Abstract
The natural gas pipeline industry is no longer a protected natural monopoly. Regulation policy favors increased competition and open access to the transportation network. Entry barriers to the commodity are not sustainable with the emergence of an active spot market. Bypass of the local distribution facilities by heavy users is occurring. With growing competition, pipelines are seeking more flexible rates to keep major customers on the system. Gas companies are shifting from a fully bundled package of end-to-end services toward a multitude of services a la carte. All the elements of vigorous competition seem to be in place. But this Pollyannish view ignores the presence of significant economic factors that support the continued social control of the industry. These factors are the presence of a monopoly bottleneck transportation facility, decreasing costs both short- and long-run, vertical integration, and the growing incidence of pipeline mergers and acquisitions. The goal of this chapter is to bring these two conflicting views into perspective. It is clear that the problems of the natural gas industry must be evaluated from a broad analytical approach.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Energy Information Administration. A Study of Contracts Between Interstate Pipelines and Their Customers. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1984, p. 3.
Tussing, Arlon, and Connie Barlow. The Natural Gas Industry: Evolution, Structure, and Economics. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger Publishing Company, 1984, p. 165.
Cramer, Curtis. “The Structural Implications of a Minimum Bill Provision in the Transportation of Natural Gas.” International Journal of Transport Economics. February 1986.
Energy Information Administration, op. cit., pp. 24–25.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Order No. 380, Docket No. RM 83–71–000.
Energy Information Administration, op. cit., p. 000.
For an excellent discussion of distribution company strategies, see Tussing, Arlon, and Connie Barlow. “The Restructuring of the Natural Gas Industry: Implications for Gas Distributors and Their Regulators.” Natural Gas Industry Restructuring Issues. National Regulatory Research Institute, 1986, 7–18.
Cramer, Curtis. “The Non-Jurisdictional Gas Pipeline Tariff.” Industrial Organization Review, 5:2 (1977): pp. 130–134.
Colorado Interstate Gas Company versus Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America. Civil Docket No. C84–0139. U.S. District Court for District of Wyoming.
For a similar view see Tussing, A., and C. Barlow. The Natural Gas Industry. op. cit., pp. 211–212.
Vertical integration abuses by public utility holding companies were one of the reasons for the passage of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935.
Energy Information Administration, Statistics of Interstate Natural Gas Pipeline Companies, Selected Years, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cramer, C. (1989). Natural Gas Pipelines and Monopoly. In: Nowotny, K., Smith, D.B., Trebing, H.M. (eds) Public Utility Regulation. Recent Economic Thought Series, vol 17. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2508-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2508-3_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7632-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2508-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive