Advertisement

Form and Function in Neurobiology

  • S. Firestein
Conference paper
Part of the Astrophysics and Space Science Library book series (ASSL, volume 144)

Abstract

A common strategy in modern neurobiology is to study aspects of nervous function in simpler animals whose nervous systems are less complex than our own and are thus more approachable. The unequivocal success of this strategy suggests that nervous tissue is more alike than it is dissimilar across the phyla. In particular the building blocks of nervous systems are seen to be remarkably similar and the functional differences from simple to complex nervous systems are the result of elaborations on the basics rather than of fundamental differences. Neural tissue possesses a kind of equipotentiality and may be capable of undergoing “elaborations” towards more complex forms without requiring qualitative changes. While this line of reasoning does not demonstrate that highly developed mental abilities may arise in forms other then the human it does suggest that it is not unreasonable to consider such development as possible.

Keywords

Nerve Cell Nervous Tissue Squid Giant Axon Retinal Axon High Order Learning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hodgkin, A.L. and Huxley, A.F. (1952). A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J. Physiol. 117:500–544. This classic contribution to the neurobiological literature is thoroughly reviewed in virtually every advanced undergraduate and graduate textbook in the field. Particularly recommended is Ionic Channels of Exditable Membranes, Bertil Hille (1986), Sinhauer, MA (pp 23–58).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kandel, E.R. (1976) Cellular Basis of Behavior. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carew, T.J. and Sahley, C.L. (1986) Invertebrate learning and memory: from behavior to molecules. Ann. Rev. Neurosci. 9: 435–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Heidmann, T. and Changeux, J.-P. (1978) Structural and functional properties of the acetylcholine receptor protein in its purified and membrane bound state. Ann. Rev. Biochem 47: 317–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stent, G.S. and Weisblat, D. (1982) The development of a simple nervous system. Sci Am 246:136–146. A sizeable review which suggests the breadth and depth of neurobiological studies confined to the leech is Neurobiology of the Leech, K.J. Muller, J.G. Nichols and G. S. Stent, eds. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fentress, J.C. (ed.) (1976). Simpler Networks and Behavior. Sinhauer, Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dumont, J.P.C. and Robertson, R.M. (1986) Neuronal circuits: an evolutionary perspective. Science 233: 849–853.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dowling, J.F. The Vertebrate Retina: An Approachable Part of the Brain (in press).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    An interesting non-technical discussion of the implications of flora-fauna common biochemistry as it relates to the brain appeared recently as: Roth, J. and LeRoith, D. (1987) Chemical Cross Talk: Why human cells understand the molecular messages of plants. The Sciences(NY Acad Sci)27, 3: 51–54.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Firestein
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate Group in NeurobiologyUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations