontier. Bull. ESA: 14–19.Google Scholar
  19. Erwin, T. L. 1983. Tropical rain forest: ecology and management. Blackwell Se. Publ. Oxford: 59–75.Google Scholar
  20. Furth, D. G. 1985. Some flea beetles and their food-plants from Kenya (Chrys. Alt.). Col. Bull. 39 (3): 259–263.Google Scholar
  21. Gressitt, J. I.. 1952. The tortoise beetles of China (Chrys. Cass.) Proc. Cal. Ac. Sc. 27 (17): 433–592.Google Scholar
  22. Gressitt, J. L and KimotoS 1%1. The Chrysomelidae (Coleoptera) of China and Korea Parti. Pac. Ins. Mon. 1(A): 1–299.Google Scholar
  23. Hughes, N F. 1976. Paleobiology of Angiosperm origins. Cambridge Univ. Press. 242 pp.Google Scholar
  24. Iablokoff-Khnzorian. S. M. 1985. Notes sur la ptiylogénic des Phytophagoidea (Col.). Deutsch. Ent. Zeitsch. 32 (1–3): 1–17.Google Scholar
  25. Jolivet, P. 1957–59. Recherches sur l’aile des Chrysomeloidea (Col.) Inst. R. Sc. Nat. Belg. Mem. 2(51): 1–180; 2(58): 1–152.Google Scholar
  26. Jolivet, P, 1971 Quelques remarques à propos de la plante-hôte des Platycorinus Chevrolat en Thaïlande (Col. Eumol.). Bull. mens. Soc. Linn. Lyon 40: 189–195.Google Scholar
  27. Jolivet. P. and Pctitpierre. E. 1973. Plantes-hôtes connues de Timarcha Latreille. Quelques considerations sur les raisons possibles du trophisme sélectif. Bull. Soc. ent. Fr. 78 (1–2): 9–25.Google Scholar
  28. Jolivet. P. 1974. Les Chrysomèlcs des Araliacécs (Col.). Bull. mens. Soc. Linn. Lyon. 43 (4): 113–120.Google Scholar
  29. Jolivet, P. and Petitpiene, E. 1976. Les plantes-hôtes connues des Chrysolina (Col. Chrys.). Essai sur les types de élection trophique Ann. Soc ent Fr. (N.S.) 12 (1): 123–149.Google Scholar
  30. Jolivet. P and Pctitpierre. E. 1976. Sélection trophique et évolution chromosomique chez les Chrysomelinac. Acta Zool. Pathol. Antwerp. 66: 59–90. 1976.Google Scholar
  31. Jolivet, P. 1977. Sélection trophique chez les Eupoda (Col. Chrys.) Bull. mens. Soc. Linn. Lyon 46 (9): 321–336.Google Scholar
  32. Jolivet, P. 1978. Sélection trophique chez les Clytnnac. Cryptoccphalinae et Chlamisinac (Camp- tosoma) et les Lampiosornatinae (Cyclica) (Col. Chrys.). Acta Zool. Pathol. Antwerp. 70: 167–200, 1978.Google Scholar
  33. Jolivet, P. 1979. Les Chrysomelidae (Col.) des Citrus et apparentés en zone tempérée et tropicale. Bull. mem. Soc Linn. Lyon 48(4): 197–200 and 249 - 256.Google Scholar
  34. Jolivet, P. 1979. Réflexions sur l’écologie, l’origine et la distribution des Chrysomelidcs (Col.) des îles Mascarcigncs Océan Indien, avec la description de deux espèces nouvelles. Bull. mens. Soc. Linn. Lyon 48(9–10): 524–528 and 606–649.Google Scholar
  35. Jolivet, P. and Petitpieire. E. 1981. Biology of Chrysomelidae. (Colcoptcra). Bull. Inst. Cat. Hist. Nat. Barcelona 47 (4): 105–138.Google Scholar
  36. Jolivet, P. 1982. Les Eumolpinac (Col. Chrys.) des Apocynaccac et des Asclcpiadaccac (Gentianales). Bull. mens. Soc. Linn. Lyon. 51 (7): 214–222.Google Scholar
  37. Jolivet, P. 1984. Phaedon fulvcsccns Weise (Col. Chrys.) un auxiliaire possible dans le contrôle des Riihus aux Tropiques Bull. mens. Soc. Linn. Lyon. 53 (7): 235–246.Google Scholar
  38. Jolivet, P., Petitpierre, E and Daccordi, M. 1986. Les plantes-hôtes des Chrysomelinac (Col.). Quelques nouvelles précisions et additions Nouv. Rev. Ent. 3 (3): 341–357.Google Scholar
  39. Jolivet, P. 1986. Sélection trophique chez les Megascelinae et les Eumolpinae (Cyclica) (Col. Chrys.). Bull. mens. Soc. Linn. Lyon, 56(6): 199–208 and 56 (7): 217–240.Google Scholar
  40. Jolivet, P . 1987. Aperçu de la Sélection trophique chez les galerucinae (Col. Chrys.). Bull. Soc. R. ent. Belgique 123: 283–307.Google Scholar
  41. Jolivet, P. 1987. Tropic selection among Alticinae (Col. Chrys. Trichost.). 50pp. (Sous presse).Google Scholar
  42. Jolivet, P. 1987. Sélection trophique chez les Hispinae (Cryptostoma) (Col. Chrys.). 28pp. (Sous presse).Google Scholar
  43. Jolivet, P . 1987. Selection trophique chez les Cassidinae (Col. Chrys.). 31 pp. (sous presse).Google Scholar
  44. Kingsolver, J. M. and Pfaffenberger, G. S. 1980. Systematic relationship of the genus Rhaebus (Col. Bruch.). Proc. Entom. Soc. Wash. 82 (2): 293–311.Google Scholar
  45. Kimoto, S., Ismay, J. W. and Samuelson, G. 1984. Distribution of Chrysomelid pests associated with certain agriculture plants in Papua New Guinea ( Col. ). Esakia 21: 49–57.Google Scholar
  46. Laboissiere, V . 1934. Galerucunae de la faune française (Col.). Ann. Soc. ent. Fr. 103: 1–108.Google Scholar
  47. Lopatin, I K 1984 Leaf beetles (Chrys.) of central Asia and Kazakhstan. Oxonian Press. New Delhi: 416 pp.Google Scholar
  48. Mann, J. S and Crowson, R. A. 1981. The systematic position of Orsodacne Latr. and Syneta Lacord. (Col. Chrys.) in relation to characters of larvae, internal anatomy and tarsal vestiture. Journ. Nat Mist. 15: 727–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mann, J. S. and Crowson. R A.. 1983. On the internal male reproductive organs and their taxonomic significance in the leaf beetles. Entom. Gener. 9 (1-2): 75–99.Google Scholar
  50. Mann, J. S. and Crowson, R. A. 1983. On the occurrence of mid-gut caeca and organs of symbiont transmission in leaf-beetles (Col. Chrys.). Col. Bull. 37 (1): 1–15.Google Scholar
  51. Mann, J. S. and Crowson, R A. 1983. Phylogenetic significances of the ventral nerve cord in the Chrysomcloidea ( Col. Phyt.) Syst Entom. 8: 103–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Maulik, S. 1919. Colcoptcra Chrysomclidae: Hispinae and Cassidinae. Fauna Brit. India, London: 439 pp.Google Scholar
  53. Maulik, S. 1937. Distributional correlation between Hispine beetles and their host-plants Proc. Zool. Soc. A2: 129–159.Google Scholar
  54. Maulik, S. 1941. Biology and morphology of the Sagnnae (Col. Chrys.) Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 2 (7): 235–254.Google Scholar
  55. Maulik, S. 1945. An inquiry into the relationships between the Chrysomelid beetles and their food-plants. Manuscript. London: 281 ppGoogle Scholar
  56. Medvedev, L. N. 1968. Leaf-beetles of the Kara Tau Jurassic. Symposium Jurassic Ins. Kara Tau. Moscow: 155–165.Google Scholar
  57. Medvedev, L. N. and DAP 1983. Host-plants of Vietnamese Chrysomclids. Acad. SSSR Fauna Vietnam 145–148.Google Scholar
  58. Monròs.F. 1984. Revision of the Chrysomelid subfamily Aulacoscelinae. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 112 (4): 321–359.Google Scholar
  59. Monròs, F . 1954 Megalopus jacobyi. nueva plaga de Solanaceae en el noroeste argentino. con notas sobre biologia y taxonomia de Megalopinae (Col. Chrys.). Rev. Agron. Argent 1(2): 167–179.Google Scholar
  60. Monròs. F . 1955. Remarques sur les affinités des familles de Cerambycoidea (Col.). Bull. Inst. r. Sc. Nat. Belgique 31(31): 1–7.Google Scholar
  61. Monròs, F. 1955. Biologia y description de la larva de Atalasis sagroides (Col. Chrys.). Rev. Agron. Noroestc Arg. 1 (3): 275–281.Google Scholar
  62. Rasnitsyn. A. P . 1983. First find of butterfly of Jurassic age. Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR 269 (2): 467–471. 1983.Google Scholar
  63. Santos, H. R. 1980. Distribuçao e danos do Agathomerus sellatus (Germar, 1824 ) (Col Chrys) em cultura de tomateiro. Rev. Set. Cienc. Agra. 2: 157–162.Google Scholar
  64. Santos, H. R . 1981. Redeserrçao do Agathomerus sellatus (Germar. l824)(Col. Chrys.) praga dotomateiro. Rev. Set. Cienc. Agra. 3: 107–116.Google Scholar
  65. Santos, H R. 1981 Biologia de Agathomerus sellatus (Germar. 1824) broca do tomateiro Rev. bras. Ent. 25 (2): 165–170.Google Scholar
  66. Schmitt, M . 1985. Versuch einer phylocenetisch-systematischen analyse der Criocennae (Col. Chrys.). Ent. Publ. Sacramento 1: 1–221.Google Scholar
  67. Seeno, T.N. and Wilcox, J.A. 1982. Leaf beetle genera (Col. Chrys.). Ent. Publ. Sacramento 1: 1–Google Scholar
  68. Selman, B. J. 1962. Remarkable new chrysomeloids found in the nest of arboreal ants in Tanganyika (Col. Chrys. And cryspt.). Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 13 (5): 295–299.Google Scholar
  69. Shute, S. L. 1983. Key to the genera of Galerucinae beetles of New Gunea, with a review of Sastra and related new taxa. (Chrys.). Bull. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.) Entom. 46 (3): 205–266.Google Scholar
  70. Smiley, E. H. 1985. Revision of genus Phyllotreta Chevrolat of America North of Mexico. Part 1. The Maculate Species. Fieldiana Zoology New Series 28: 168 pp.Google Scholar
  71. Southwood. T. R. E. 1985. Interactions of Plants and Animals: patterns and processes. Oikos 44 (1): 5–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Strong. D. R. 1977. Rolled-leaf Hispine beetles (Chrys.) and their Zingiberales host plants in middle America. Biotropica 9 (3): 156–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Tella. R . 1952. Contribuiçoes para o conheciniento do Agathomerus sellatus Gennar (Col. Megal.). R. Agric. Piracicaha 27: 273–276.Google Scholar
  74. Varma, B. K. 1955. Phylogenetic study of the family Chrysomelidae (Col.). Curr Se. 24 (1): 18–19.Google Scholar
  75. Vlasova, V. A. 1978. A prognosis of the distribution area of the Colorado beetle in the Asiatic part. Zasheita Rast. 6: 44–45.Google Scholar
  76. Wilcox, J. A. 1979. Leaf beetle host plants in Northeastern North America. World Nat. Hist. Publ.: 30 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pierre Jolivet
    • 1
  1. 1.ParisFrance

Personalised recommendations