Skip to main content

PRO-INFL and Reduced Structures

  • Chapter
  • 57 Accesses

Part of the book series: Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory ((SNLT,volume 14))

Abstract

This chapter analyzes structures in Welsh and English where an INFL is apparently missing. The sentences in (1)–(2) exemplify such ‘reduced constructions’, in this case reduced yes-no questions.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes to Chapter 4

  1. Sproat (1985a) offers an analysis that may explain the motivation for that V-fronting.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Akmajian, Steele and Wasow (1979) for an analysis of the English INFL system.

    Google Scholar 

  3. This distinction goes back to the treatment of deletions in the Standard Theory of Chomsky (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  4. For example, Raney (1986) cites in a different context examples from the novels of Kate Roberts (e.g. Traed mewn cyffrion)

    Google Scholar 

  5. The Welsh examples in (30) are adapted from Jones and Thomas (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hornstein (1977) uses Reichenbach’s formalism to some advantage in his treatment of temporal adverbs.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chapter 5 discusses the behavior of prepositions serving as complementizers.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See Koopman (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  9. The agreement marker that appears on the non-finite verb gweld in these examples is discussed at length in Chapters 5 and 6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. The resistance of (65a-c) to contraction is related to the well-known observation that gaps to the right of a verbal element block contraction. Kaisse (1983) and Nespor and Scorretti (1984) provide very different accounts of this generalization.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Trepos (1980, pp. 249, 276) indicates that the presence of da in examples such as these is optional. Hemon (1975a) claims that da emphasizes the inception of the activity denoted by the verb. Hemon also notes that the initial conjunction in these examples is not obligatory.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hendrick, R. (1988). PRO-INFL and Reduced Structures. In: Anaphora in Celtic and Universal Grammar. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol 14. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2719-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2719-3_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7725-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2719-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics