Abstract
Previous chapters dealt with analysis procedures, (Chapters 2-5), the ingredients needed for the analysis (Chapters 7-10) and with the use of the results for fracture control (Chapter 11). This Chapter concentrates on the general scope of the analysis, its relationship to tests (verification and substantiation), the assumptions and sources of error, and the design options for improvement of damage tolerance. In short, it considers the analysis in the framework of damage tolerance provisions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Airworthiness requirements FAR 25b. U.S. Federal Aviation Administration.
Damage tolerance requirements for military aircraft, MIL-A-83444.
G.L. van Oosten and D. Broek, Fatigue cracks approaching circular holes, Delft Un. rept (1973).
Anon. ASME boiler and pressure vessel code; Section XI; In service inspection of nuclear power plant components, plus Appendix A, Analysis of flaw indications, ANSI/ASME, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, Issued annually.
D. Broek, Elementary engineering fracture mechanics, 4th ed. Nijhoff (1985).
J.P. Gallagher et al., USAF damage tolerant design handbook, AFWAL-TR 82-3073.
R.C. Rice and D. Broek, Evaluation of equivalent initial flaws for damage tolerance analysis, Naval Air Dev. Center NADC-77250-30 (1978).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Broek, D. (1989). Damage tolerance substantiation. In: The Practical Use of Fracture Mechanics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2558-8_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2558-8_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-0223-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2558-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive