Advertisement

Chemical Affinity in the 19th Century and Newtonianism

  • W. Hornix
Chapter
Part of the Archives Internationales D’Histoire des Idées / International Archives of the History of Ideas book series (ARCH, volume 123)

Abstract

Newton’s influence on the development of chemistry did not originate in his chemical work. It is mainly the general impact of the “mechanical philosophy” of the Principia, and the specific mechanical explanation of the chemical displacement-reaction, given in the “Queries” of the Opticks that resonates in the theories of the chemists of the post-Newton era. For the eighteenth century this is set out in detail by Metzger, Schofield and Thackray. There are only fragmentary studies on Newtonianism in modern chemistry (since Lavoisier).1 Particularly, two subjects are important: atomic theory and chemical affinity. For this Paper I choose the theory of affinity and I will concentrate on the contribution of three researchers: Faraday, Joule, and Helmholtz. This choice is suggested by the undervaluation of their influence on nineteenth century affinity theory. In the discussions of the history of this subject, which covers the time between Berthollet’s law of mass action of 1801 and that of Guldberg and Waage as formulated in 1879, one usually forgets to mention the electrochemical affinity theory which dominated that period.2 Thermochemistry, although not neglected, is historically closely related to electrochemistry, as I hope to show. Chemical thermodynamics started its triumphal career with the solution of electro-chemical problems.

Keywords

Heat Effect Electromotive Force Electrolytic Cell Chemical Affinity Chemical Heat 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Elkana, Yehuda 1970 “The conservation of energy: a case of simultaneous discovery?” Archives Internationales d’Histoires des Sciences (1970). No. 90–1, 31–60. Also in Elkana Elkana, Yehuda 1974.Google Scholar
  2. Elkana, Yehuda 1974 The Discovery of the Conservation of Energy, London 1974.Google Scholar
  3. Faraday, Michael 1839 Experimental Researches in Electricity, London 1839.Google Scholar
  4. Helmholtz, Hermann 1847 Ueber die Erhaltung der Kraft, Berlin 1847, Ostwald Klassiker no. 1, English translation “On the Conservation of Force: a Physical Memoir,” in Scientific Mémoires selected from the Transactions of foreign Academies of Science and from foreign Journals — Natural Philosophy — John Tyndall, William Francis eds. London 1853 (1966) 114–162.Google Scholar
  5. Helmholtz, Hermann 1882 “Zur Thermodynamik Chemischer Vorgänge” Sitzungsberichte der Kgl. Press. Akad. der Wissensch. Berlin 1882 1er Halbband 22–39, 825–836. Helmholtz (1883) 958–978, 979–992. Ostwald Klassiker no. 124 (1902) herausg. M. Planck.Google Scholar
  6. Helmholtz, Hermann 1883 Wissenschaftliche Abhandlungen von Hermann Helmholtz 2er Band Leipzig 1883.Google Scholar
  7. Helmholtz, Hermann 1884,1 “Studien zur Statik Monocyklischer Systeme” Sitz. ber. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (1884), 159–177, 311–318. Helmholtz (1895) 119–141, 163–172.Google Scholar
  8. Helmholtz, Hermann 1884,2 “Principien der Statik Monocyklischer Systeme,” Crelle’s Journal 97 (1884) 111–140, 317–336, Helmholtz (1895) 142–162, 179–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Helmholtz, Hermann 1886 “Ueber die physikalischen Bedeutung des Princips der kleinsten Wirkung,” Crelle’s Journal 100 (1886) 137–166, 213–222, Helmholtz (1895) 203–248.Google Scholar
  10. Helmholtz, Hermann 1895 Wissenschaftliche Abhandlungen von Hermann von Helmholtz 3er Band Leipzig 1895.Google Scholar
  11. Hiebert, Erwin N. 1962 “The Concept of Chemical Affinity in Thermodynamics” Proc. 10th Int. Conf. Hist. Sci. (1962) 2: 871–873.Google Scholar
  12. Holmes, Frederic L. 1962 “From elective Affinities to Chemical Equilibria: Berthollet’s Law of Mass Action,” Chymia 8 (1962) 105–114.Google Scholar
  13. Joule, James Prescott 1840 “On the Production of Heat by Voltaic Electricity” Proceedings of the Royal Society Dec. 17, 1840, Joule (1887) 1, 59–60.Google Scholar
  14. Joule, James Prescott 1841 “On the Heat Evolved by Metallic Conductors of Electricity and in the Cells of a Battery during Electrolysis,” Philosophical Magazine 19 (1841) 260, Joule (1887) 1, 60–81.Google Scholar
  15. Joule, James Prescott 1842 “On the Electric Origin of the Heat of Combustion,” Phil. Mag. ser. 3 20 (1842) 98–113, Joule (1887) 1, 81–102.Google Scholar
  16. Joule, James Prescott 1843 On the Caloric Effects of Magneto-Electricity, and on the Mechanical Value of Heat, Phil. Mag. ser. 3 23 263–276, 347–355 and 435–443, Joule (1887) 1, 123–159.Google Scholar
  17. Joule, James Prescott 1846 “On the Heat evolved during the Electrolysis of Water” Mem. Manchester Lit. Phil. Soc. 2nd. ser. 7 (1843) 87- Joule (1887) 1, 109–123.Google Scholar
  18. Joule, James Prescott 1847 “On Matter, Living Force and Heat,” Manchester ‘Courier’ Newspaper, May 5 and 12 1847, Joule (1887) 1, 265–276.Google Scholar
  19. Joule, James Prescott 1852 “On the Heat disengaged in Chemical Combinations” Phil. Mag. ser 4, 3 (1852) 481–504, Joule (1887) 1, 205–235.Google Scholar
  20. Joule, James Prescott 1887 The Scientific Papers of James Prescott Joule, London 1887 (1963).Google Scholar
  21. Koenigsberger, Leo 1903 Hermann von Helmholtz 3 vol., Braunschweig 1903.Google Scholar
  22. Klein, Martin J. 1972 Mechanical Explanation at the end of the Nineteenth Century, Centaurus 17(1972)58–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kuhn, Thomas S. 1959 Energy Conservation as an Example of Simultaneous Discovery. Marshall Clagett ed. Critical Problems in the History of Science, Madison 1959, 321–356.Google Scholar
  24. Levere, Trevor H. 1971 Affinity and Matter, Elements of Chemical Philosophy 1800–1865, Oxford 1971.Google Scholar
  25. Mayer, Julius Robert 1842 Bemerkungen über die Kräfte der Unbelebten Natur, Liebig’s Annalen der Chemie und Pharmacie 42 (1842) 233–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Metzger, Hélène 1923 Les doctrines chimiques en France du début du XVIIe à la fin du XVIIIe siècle (première partie) Paris 1923.Google Scholar
  27. Metzger, Hélène 1930 Newton, Stahl, Boerhaave et la Doctrine Chimique, Paris 1930 (1970).Google Scholar
  28. Ostwald, Wilhelm 1896 Elektrochemie: Ihre Geschichte und Lehre Leipzig 1896, English translation (N.P. Date) Electrochemistry, History and Theory, New Delhi 1980.Google Scholar
  29. Scheler, Virginia M. 1966 Thermochemistry and the Third Law of Thermodynamics Chymia 11 (1966) 99–124.Google Scholar
  30. Schofield, Robert E. 1970 Mechanism and Materialism; British Natural Philosophy in an Age of Reason, Princeton 1970.Google Scholar
  31. Thackray, Arnold 1970 Atoms and Powers, An Essay on Newtonian Matter-Theory and the Development of Chemistry, Cambridge (Mass.) 1970.Google Scholar
  32. Williams, L. Pearce 1965 Michael Faraday, London 1965.Google Scholar
  33. Scott, Wilson L. 1970 The Conflict between Atomism and Conservation Theory 1644 to 1860, London, New York 1970.Google Scholar
  34. Steffens, Henry John 1979 James Prescott Joule and the Concept of Energy, Dawson 1979.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Hornix
    • 1
  1. 1.University of NijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations