On the Solvency of Insurers

Part of the Huebner International Series on Risk, Insurance, and Economic Security book series (HSRI, volume 8)


The purpose of this contribution is to provide an overall view of the solvency issue such as the author sees it.


Business Cycle Market Risk Insurance Industry Solvency Ratio Claim Size 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Association of European Co-operative Insurers (Abbr. AECI). 1985. Seminar on Solvency Requirements. Bologna.Google Scholar
  2. Balzer, L.A. and Benjamin, S. 1980 and 1982. Dynamic Response of Solvency Systems with Delayed Profit/Loss Feedback. Journal of the Institute of Actuaries Google Scholar
  3. Beard, R., Pentikäinen, T. and Pesonen, E. 1984. (Abbr. BBP) Risk Theory. London: Chapman and HallGoogle Scholar
  4. Campagne, C. 1961. Minimum Standards of Solvency for Insurance Firms,Ad hoc Working Party on Minimum Standards of Solvency, OEEC, TP/AS(61)Google Scholar
  5. Carroll, P. 1985. Statistical Methods for Actuaries. Report presented to Students’ Society of the Institute of Actuaries and the Royal Statistical SocietyGoogle Scholar
  6. Coutts, S., Devitt, E.R.F. and Ross, G.A.F. 1984. A Probabilistic Approach to Assessing the Financial Strength of a General Insurance Company, Transactions of the international Congress of Actuaries. Vol.3:129–136Google Scholar
  7. De Wit, G. and Kastelijn, W. 1980. The Solvency Margin in Non-life Companies, ASTIN Bulletin 11,2:136–144Google Scholar
  8. Galbraith, J. 1973. Economics and the Public PurposeGoogle Scholar
  9. Galitz, L.C. 1981. Advanced Simulation Model of Insurance and Reinsurance. Geneva Papers Google Scholar
  10. Goovaerts, M.J., de Vylder, F. and Haezendonck J. 1984. Insurance Premiums. North-Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  11. Haidane, J.B.S. 1938. The Approximate Normalization of a Class of Frequency Distributions, Biometrica 29:392–404Google Scholar
  12. Hewitt, C.C. 1986. Discussion Contribution on Claims Reserves. Insurance: Mathematics & Economics Google Scholar
  13. Keinänen, E. 1934. Über das Annuitätten Prinzip in der Lebensversicherungs- technik, Transactions of the International Congress of Actuaries Google Scholar
  14. Landin, D. 1980. Risk Accumulation, a lecture paperGoogle Scholar
  15. McGuinness, J.S. 1976. Basic Economic Theory of an Insurer’s rate of Return and for its Regulation. Proceedings of the Casualty Actuarial Society Google Scholar
  16. Meyers, G. and Schenker, R. 1983. Parameter Uncertainty in the Collective Risk Model. Proceedings of the Casualty Actuarial Society: 111–143.Google Scholar
  17. Nationale-Nederlanden N.V. 1981. Loss Reserving Methods, Surveys of Actuarial Studies nr 1.Google Scholar
  18. Norberg, R. 1985. A Contribution to Modelling of IBNR Claims, University of OsloGoogle Scholar
  19. Norberg, R. and Sundt, B. 1985. Draft of a System for Solvency Control in Non-life Insurance, ASTIN Bulletin 15,2:149–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pentikäinen, T. 1987. Approximative Evaluation of the Distribution Function of Aggregate Claims. ASTIN Bulletin 17,1:15–39.Google Scholar
  21. Pentikäinen, T. and Rantala, J. 1985. On the Run-off Risk, ASTIN Bulletin, 16,2:113–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pentikäinen, T. and Rantala, J. 1982. Solvency of Insurers. Vol.1 and II. Insurance Publishing Co. (Bulevardi 28, 00280 Helsinki)Google Scholar
  23. Ramlau-Hansen, H. 1984. Samarbejtsprojektet vedrörande fluktuationsreserver, stormskader, Fremdriftsrapport nr 10, Forsikringsmatematisk Laboratorium, University of CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  24. Rantala, J. 1984. An Application of Stochastic Control Theory to Insurance Business, Doctoral thesis, TampereGoogle Scholar
  25. Redington, F.M. 1952,A Review of the Principles of Life Office Valuation, Journal of the Institute of Actuaries LXXVIII,p.286–303.Google Scholar
  26. Roth R.J.jr. 1985. California Earthquake Zoning and Probable Maximum Loss Evaluation. Dep. of Insurance, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  27. Roth, R.J. jr. 1984. Measuring Solvency and the Adequacy of Casualty Loss and Expense Reserves from the Point of View of Insurance Regulation. Transactions of the International Congress of Actuaries, Vol.3:255–268.Google Scholar
  28. Smith, M. 1981. The Underwriting Cycle in Property and Casualty Insurance. University of UtahGoogle Scholar
  29. Straub, E. 1984. Actuarial Remarks on Planning and Controlling in Reinsurance. ASTIN Bulletin 14,2:183–191.Google Scholar
  30. Taylor, G. 1986, Resreving in Non-life Insurance, North-Hollad, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  31. Tilley, J. 1980, The Matching of Assets and Liabilities, Transactions of the Society of Actuaries, XXXIIGoogle Scholar
  32. Wilkie, A.D. 1986 A Stochastic Investment Model for Actuarial Use, Transactions of the Society of Actuaries 39,3:341–403.Google Scholar
  33. Wilson, E.B. and Hilferty, Margaret 1931. The Distribution of Chi-square. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of USA, 17:684–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Working Party set up by the Faculty of Actuaries 1986. The Solvency of Life Assurance Companies. Transactions of the Faculty of Actuaries 39,3:251–339.Google Scholar
  35. Working Party on Solvency of the General Insurance Study Groups (GISG). 1984. The Solvency of General Insurance Companies. Journal of the Institute of Actuaries, (Abbr. BWP 1)Google Scholar
  36. Working Party on Solvency of the General Insurance Study Groups (GISG). 1985. A Simulation Model to Examine Questions of Solvency of Asset and Run-off Rsiks, submitted to the ASTIN Colloquium in Biarritz. (Abbr. BWP 2)Google Scholar
  37. Working Party on Solvency of the General Insurance Study Groups (GISG). 1985. The Solvency of General Insurance Companies Revisited, GISG Seminar Cheltenham. (Abbr. BWP 3)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1988

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations