Abstract
A common theme runs through this entire paper, and that is the phenomenon of moral disagreement. I say “phenomenon” in order not to commit myself in advance to any view about whether or when moral disagreement is genuine or merely apparent: indeed, as will appear, whether genuine moral disagreement is even possible is one of the most important issues at stake. But even those who concede that genuine moral disagreements are possible have different views about the precise nature of the disagreements that there are, and about the best way of trying to resolve them. The various “pluralisms” in morality derive, I think, from the variety of analyses given of the phenomenon of moral disagreement. I believe that these different pluralisms raise very different issues which ought to be kept separate. I shall be arguing that in three, but not in all, senses of “pluralism” a pluralist position in morals is preferable.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Aristotle: 1955, Metaphysics, trans. W. D. Ross, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Duff, R. A.: 1982, ‘Intention, Responsibility and Double Effect’, Philosophical Quarterly 32, 1–16.
Grandy, R.: 1973, ‘Reference, Meaning and Belief’, Journal of Philosophy 70, 439–452.
Hallett, G., Hallett, S. J.: 1983, Christian Moral Reasoning, Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana.
Horton, R.: 1982, ‘Tradition and Modernity Revisited’, in M. Hollis and S. Lukes (eds.), Rationality and Relativism, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 201–260.
Hughes, G. J., S. J.: 1980, Authority in Morals, Search Press, London.
Lukes, S.: 1982, ‘Relativism in its Place’, in M. Hollis and S. Lukes (eds.), Rationality and Relativism, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 261–305.
Rahner, K.: 1974, ‘Pluralism in Theology and the Unity of the Creed in the Church’ and ‘Reflections on the Problems Involved in Devising a Short Formula of the Faith’, in K. Rahner, Theological Investigations, XI, Darton, Longman and Todd, London, pp. 11–23 and pp. 230–246.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hughes, G.J. (1989). Is Ethics One or Many?. In: Pellegrino, E.D., Langan, J.P., Harvey, J.C. (eds) Catholic Perspectives on Medical Morals. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 34. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2538-0_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2538-0_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7647-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2538-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive