Skip to main content

Is Modern Physics Possible within Kant’s Philosophy?

  • Chapter
Philosophy and the Liberal Arts

Part of the book series: Contributions To Phenomenology ((CTPH,volume 2))

  • 118 Accesses

Abstract

A question which the scientist as well as the philosopher not infrequently asks concerns the function of philosophic thought about the sciences. One direction in which answers to a question of this kind sometimes tend is indicated by Weyl’s remarks upon Kant’s speculation on mirror images. Kant noted that the right and left hands are not interchangeable, yet they reflect each other. He asked how this curious difference could be more exactly understood. In an early writing, being unaware of the mathematics of the problem, he drew the conclusion that the two hands differ with relation to absolute space; later he rejected the doctrine of absolute space and reflected that the difference between the two hands is non-conceptual and hence must depend only upon intuition. He returned to the question in his Prolegomena and used the same curious phenomenon as a proof that space is nothing in itself but is a consequence of our way of perceiving. Thus, he took the problem out of mathematics and put it into his metaphysics of experience. Weyl, however, notes that the problem has a mathematical solution; although, out of reach of the mathematics available in Kant’s time. And he adds an unfavorable comment upon the metaphysician’s handling of a mathematical problem.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. In his The Philosophy of Mathematics and Natural Science (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1949), p. 84.

    Google Scholar 

  2. “Physics and Reality,” in Out of my Later Years (New York: Philosophical Library, 1950), p. 61.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cf. “Autobiographical Notes,” op. cit. p. 12 and “Reply to Criticisms,” ibid., p. 669.

    Google Scholar 

  4. “Einstein’s Theory of Knowledge,” op. cit. p. 366.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Einstein, “Clerk Maxwell’s Influence on the Evolution of the Idea of Physical Reality,” Essays in Science, trans, from Mein Weltbild (Amsterdam, 1933) by A. Harris, (New York: Philosophical Library, 1934), p. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  6. “Reply to Criticisms,” op. cit., p. 79.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cf. G. Martin, Kant’s Metaphysics and Theory of Science, trans. P.G. Lucas (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1961), chap. I.

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. Martin “The Problem of Space,” in Essays in Science, Op. cit. p. 61–77.

    Google Scholar 

  9. G. Martin “Reply to Criticisms,” Essays in Science, op.cit., p. 678.

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. Martin “Physics and Reality,” Essays in Science ibid. p. 62.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. d’Abro, The Evolution of Scientific Thought, 2nd. ed. (New York: Dover, 1950), p. 134f. I do not refer to that variant of the ether hypothesis which is compatible with the Special Theory and required by the General Theory, cf. Einstein, “Relativity and the Ether,” Essays in Science, p. 89–111; also cf. note 6 above.

    Google Scholar 

  12. The Meaning of Relativity, A. Einstein (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1946), p. 55.

    Google Scholar 

  13. This derivation is adapted from one given by R.B. Lindsay and H. Morgenau in Foundations of Physics, 2nd ed. (New York: Dover Publications, 1957) p. 335ff. I choose it rather than Einstein’s derivation (e.g., in The Special and the General Theory, trans. Robert W. Lawson (New York: H. Holt & Co., 1920), pp. 115–120, since it makes with more succinctness the point which I wish to emphasize.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ballard, E.G. (1989). Is Modern Physics Possible within Kant’s Philosophy?. In: Philosophy and the Liberal Arts. Contributions To Phenomenology, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2368-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2368-3_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7566-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2368-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics