• Robert C. Solomon
Part of the Analecta Husserliana book series (ANHU, volume 26)


“Phenomenology” is an approach to philosophy that I have always greeted with enthusiasm. At the same time, phenomenology has become a professional cult, with its own formidable jargon, its own society(ies), its heroes, villains, subversives and traitors. What I like most about phenomenology, I am afraid, makes me one of the villains, if not one of the subversives or traitors. For one thing, I tend to reject cults — professional or otherwise — in philosophy. For another, I prefer the personal, subjective, concrete aspects of phenomenology to its more ambitious grasp of transcendental objectivity and noematic Sinne. I think that a good question in phenomenology should be appropriate conversation at an intimate dinner, not just a subject for a seminar. Worst of all, my own model of doing phenomenology is still Jean Paul Sartre, when I am told by my more au courrant orthodox and heterodox friends that it ought to be the new and improved Husserl, or better, the just dis-closed works of the later Heidegger.


Business Ethic Good Question Meaning Structure Romantic Love Queen College 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert C. Solomon

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations