Abstract
Market failure occurs when there is a divergence between a product’s private cost, the price faced by a purchaser, and its social cost, the value of real resources that are consumed when the product is produced. This holds even if private costs reflect efficient or minimum cost production. For institutional and legal reasons rooted in history, there is a substantial degree of market failure in the U.S. payment system. The use of some important payment instruments are in effect subsidized or taxed because of the divergence between their private and social costs. While there can be situations where such a divergence is in the public interest, this is not the case for the U.S. payment system. Here the subsidies and taxes distort incentives and misallocate resources, so that from a social viewpoint some payment instruments are underused and others are overused. The market failure in the U.S. payment system is the central focus of this chapter.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
American Express. 1983. Annual Report.
Avery, Robert, Gregory Elliehausen, Arthur Kennickell, and Paul Spindt. 1987. “Changes in the Use of Transaction Accounts and Cash from 1984 to 1986.” Federal Reserve Bulletin 73 (March): 179–196.
Avery, Robert, William Dudley, and Eugene Snyder. 1984. Social Security Check Float. Washington, D.C.: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Bank Administration Institute. 1985. Banking Issues and Innovations. Chicago.
Bank for International Settlements. 1985. Payment Systems in Eleven Developed Countries, rev. ed. Chicago: Bank Administration Institute.
Bator, Francis M. 1958. “The Anatomy of Market Failure.” Quarterly Journal of Economics (August): 351–379.
Berger, Allen N. 1985. “Electronic Payments Technology, Deregulation, and Interstate Banking.” Working Paper, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, D.C.
Berger, Allen N., and David B. Humphrey, 1986. “The Role of Interstate Banking in the Diffusion of Electronic Payments Technology.” In Technological Innovation, Regulation, and the Monetary Economy, ed. Colin Lawrence and Robert Shay. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger.
Berger, Allen N., and David B. Humphrey. 1988. “Interstate Banking and the Payments System.” Journal of Financial Services Research 1 (January): 133–145.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Federal Reserve Bulletin, various issues. Washington, D.C.
Berger, Allen N., and David B. Humphrey. 1983. Credit Cards in the U.S. Economy, Washington, D.C.
Berger, Allen N., and David B. Humphrey. 1986. Functional Cost Analysis. Washington, D.C.
Berger, Allen N., and David B. Humphrey. 1987a. Annual Report. Wasington, D.C.
Berger, Allen N., and David B. Humphrey. 1987b. Planning and Control System Expense Report (PACS). Washington, D.C.
Carreker, J. D., and Associates, Inc. 1985. Return Item Study: Final Report. Prepared for the Bank Administration Institute.
Cirrus System, Inc. 1985. Madison Report. Proprietary consultant’s report on retail payments in the U.S.
Cumming, Bruce D. 1983. “Understanding and Managing Canadian Availability: A Neglected Cash Management Opportunity.” Journal of Cash Management 3 (February-March): 26–31.
Curtin, Richard T. 1983. Payment Method Costs: Assessments by Retailers. Ann Arbor: Survey Research Center, University of Michigan.
Dingle, James F. 1986. “Technical Note: Introduction of Retroactive Settlement for the Daily Clearing of Cheques and Other Payment Items.” Bank of Canada Review (August): 3–7.
Displacing the Check. 1983. Special Issue of Economic Review 68 (August). Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.
Dudley, William C. 1983a. “The Tug-of-War over ‘Float.’”Morgan Guaranty Survey (December): 11–14.
Dudley, William C. 1983b. A Comparison of Direct Deposit and Check Payment Costs, 2d ed. Washington, D.C.: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Faulhaber, Gerald R., Almarin Phillips, and Anthony M. Santomero. 1989. “Payment Risk, Network Risk, and the Role of the Fed.” In The U.S. Payment System: Efficiency, Risk, and the Role of the Federal Reserve, ed. David B. Humphrey. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta. 1979. A Quantitative Description of the Check Collection System, vols. 1 and 2.
Humphrey, David B. 1984. The U.S. Payments System: Costs, Pricing, Competition, and Risk. Monograph 1984–1/2, Salomon Brothers Center for the Study of Financial Institutions, Graduate School of Business Administration, New York University, New York, N.Y.
Jackson, D. Mark. 1987. “Are ATM Strategies Changing?” Magazine of Bank Administration 63 (April): 16–18.
Kutler, Jeffery. 1988. “Payment System Gains Ground But Progress Is Slow.” American Banker (March): 21.
Layard, P.R.G., and A. A. Walters. 1978. Microeconomic Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
National Commission on Electronic Fund Transfers. 1977. EFT in the United States. Washington, D.C.
Penzer, Michael L. 1978. “The Nature and Size of Money Order and Traveler’s Check Markets in California and the Nation.” Mimeograph, Economic and Financial Information Division, California State Banking Department.
Pierce, James L. 1977. “The Users of Money Orders.” Mimeograph, Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley, Calif.
POS News. 1988. (January). Chicago: Barlo Communications Division of Faulkner and Gray, Inc.
Robinson, Michael A. 1987. “Travelers Check Industry Rebounds.” American Banker (September 3).
Scheele, Carl H. 1970. A Short History of the Mail Service. Washington, D.C: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Stone, Bernell K. 1989. “The Electronic Payment Industry: Change Barriers and Success Requirements from a Market Segments Perspective.” In The U.S. Payment System: Efficiency, Risk, and the Role of the Federal Reserve, ed. David B. Humphrey. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Survey Research Center. 1978. Household Mail Stream Study. Prepared for the Mail Classification Research Division, Rates and Classification Department, U.S. Postal Service. Ann Arbor: Survey Research Center, University of Michigan.
Survey Research Center. 1980. Nonhousehold Mail Stream Study. Prepared for the Mail Classification Research Division, Rates and Classification Department, U.S. Postal Service. Ann Arbor: Survey Research Center, University of Michigan.
The Nilson Report. 1987. Los Angeles: HSN Consultants, Inc.
Trans Data Corporation. 1988. 1988 Bank Pricing Program. Salisbury, Md.
U.S. Postal Service. 1986. We Deliver: The Story of the U.S. Postal Service. Publication No. 1. Washington, D.C.
U.S. Postal Service. 1987. Costs and Revenue Analysis Report. Washington, D.C.
Wall Street Journal. 1985. “Canceled Checks Are Destroyed at Some Banks, Producing Savings.” (February 21): 1.
Zimmer, Linda Fenner. 1987. “ATMs: An Industry Status Report.” Magazine of Bank Administration 63 (May): 30–37.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Humphrey, D.B., Berger, A.N. (1990). Market Failure and Resource Use: Economic Incentives to Use Different Payment Instruments. In: Humphrey, D.B. (eds) The U.S. Payment System: Efficiency, Risk and the Role of the Federal Reserve. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2510-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2510-6_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7633-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2510-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive